On 2013/02/15 05:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 02/14/13 14:19, schrieb Yamaya Takashi:
On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins
Peter Pentchev wrote this message on Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 16:34 +0200:
There are some people - and some of them are well-respected long-term
Free-and-other-BSD developers - who are of the opinion that the
/usr/share/mk/bsd.*.mk infrastructure is meant for the base system build
only. I do
14.02.2013 09:34, Peter Pentchev ???(??):
However, there is then the argument of well, if you want to use the bsd.*.mk
infrastructure, then why don't you just copy it into your project and include
it from there - just like many, many projects do with, say, the sys/queue.h
header, or parts
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:32 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
14.02.2013 09:34, Peter Pentchev ???(??):
However, there is then the argument of well, if you want to use the
bsd.*.mk
infrastructure, then why don't you just copy it into your project and
include
it from there - just like
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 23:09 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
15.02.2013 19:12, Ian Lepore ???(??):
The src.conf manpage is not in error. The intent is that src.conf
applies only to the building of the freebsd world and kernel, that is,
the source that's usually located under /usr/src. If
15.02.2013 19:12, Ian Lepore ???(??):
The src.conf manpage is not in error. The intent is that src.conf
applies only to the building of the freebsd world and kernel, that is,
the source that's usually located under /usr/src. If settings from
src.conf are leaking into other builds, the
13.02.2013 11:22, O. Hartmann написав(ла):
If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use
bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from
the source tree?
-Kimmo
For one, the particular port (its Makefile.bsd) was created in 2001,
five years
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
13.02.2013 11:22, O. Hartmann написав(ла):
If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use
bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from
the source tree?
-Kimmo
For
14.02.2013 08:02, Tom Evans написав(ла):
I think src.conf is meant only to be included when building src. For
example, bsd.port.mk sets _WITHOUT_SRCCONF before including bsd.own.mk
(which is the makefile that includes src.conf). It's done this since
src.conf was added in 2006, so evidently
On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that this singular port
(and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
years before src.conf (and its man-page) was added to the tree.
-mi
14.02.2013 08:55, Tom Evans написав(ла):
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that this singular
port
(and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
years before src.conf
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:55:58PM +, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that this singular port
(and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
years
Am 02/14/13 14:19, schrieb Yamaya Takashi:
On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port
grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options.
As far a sI
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port
grahpics/libfpx complaining about
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
which do
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+=
Am 02/13/13 15:05, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in
19 matches
Mail list logo
