Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Sean O'Connell
Grigory Kljuchnikov stated: > Thank you, Erik! > > I find rpc.lockd and start it manually. My test with NFS locking works right. > But it don't start on boot by default if I enable NFS server in > /stand/sysinstall and there is the comment in /etc/default/rc.conf > for rpc_lockd_enable: > > rpc_

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread David Malone
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 05:51:18PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > Somebody who knows what is up with rpc.lockd is welcome to comment. AFAIK the lockd code just says "Sure - have a lock" to any request. I think David Cross and some other people have a half working lockd now, they were looking for

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Steve Hovey
I believe the lockd daemon is used in environments where applications at the client end will not work unless they can make a lock call and get a positive result.. so in environments where you feel its fairly safe to fake a lock to a client app, in order to get the app working at all, that you wou

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:46:12PM +0300, Grigory Kljuchnikov wrote: > Thank you, Erik! > > I find rpc.lockd and start it manually. My test with NFS locking works right. > But it don't start on boot by default if I enable NFS server in > /stand/sysinstall and there is the comment in /etc/default/

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Grigory Kljuchnikov
Thank you, Erik! I find rpc.lockd and start it manually. My test with NFS locking works right. But it don't start on boot by default if I enable NFS server in /stand/sysinstall and there is the comment in /etc/default/rc.conf for rpc_lockd_enable: rpc_lockd_enable="NO" # Run NFS rpc.loc

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:04:55PM +0300, Grigory Kljuchnikov wrote: > Thierry, thank you for the information, > but it's very bad that there isn't NFS locking in FreeBSD. > I'm afraid I need to move my FreeBSD NFS server to Solaris > for x86. > > I don't understand why NFS locking isn't in Fre

Re: errno (46) - for FreeBSD 4.0 NFS server

2000-03-22 Thread Grigory Kljuchnikov
Thierry, thank you for the information, but it's very bad that there isn't NFS locking in FreeBSD. I'm afraid I need to move my FreeBSD NFS server to Solaris for x86. I don't understand why NFS locking isn't in FreeBSD. Is it difficult in the implementation or are there another global problem