At 6:16 PM -0400 8/11/03, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and
if so could someone tell what they are. I am interested in
building dual system using mp's but not sure which version
would be better.
I run 5.x on a dual-Althon 2000 machine. I have no idea
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
mp's but not sure which version would be
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
mp's but not sure which version would be
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
mp's but not sure which version would be better.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: smp in 5.1
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:21 -0400 (EDT)
I guess I'll chime in as well... I have a Dual Athlon 2000+ MP here and
it's running like a charm with SCHED_4BSD.
Andy
Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant
Silicon Landmark, LLC
PM
To: Andy Farkas
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eriq Lamar
Subject: Re: smp in 5.1
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so
could someone tell what they are. I am
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
mp's but not sure which version would be better.
Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even
, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: Andy Farkas
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eriq Lamar
Subject: Re: smp in 5.1
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so
could someone tell what
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Killing wrote:
Halting them will still cause the CPUs to be detected. They just won't do
any useful work.
Yep but the issue is that all the core admin tools are unaware of this and
hence include the virtual cores in idle calcs etc making load monitoring
impossible
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Steven Hartland wrote:
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus:
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1
Halting them will still cause the CPUs to be detected. They just won't do
any useful work.
Relevant sections from dmesg:
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 - irq 0
- Original Message -
From: Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus:
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1
Halting them will still cause the CPUs to be detected. They just won't do
any useful work.
Yep but the issue is that all the core admin tools are unaware of this
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Killing wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus:
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1
Halting them will still cause the CPUs to be detected. They just won't do
any useful work.
Yep but the issue is that
Well, hyperthreading can be disabled via a kernel directive, right?
From what I've seen that was removed between 5.0 and 5.1 correct
me if Im wrong.
Which ever it needs someone to pick it up ASAP dont you think?
Really? What's the hurry? FreeBSD 5.x isn't even bootable/installable
Killing wrote this message on Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 18:47 +0100:
I suppose the hurry is that basic utils that we use day to day like top
and vmstat to monitor machine load cannot be trusted to give accurate
info.
Actually, the basic tools ARE correct, there is a cpu sitting idle that
the
Original Message -
From: John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes 5.X is still new tech and may not run on all machines but on the ones
which it does ( and it runs very well here ) basic tools are required. If
it doesn't run on a machine your under know false impressions, if however
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus:
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1
Relevant sections from dmesg:
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 - irq 0
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0,
16 matches
Mail list logo
