On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:36:37 +0300
"Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote:
> On 28.01.2019 15:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Stopping all jails, destroying all epairs and bridge0 doesn't change
> > anything. The problems occured when IPv6 came into play on the specific
> > host in question.
> >
> > Does anyone
On 28.01.2019 15:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Stopping all jails, destroying all epairs and bridge0 doesn't change anything.
> The problems occured when IPv6 came into play on the specific host in
> question.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas? I'm out of ideas.
Hi,
I think I found the problem, the
On 28.01.2019 15:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Stopping all jails, destroying all epairs and bridge0 doesn't change anything.
>
> The problems occured when IPv6 came into play on the specific host in
> question.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas? I'm out of ideas.
Since your ruleset is relatively
On 28 Jan 2019, at 12:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
I ran into severe problems on CURRENT ( FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #193
r343521: Mon Jan 28 10:26:36 CET 2019 amd64), VIMAGE enabled host with
jails
utilizing IPv6.
and you forget to mention in the subject that it seems to be an ipfw
problem and thus
I ran into severe problems on CURRENT ( FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #193
r343521: Mon Jan 28 10:26:36 CET 2019 amd64), VIMAGE enabled host with jails
utilizing IPv6.
Scenario:
The main host has two Braodcom (bce0|1) NICs. bce0 is the physical NIC attached
to a routed/switched network for the main host.
