Re: is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-26 Thread Luigi Rizzo
i'd rather fix the change so that ether is not mandatory. Let me think/experiment a bit about it. cheers luigi On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:16:49AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello Luigi, On 05:20-0800, Mar 24, 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Do you have a suggestion for an

Re: is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-25 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello Luigi, On 05:20-0800, Mar 24, 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Do you have a suggestion for an #ifdef /#endif to remove the problem you mention ? Frankly speaking, I have no solution atm. But IMHO we should fix LINT and warn our -stable users at least. Something like that: Index:

Re: is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-24 Thread Oleg V. Naumann
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 08:50:19PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any ethernet or token-ring devices. The same problem in STABLE... from revision 1.85.2.15 of net/if.c: #ifdef INET /* *

Re: is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-24 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Do you have a suggestion for an #ifdef /#endif to remove the problem you mention ? cheers luigi On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 08:50:19PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any ethernet or token-ring devices.

is 'device ether' mandatory now?

2002-03-23 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello, After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any ethernet or token-ring devices. | luigi 2002/02/18 14:50:13 PST | | Modified files: |sys/net if.c | Log: | When the local link address is changed, send out gratuitous ARPs | to notify other