Re: protecting from attacks

1999-10-29 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > however if a limited > user is able to take down a box we want to hear about it. Take a look at my posting with "VM DOS attack" subject. -Maxim -- "We believe in the Power and the Might!" (Manowar, 1996) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

RE: protecting from attacks

1999-10-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Luke wrote: > I have been trying to figure out a sane method of stopping this one: > while(1) { > fork(); > } > > on a machine with no limits the load went to 290+ I tried fiddling with > limits and got it down to making the load 2-3 but the limits are ridiculous. > I didn't

RE: protecting from attacks

1999-10-29 Thread Adam Strohl
I seem to recall allowing a limit for max processes when I was looking at fork bombs back in '95 ... ahh the memories. - ( Adam Strohl ) - - UNIX Operations/Systems http://www.digitalspark.net - - adams (at) digitalspark.net

RE: protecting from attacks

1999-10-29 Thread Luke
I have been trying to figure out a sane method of stopping this one: while(1) { fork(); } on a machine with no limits the load went to 290+ I tried fiddling with limits and got it down to making the load 2-3 but the limits are ridiculous. I didn't look in mail archives so sorry if this has been d