Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-25 Thread Pavel Timofeev
Hmm, it was a few days ago. Something like "Unable to allocate bus resource: memory" Today I rebuilt latest kernel & world and now em and ahci works! 2011/7/25 John Baldwin > On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:46:44 am timp wrote: > > I have same problems with em and ahci. > > > > Now in VirtialBox I t

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-25 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:46:44 am timp wrote: > I have same problems with em and ahci. > > Now in VirtialBox I temporarily set net iface to PCNet-PCI II (Am79C970A). > It works with if_le driver. > > VirtualBox 4.1, recent FreeBSD 9. So are you having problems with the latest FreeBSD 9? Can y

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-25 Thread timp
I have same problems with em and ahci. Now in VirtialBox I temporarily set net iface to PCNet-PCI II (Am79C970A). It works with if_le driver. VirtualBox 4.1, recent FreeBSD 9. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/em-problem-in-virtualbox-since-the-weekend

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-22 Thread Steve Wills
On 07/21/11 15:10, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:53 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> Hmm, so there does look to be a reasonable _CRS method. Oh, I think I see >> what I don't like: >> >>DWordMemory (ResourceProducer, PosDecode, MinNotFixed, >> MaxFixed, Cacheable, Rea

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-22 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 22 July 2011 01:41 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, July 22, 2011 12:19:24 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Friday 22 July 2011 08:05 am, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Err, this is clearly illegal. Consult Table 6-38 from ACPI > > > Spec 3.0b (page 213, actual page 233 in the PDF). If the _

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, July 22, 2011 12:19:24 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 22 July 2011 08:05 am, John Baldwin wrote: > > Err, this is clearly illegal. Consult Table 6-38 from ACPI Spec > > 3.0b (page 213, actual page 233 in the PDF). If the _LEN of an > > Address Space Descriptor is > 0, then _MIF (Min

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-22 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 22 July 2011 08:05 am, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, July 21, 2011 6:37:05 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Thursday 21 July 2011 11:53 am, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:22:33 pm Steve Wills wrote: > > > > On 07/20/11 09:04, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On Wedn

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, July 21, 2011 6:37:05 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 21 July 2011 11:53 am, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:22:33 pm Steve Wills wrote: > > > On 07/20/11 09:04, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:33:07 am Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > > >

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-21 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 21 July 2011 11:53 am, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:22:33 pm Steve Wills wrote: > > On 07/20/11 09:04, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:33:07 am Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > > >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>>

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-21 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:53 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > Hmm, so there does look to be a reasonable _CRS method.  Oh, I think I see > what I don't like: > >                DWordMemory (ResourceProducer, PosDecode, MinNotFixed, > MaxFixed, Cacheable, ReadWrite, >                    0x,    

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:22:33 pm Steve Wills wrote: > On 07/20/11 09:04, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:33:07 am Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: >

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > I think it would be good if someone could try to reproduce that with > emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy which is 3.2.12 to get some vbox dev > look into the problem again. I saw the problem this weekend on a Linux host running virtualbox

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/11 09:04, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:33:07 am Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: Hi, While t

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:33:07 am Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't > >> work with the em0

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:33:19 am Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-07-20 14:33, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> While testing some other things, I found -CU

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-07-20 14:33, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't >>> work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:41:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't >> work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date >> admittedly). It worked Friday

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:35:42 pm Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't > work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date > admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday I think. Anyone else seen this > or should I open

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Vlad Galu
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On 7/20/2011 5:35 AM, Steve Wills wrote: > >> While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't >> work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date >> admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday I thin

Re: em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-20 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 7/20/2011 5:35 AM, Steve Wills wrote: While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday I think. Anyone else seen this I also see this on a 4.0.4something installat

em problem in virtualbox since the weekend

2011-07-19 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday I think. Anyone else seen this or should I open a PR? Has the code ch