Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-28 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello Jason, * Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com, 2027 22:15: Thanks for the impressive list of advantages! There's just one non-critical issue I'd like to address regarding the use of xterm terminal type. When using cons25 terminal, the dialog menus (drawn using devel/cdialog and `make

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-27 Thread Jason Edwards
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote: Hi Jason, * Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com, 2022 21:56: I wonder: is cons25 bugged or simply obsolete? Not that I want to keep cons25; just being curious. There are two reasons why I changed the default terminal

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 22.11.2011 um 21:56 schrieb Jason Edwards: I wonder: is cons25 bugged or simply obsolete? Not that I want to keep cons25; just being curious. cons25 is no more, syscons speaks xterm now, thanks to Ed Schouten and his libteken. Stefan -- Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de Fon +49 151

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi Jason, * Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com, 2022 21:56: I wonder: is cons25 bugged or simply obsolete? Not that I want to keep cons25; just being curious. There are two reasons why I changed the default terminal emulator to be xterm-like, instead of conforming to cons25: - It is more

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Ed Schouten
* Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl, 2023 19:11: There are two reasons why I changed the default terminal emulator to be xterm-like, instead of conforming to cons25: Errr... for large values of two. -- Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpifNuiJHbAs.pgp Description: PGP

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-22 Thread Jason Edwards
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 20.11.2011 um 14:41 schrieb Jason Edwards: Some of you asked for the environmental settings. Using 'env' the output begins with: -- on console -- TERM=cons25 SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash -- via SSH -- TERM=xterm

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Jason Edwards
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Nov 20 11, Jason Edwards wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 20.11.2011 um 14:41 schrieb Jason Edwards: Some of you asked for the environmental settings. Using 'env' the output begins with: -- on console -- TERM=cons25 SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash -- via SSH -- TERM=xterm SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash Via SSH the ee editor works as it should. On

ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Jason Edwards
Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of the boundary (line 0) 3) the keys page up and page down

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Methinks your $TERM is set incorrectly. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. how many users is this going to trip up? adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: .. how many users is this going to trip up? cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I went through several iterations with ed@ over the fact that various curses based apps were broken with the

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: .. how many users is this going to trip up? cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I went through several iterations with ed@ over the fact that

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: .. how many users is this going to trip up? cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: .. how many users is this going to trip up? cons25 is

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-19 Thread Jan Beich
Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com writes: Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of the boundary (line 0)