Hi,
>
> Write cacheing is automatically enabled if tagged queueing is enabled
> and supported by the disk, so I doubt you're seeing any improvement at
> all.
I must admit: My statements are based on experience with SCSI Tagged Queuing
and SCSI Write Cache. I hope I'm correct if I assume that th
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
> write cache and ata tags.
>
> My question is:
>
> It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
>
> I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
> (wi
Matthias Schuendehuette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
> and working.
> (The performace gain of WriteCache and TaggedQueuing is more or less the
> same, the combination of both adds less than 10% of performance and you
> shou
Hi,
> Is it safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
The summary of *my* experience and knowledge is:
It is considered *unsave* to use Soft Updates with WriteCache enabled.
I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
and working.
(The performace
Hello to all,
I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
write cache and ata tags.
My question is:
It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
(without ata tags) and if
