The testing I've done shows that postfix is buggy in two ways:
- The main() in inet_addr_local.c assumes that the addresses in
addr_list and mask_list are sockaddrs, but this is only true
when using IPv6. This only affects testing with -DTEST.
- inet_addr_local() calls inet_addr_list_append(..
From the keyboard of Hellmuth Michaelis:
> Perhaps i can find out more later as i now have to tell my kids
> a goodnight story
How good that i did that - on today´s current postfix runs again
Anyway, the time i intended to work on -current and commit some bits to
it was once again jus
On Friday 07 September 2001 09:54 am, Michael Harnois wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:03:00 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hellmuth Michaelis)
said:
> > After the reboot i tried postfix:
> >
> > Sep 7 16:19:49 hmscrap postfix[372]: fatal: could not find any
> > active network
From the keyboard of Michael Harnois:
> > Sep 7 16:19:49 hmscrap postfix[372]: fatal: could not find any
> > active network interfaces
>
> Do you have a way to try dhclient? As I said, that failed with a
> similar error for me.
I´ll see if i can try.
In the meantime i tried to find ou
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:03:00 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hellmuth Michaelis) said:
> After the reboot i tried postfix:
> Sep 7 16:19:49 hmscrap postfix[372]: fatal: could not find any
> active network interfaces
Do you have a way to try dhclient? As I said, that failed with a
Ok, today in the morning i checked a fresh current tree out to a different
machine which just got done with a make build/installworld, new kernel and
a mergemaster run.
Before i did that, i updated the postfix port, compiled it and verified it
works (this was on a current as of August 1st).
Aft
From the keyboard of Hellmuth Michaelis:
> From the keyboard of Giorgos Keramidas:
>
> > Hmm ..
> >
> > thought i should update my current machine 2 hours ago, cvs´d a tree, made
> > and installed it. Reboot. Got:
> >
> > Sep 6 21:33:48 bert postfix[15838]: fatal: could not find any active ne
From the keyboard of Giorgos Keramidas:
> Hmm ..
>
> thought i should update my current machine 2 hours ago, cvs´d a tree, made
> and installed it. Reboot. Got:
>
> Sep 6 21:33:48 bert postfix[15838]: fatal: could not find any active network
interfaces
>ifconfig output please ?
Nothing has
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 03:49:38 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ifconfig output please ?
On the bad kernel, an ifconfig shows that the network card for my
outside interface has an ipaddr of 0.0.0.0. When I try to run dhclient
manually on the interface it says "dc0: not found
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:46:15 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hellmuth Michaelis) said:
> Sep 6 21:33:48 bert postfix[15838]: fatal: could not find any
> active network interfaces
I'm having a similar experience here.
--
Michael D. Harnois bilocational bivocational
From: Hellmuth Michaelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: postfix fails to start
Date: Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:46:15PM +0200
> Hmm ..
>
> thought i should update my current machine 2 hours ago, cvs´d a tree, made
> and installed it. Reboot. Got:
>
> Sep 6 21:33:48 be
Hmm ..
thought i should update my current machine 2 hours ago, cvs´d a tree, made
and installed it. Reboot. Got:
Sep 6 21:33:48 bert postfix[15838]: fatal: could not find any active network
interfaces
With the previous binary, a 4.3 CD binary, a then newly compiled postfix and
postfix-curren
12 matches
Mail list logo
