Re: make.conf not in -current tree (was cvs commit: src/include stdio.h)

2001-09-21 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: Thus spake Vincent Poy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I was looking on the -current tree and don't see make.conf in either etc or etc/defaults. In previous versions, make.conf is in etc/defaults and then you can put your own

Re: make.conf not in -current tree (was cvs commit: src/include stdio.h)

2001-09-21 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): IIRC, it was requested by many that this change be backed out, no? No, the discussion -arch converted to a discussion about the implementation of a world.conf file, which implicits this commit. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make.conf not in -current tree (was cvs commit: src/include stdio.h)

2001-09-20 Thread Vincent Poy
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: peter 2001/09/20 01:47:41 PDT Modified files: include stdio.h Log: Now that the compat4x libc.so.4 binary has been updated, we can finally switch over to using a future-proof stdin/out/err. Note that if you run 4.x

Re: make.conf not in -current tree (was cvs commit: src/include stdio.h)

2001-09-20 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Vincent Poy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I was looking on the -current tree and don't see make.conf in either etc or etc/defaults. In previous versions, make.conf is in etc/defaults and then you can put your own modifications in etc. So any chance of bringing back make.conf into