Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Graham Perrin
On 02/01/2021 16:48, Warner Losh wrote: On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 1:31 AM Graham Perrin > wrote: On 01/01/2021 19:24, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:01:16 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: >> At what should have been the end of my first

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:43 AM Graham Perrin wrote: > On 02/01/2021 08:47, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > >> < > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html> > >> still describes use of `svnlite` (not `git` or `got`) and, I guess, > >> might continue to do so for some

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 1:31 AM Graham Perrin wrote: > On 01/01/2021 19:24, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:01:16 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > >> At what should have been the end of my first upgrade since the > >> transition to git: > >> > >> cd /usr/src/freebsd-current &&

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 17:18:10 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > > Sorry for the mis-formatting and lost line breaks in my previous > e-mail. Blame Thunderbird. > > As reference: > > > > /usr/src > > > BSD, third-party, and/or local source files

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Graham Perrin
Sorry for the mis-formatting and lost line breaks in my previous e-mail. Blame Thunderbird. As reference: /usr/src > BSD, third-party, and/or local source files ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 03:43:04PM +, Graham Perrin wrote: > ... > >> In this context, is `cd /usr/src` still true? > > If you clone the repository to /usr/src instead of e.g. > > /usr/src/freebsd-current. > > Thanks again. > > I imagine that use cases will _eventually_ include trios of

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Graham Perrin
On 02/01/2021 08:47, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: still describes use of `svnlite` (not `git` or `got`) and, I guess, might continue to do so for some time. In this context, is `cd /usr/src` still true? If you clone the

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:47:07 +0100 "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:31:36 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > > > > With the transition to Git > > > > == > > > > If it's true that /usr/src is _no longer_ a predictable path to the > > source files, then is

Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:31:36 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > > With the transition to Git > > == > > If it's true that /usr/src is _no longer_ a predictable path to the > source files, then is it still appropriate for users' fortunes to > include this FreeBSD tip? > >

etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git

2021-01-02 Thread Graham Perrin
On 01/01/2021 19:24, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:01:16 +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: At what should have been the end of my first upgrade since the transition to git: cd /usr/src/freebsd-current && make installworld && etcupdate Ĵ– concluded with a successful installworld,