On 11 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, we are still seeing a problem here: we are running uvscan
>> (virus scanner), and while running it we are still seeing increasing unpcb
>> usage and orphaned unix domain sockets.
>>
>> We added some debug pri
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> Now that I've had some time to think about it, if you reuse the same
> fifo, you'll run into the same problem that caused me to abandon my
> previous fifo_inactive() version of the cleanup code, which is stale
> data being left in the fifo after both ends ha
On 11 Nov, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 11 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
>> Sorry, I probably missed an important part: we're creating the FIFOs on
>> nullfs mounts - the test script works great on plain UFS mounts, but the
>> null layer seems to VREF the vnode once again, so v_usecount is 2, thus it
>> is miss
On 11 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, we are still seeing a problem here: we are running uvscan
>> (virus scanner), and while running it we are still seeing increasing unpcb
>> usage and orphaned unix domain sockets.
>>
>> We added some debug pri
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> Unfortunately, we are still seeing a problem here: we are running uvscan
> (virus scanner), and while running it we are still seeing increasing unpcb
> usage and orphaned unix domain sockets.
>
> We added some debug printfs to the fifo routines and found ou
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 10 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> >>
> >> If fifo_open() is interrupted, fifo_close() never gets called, and the
> >> resources are not recovered. I wish doing the resource recovery in
> >> fifo_inactive() would have w
On 10 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 10 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
>> >
>> > The following shell script freezes a machine in several minutes and needs
>> > a power cycle. You can see the increasing memory in vmstat -z (unpcb) and
>> > netstat -u. The kernel is
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 10 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> >
> > The following shell script freezes a machine in several minutes and needs
> > a power cycle. You can see the increasing memory in vmstat -z (unpcb) and
> > netstat -u. The kernel is FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Tue Nov 4 14:08:2
On 10 Nov, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a known problem with named pipes in -CURRENT?
>
> The following shell script freezes a machine in several minutes and needs
> a power cycle. You can see the increasing memory in vmstat -z (unpcb) and
> netstat -u. The kernel is FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT
Hi,
is there a known problem with named pipes in -CURRENT?
The following shell script freezes a machine in several minutes and needs
a power cycle. You can see the increasing memory in vmstat -z (unpcb) and
netstat -u. The kernel is FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Tue Nov 4 14:08:23 CET 2003.
---8<---
#/b
10 matches
Mail list logo