[Donning asbestos underwear]
With the FreeBSD 4.0 code freeze fast approaching, are there any
compelling reasons to keep enigma (src/usr.bin/enigma) in the
source tree? Yes, I know it is a *small* utility, but
1. it provides rather weak encryption,
2. the crypto-distribution is available with
From: Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:20:19 -0800 (PST)
With the FreeBSD 4.0 code freeze fast approaching, are there any
compelling reasons to keep enigma (src/usr.bin/enigma) in the
source tree? Yes, I know it is a *small* utility, but
1. it provides rather weak
With the FreeBSD 4.0 code freeze fast approaching, are there any
compelling reasons to keep enigma (src/usr.bin/enigma) in the
source tree?
How dare you be so anti-bloat, living so close to Redmond?:-)
[But otherwise a nice place, Seattle. I used to live there]
Enigma is just a format
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:09:11PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Bakul Shah remarked
Enigma is just a format converter at this point and should be
left around (after renaming it crypt -- which is how it is
known on all Unix versions older than 10 years). Some of us
Renaming?
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 03:26:34PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:09:11PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Bakul Shah remarked
Enigma is just a format converter at this point and should be
left around (after renaming it crypt -- which is how it is
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:09:11PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Bakul Shah remarked
Enigma is just a format converter at this point and should be
left around (after renaming it crypt -- which is how it is
known on all Unix versions
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:36:12PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that James Howard remarked
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
[15:25:53] mortis:~
(ttyp9):{838}% ll -i `which crypt` `which enigma`
23155 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4980 Oct 29 13:47 /usr/bin/crypt*
23155
