Kimmo Paasiala writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Kimmo Paasiala writes:
> > > Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the
> > > system sources in the version output?
> > No. It is not available in the most important use case for
> > freebsd-version(1), i.e. freebsd-upda
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Kimmo Paasiala writes:
>> Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system
>> sources in the version output?
>
> No. It is not available in the most important use case for
> freebsd-version(1), i.e. freebsd-update
Kimmo Paasiala writes:
> Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system
> sources in the version output?
No. It is not available in the most important use case for
freebsd-version(1), i.e. freebsd-update builds.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> I didn't even know this tool existed before tried to complete
> freebsd- today, very nice.
>
> Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system
> sources in the version output? Maybe with a separate option (-u
> perhaps?)
I didn't even know this tool existed before tried to complete
freebsd- today, very nice.
Would it make sense to also include the svnversion(1) of the system
sources in the version output? Maybe with a separate option (-u
perhaps?) if it's not ok to change the meaning of -k and -u options
anymore.
