Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch writes:
I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
controlled by loader.conf variables. (Maybe like gnop? If I remember
correctly, I did not take a look at that class for
On 9 August 2010 10:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch writes:
I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
controlled by loader.conf variables. (Maybe like gnop? If
Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch writes:
I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
controlled by loader.conf
On 9 August 2010 14:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch writes:
I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
that has no metadata stored on disk
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:57:44AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
In order to help users having 4k sector drives which the system
recognizes as 512 byte sector drives, I'm proposing
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
So why do you want to obfuscate glabel with it? For people to start
depend on it? Once we start supporting 4kB sectors what do we do with
such a change? Remove it and decrease version
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd like to hear comments from the wider audience. In respect with your
comment, I will compromise: as 4k sector drives have become available
over the counter
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 21:08, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8.8.2010 14:57, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This mechanism is a band-aid until there's a better way of dealing
with 4k drives.
I do not like this at all. Even
