Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Craig Boston wrote: > Well, I haven't had much luck tracking down the exact cause. For some > reason I haven't been able to figure out, all of my crash dumps jump > directly from vn_open_cred (line 185 of vfs_vnops.c) to calltrap(). The > namei call doesn't show up in the stack at all, almost lik

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Lars Eggert wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > Debug: > > > [excellent kernel-debugging recipe snipped] > > Here's a backtrace of a crashdump that should be more helpful: [ ... ] > (kgdb) up 12 > #12 0xc02098a4 in namei (ndp=0x9e) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:158 > 158 FILEDESC_

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-19 Thread Craig Boston
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 16:44, Lars Eggert wrote: > #11 0xc0302ff8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:97 > #12 0xc02098a4 in namei (ndp=0x9e) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:158 > #13 0xc021bcfc in vn_open_cred (ndp=0xeb3b1a44, flagp=0xeb3b1a0c, cmode=0, > cred=0xc2195e80) at /usr/src/sys/kern

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Terry Lambert wrote: Debug: > [excellent kernel-debugging recipe snipped] Here's a backtrace of a crashdump that should be more helpful: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual address = 0x34 fault code = supervisor read, page n

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Lars Eggert wrote: > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = > fault virtual address = 0x34 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01b28a6 [ ... ] > kernel: type 12

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-18 Thread Lars Eggert
Craig Boston wrote: FWIW, this looks nearly identical to the panic I reported last night in the thread "VFS panic (possibly NFS locking related?)". I missed your message, just read it: yes, that sounds similar. I didn't manage to catch the ddb trace and had to work postmortem with a crash dum

Re: panic starting gnome

2003-02-18 Thread Craig Boston
FWIW, this looks nearly identical to the panic I reported last night in the thread "VFS panic (possibly NFS locking related?)". I didn't manage to catch the ddb trace and had to work postmortem with a crash dump and gdb. But it looked just like here. Lars: Do you by any chance have your home dir

panic starting gnome

2003-02-18 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, on today's -current, I get the following panic when starting gnome from xdm; a kernel from 2/10 works with today's world, so it must be something in the kernel that changed over the last week: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual addres