On 8/9/2012 8:26 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>>
>> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new
2012/8/9 Chris Rees :
> On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>>
>> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> > On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> >> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
>> >> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg
On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
> >> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything
is
> >> going in
On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything is
> going into a file based SQLite3 DB?
Also ensure WITH_PKGNG=yes is in your /etc/make.conf. My last comment
s
On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> I tried to switch to the new tool pkg. I'm still installing my ports via
> sources and compiling, but I appreciate the more stable dependency
> tracking of pkg(ng).
> Therefore, I patched, as reuqired and recommended, ports-mgmt/portmaster.
>
> I
Hello.
I tried to switch to the new tool pkg. I'm still installing my ports via
sources and compiling, but I appreciate the more stable dependency
tracking of pkg(ng).
Therefore, I patched, as reuqired and recommended, ports-mgmt/portmaster.
I performed a portmaster --check-depends after I got sev