Dr. Richard E. Hawkins said:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:49:42PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
>> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>> WRT the mime thing. My apologies. It never occured to me as
>> everyone I
>> know personally uses a "real" mail reader. I'd attached them
>> simply to
>> keep the scrolling
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:49:42PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> WRT the mime thing. My apologies. It never occured to me as everyone I
> know personally uses a "real" mail reader. I'd attached them simply to
> keep the scrolling down and allow order independant viewing.
Craig Rodrigues writes:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:17:33PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > You have machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1 in your sysctl output. [BTW,
> > lots of people read this mail via the web archives at
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1073654+0+current/freebsd
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:17:33PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> You have machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1 in your sysctl output. [BTW,
> lots of people read this mail via the web archives at
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1073654+0+current/freebsd-current,
> where its impossible to v
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >Adam Migus writes:
> > > Folks,
> > > While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
> > > on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
> > > that hangs. It happens every time but not n
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Adam Migus writes:
> Folks,
> While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
> on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
> that hangs. It happens every time but not necessarily in the same
> place in the make.
>
<...>
> The ha
Adam Migus writes:
> Folks,
> While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
> on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
> that hangs. It happens every time but not necessarily in the same
> place in the make.
>
<...>
> The hardware is a dual
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:45:28PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
> I also do testing on a dual Althon and honestly didn't bother to
> research whether they'd have any affect. Could/would they be
> causing a problem? I'll recompile without them and try again at any
> rate.
They are old options for ena
Bruce M Simpson said:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:09:44PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
>> The hardware is a dual Xeon box. The kernel is SMP w/ SCHED_ULE
>> instead of SCHED_4BSD, the options required for diskless and the
>> following two options:
>>
>> options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU
>> options
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:09:44PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
> The hardware is a dual Xeon box. The kernel is SMP w/ SCHED_ULE
> instead of SCHED_4BSD, the options required for diskless and the
> following two options:
>
> options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU
> options CPU_UPGRADE_HW_CACHE
10 matches
Mail list logo
