On Monday, August 01, 2011 1:44:18 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 12:17 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, August 01, 2011 10:28:21 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > on 01/08/2011 15:47 John Baldwin said the following:
> > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:22:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote
On Monday 01 August 2011 12:17 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, August 01, 2011 10:28:21 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 01/08/2011 15:47 John Baldwin said the following:
> > > On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:22:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >> Just an observation:
> > >> - print_INTEL_info and print
On Monday, August 01, 2011 10:28:21 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/08/2011 15:47 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:22:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >> Just an observation:
> >> - print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c
> >> - print_IN
on 01/08/2011 15:47 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:22:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Just an observation:
>> - print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c
>> - print_INTEL_TLB doesn't cover all the codes defined by Intel specs
>> - not sur
On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:22:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Just an observation:
> - print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c
> - print_INTEL_TLB doesn't cover all the codes defined by Intel specs
> - not sure; perhaps print_INTEL_info should use deterministic cache
Just an observation:
- print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c
- print_INTEL_TLB doesn't cover all the codes defined by Intel specs
- not sure; perhaps print_INTEL_info should use deterministic cache parameters
as provided by CPUID 0x4 for a more complete coverage...
