Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Well yeah, that's fun to say, but my days have been literally completely > full with getting other things ready for 4.0. And you think mine haven't been? :) My point is simply that I'm going to need a lot more than rough suggestions at this point if people want to help. I don't have time to go

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Bob Bishop
At 02:56 -0800 13/3/00, Kris Kennaway wrote: >Looks like it needs the following patch: > >Index: usr.sbin/tcpdump//tcpdump/Makefile >=== >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/Makefile,v >retrieving revision 1.25 >diff -u

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread John Hay
It also needs DISTRIBUTION=crypto inside that .if so that it will end up in the crypto distribution. And maybe the exists(../../../crypto should be exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) like the ppp/Makefile? > > > Hmm. I didn't know that - probably it could. The question is then whether > > make rele

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Hmm. I didn't know that - probably it could. The question is then whether > make release correctly compiles everything without libcrypto (the original > poster suggests not). Looks like it needs the following patch: Index: usr.sbin/tcpdump//tcpdump/Ma

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, John Hay wrote: > Can't it be handled the same way init, ppp and a few others are? The > binary shipped in the bin distribution is compiled/linked without crypto, > but then a version compiled/linked with it is included in the crypto > distribution. Hmm. I didn't know that -

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread John Hay
> > > > IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto > > > collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to > > > point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is > > > > I'm still waiting for your diffs which do this. :) > >

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto > > collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to > > point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is > > I'm still waiting for

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto > collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to > point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is I'm still waiting for your diffs which do this. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe

Re: latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jason Garman wrote: > I just installed the latest 4.0 snap off of ftp2.freebsd.org. Didn't > install the DES libraries... > > I get this when trying to run tcpdump on the system: > > unstable# tcpdump > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.1" not found Hm

latest 4.0 snapshot breaks tcpdump

2000-03-13 Thread Jason Garman
I just installed the latest 4.0 snap off of ftp2.freebsd.org. Didn't install the DES libraries... I get this when trying to run tcpdump on the system: unstable# tcpdump /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.1" not found enjoy -- Jason Garman