Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-04 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Dear Gleb, Yesterday I (finally) got my server back to work and the problem disappear. Can't reproduce it anymore on r258865. On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:54:08PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on trying to mount root from

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-04 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Yesterday I (finally) got my server back to work and the problem disappear. Can't reproduce it anymore on r258865. That is strange. Ok, let's count issue as resolved if it doesn't show up again. -- Totus tuus,

pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if it came via tunnel: pass in quick on $tunnel_if reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \ proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B port

pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if it came via tunnel: pass in quick on $tunnel_if reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \ proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. V I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if V it came via tunnel: V V pass in

Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Dear Gleb, Is kernel rebuilding enuff ? Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. V I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Is kernel rebuilding enuff ? Should be enough wrt pf(4), no API or ABI changes in it. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Dear Gleb, Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on trying to mount root from ssdzfs  (which is my zfs root). Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:54:08PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on trying to mount root from ssdzfs  (which is my zfs root). V Vladimir, You can run the kernel that boots, but update only sys/netpfil/pf directory to