On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra
> > Hello All,
> > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer
> > errors.
>
> I
> Hello All,
> Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer
> errors.
I can confirm th
Hello All,
Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where multiple
mutexes from the same class are held (as reported recently). I
believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer errors.
Thanks,
--
