On Saturday, June 02, 2012 2:53:49 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 3. Jan 2012, at 15:36 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 4:29:18 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
no output to this one can we
On 3. Jan 2012, at 15:36 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, January 02, 2012 4:29:18 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:36:50AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
J why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
J no output to this one can we
J
J 1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
J return code or something maybe?), and
J
04.01.2012 13:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Does security_show_success=YES suppress the security report entirely
(no mail sent), if no security related issues found?
Yes.
PS: I also prefer setting *_show_badconfig to 'yes' in case something is
just not working right.
--
Sphinx of black quartz
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:57:53 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:36:50AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
J why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given
there is
J no output to this one can we
J
J 1) suppress the empty sections (to me
On Monday, January 02, 2012 4:29:18 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or something maybe?), and
2) add
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or something maybe?), and
2) add an option to suppress empty periodic emails entirely?
Sample
Hi,
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have been
performed correctly. If it does not contain the section headings
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code or something
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Holger Kipp holger.k...@alogis.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve .
The periodic scripts are badly in need of attention, so effort
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 14:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
How does this look for starters? The attached patch's goal is to
provide a generic, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve
the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve .
The periodic scripts are badly in need of attention, so effort in that
area is much appreciated.
Regarding your patch, rather than copying functions from rc.subr, why
not just source it? Yes, you will get more than you need, but I think
, rc(5)-like infrastructure that would quiet down the
periodic emails for 120.clean-preserve .
The periodic scripts are badly in need of attention, so effort in that
area is much appreciated.
Regarding your patch, rather than copying functions from rc.subr, why
not just source it? Yes, you
On 2. Jan 2012, at 21:56 , Holger Kipp wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net:
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails
It contains the info what has been done, so you know that the jobs have been
performed correctly
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
basedir_show_success variable controls the masking of this
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
On 01/02/2012 15:10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Looking at the scripts, there are bugs where all of the
beforementioned scripts would always be mute (because rc=0 is
explicitly set at the bottom), unless _show_success was set to YES.
Take a look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf
--
You
On 2. Jan 2012, at 23:09 , Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/02/2012 15:01, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Looking at periodic(8) it says:
Each script is required to exit with one of the following values:
0 The script has produced nothing notable in its output. The
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
return code
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
Hi,
why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
no output to this one can we
1) suppress
21 matches
Mail list logo
