On Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:27:12 PST, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I shudder to think that people might actually start depending on this
non-feature.
Your shuddering comes too late. :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 16:27:12 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Matthew Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we
:Matthew are at it considering how much of a security hole it is.
:
:I wouldn't nuke it completely. Make -e a noop unless the real uid ps
:is
"Matthew" == Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we
Matthew are at it considering how much of a security hole it is.
I wouldn't nuke it completely. Make -e a noop unless the real uid ps
is running with matches the
At 3:48 PM -0700 11/15/99, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
"Matthew" == Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we
Matthew are at it considering how much of a security hole it is.
I wouldn't nuke it completely. Make -e a noop
:Matthew Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we
:Matthew are at it considering how much of a security hole it is.
:
:I wouldn't nuke it completely. Make -e a noop unless the real uid ps
:is running with matches the effective uid of the process being reported.
:And if ps
