Re: problem with 1GB pages?

2011-11-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
Please disregard my report. I've tracked the problem to one of the new modules being faulty. But memtest86* tools still don't detect any issues with it. Apparently FreeBSD is a much more thorough memory tester than the specialized tools :-) Apologies for the noise. on 12/11/2011 12:47 Andriy

Re: problem with 1GB pages?

2011-11-14 Thread Alan Cox
On 11/14/2011 03:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: Please disregard my report. I've tracked the problem to one of the new modules being faulty. But memtest86* tools still don't detect any issues with it. Apparently FreeBSD is a much more thorough memory tester than the specialized tools :-) Apologies

Re: problem with 1GB pages?

2011-11-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/11/2011 19:01 Alan Cox said the following: On 11/14/2011 03:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: Please disregard my report. I've tracked the problem to one of the new modules being faulty. But memtest86* tools still don't detect any issues with it. Apparently FreeBSD is a much more thorough

problem with 1GB pages?

2011-11-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
Introduction. I have an AMD-based system with a Fam10h CPU (with 1GB pages support), the system chipset contains an integrated graphics device (that uses a region of the main memory as a graphics memory). The chipset supports memory hoisting to compensate for the PCI memory window and the