Re: jdk 1.3.1_6 linux compilation.

2002-11-26 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Daniel Flickinger wrote: I just brought up ooo-1.0.l without the java. I had IBM's latest and greatest Linux-java, but it did not want to recognize it so I left the box checked for no java in setup. Everything runs as advertised on openoffice --it looks good. I tried a few

Re: jdk 1.3.1_6 linux compilation.

2002-11-26 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Marcin Dalecki ]-- | | (I'm still fetching the whole Linux emulation environment just | to get openoffice up and running again... g...) make -DNATIVE_BOOTSTRAP install for /usr/ports/java/jdk13 should avoid needing the Linux Emu just to get Java running... I hav

Re: jdk 1.3.1_6 linux compilation.

2002-11-26 Thread Marcin Dalecki
David Holm wrote: On Tuesday 26 November 2002 18:19, Marcin Dalecki wrote: During a compile of the openoffice-pl package I have just noticed, that 1. Well it depends on java... 2. java depends on the Linux emulation stuff. 3. The automatic fetching of the linux stuff is still looking for RedHat

Re: jdk 1.3.1_6 linux compilation.

2002-11-26 Thread David Holm
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 18:19, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > During a compile of the openoffice-pl package I have just noticed, that > 1. Well it depends on java... > 2. java depends on the Linux emulation stuff. > 3. The automatic fetching of the linux stuff is still looking for RedHat > 7.1 files a

jdk 1.3.1_6 linux compilation.

2002-11-26 Thread Marcin Dalecki
During a compile of the openoffice-pl package I have just noticed, that 1. Well it depends on java... 2. java depends on the Linux emulation stuff. 3. The automatic fetching of the linux stuff is still looking for RedHat 7.1 files at the ftp.redhat.com FTP site. Well I could live with using OpenOf