Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> Doug Barton wrote:

> >       Out of curiosity, what specifically do you not like about it? I realize
> > that not everyone is going to like/use it, but I am always interested in
> > ways to improve the program.
> 
> I don't know about everyone else, but my main beef with it is that it
> doesn't use resources like cvs (when available) to do a smarter 3-way
> merge.  It's got the version ID tags available so it could use that to
> extract the old unmodified version from cvs and use either rcsmerge or
> applying a patch generated by a diff of the old unmodied version and the
> current version.
> 
> This is easier said than done though as the etc files are scattered all
> over the tree. :-/  However, when the path is available (ie: files with
> $FreeBSD$ rather than $Id$) then there is no guessing required.

        This was the most requested feature at FreeBSDCon as well. I don't have
time to add that feature this week, but I will try to do it before the
release. I have looked at adding that, and it looks doable. Obviously
this feature would only be available for files that have $FreeBSD tags,
as I shudder to think what kind of a mess I'd be getting into otherwise.
However your diligent work on that issue should make my job much easier.
:)

Doug
-- 
"Welcome to the desert of the real." 

    - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to