>I meant sysinstall generating cons25 output. But there were recently a
>lot of terminfo changes that may have caused this.
Oh. sysinstall asked if I wanted ANSI, vt100, cons25, something else
related to FreeBSD console, or xterm. Most of those options were wrong,
which is the bug that I think
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bill Fenner wrote:
> screen(1) says "Each virtual terminal provides the functions of a DEC
> VT100 terminal and, in addition, several control functions from the ISO
> 6492 ... and ISO 2022 standards ...".
I meant sysinstall generating cons25 output. But there were recently a
screen(1) says "Each virtual terminal provides the functions of a DEC
VT100 terminal and, in addition, several control functions from the ISO
6492 ... and ISO 2022 standards ...".
I took that to mean that it provides a vt100 interface. That's also
been my experience in the last 8 years of using
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I installed 5.0-RC1 on a Sun Ultra-60 a couple of days ago.
> The biggest problem that I ran into was terminal emulation
> inside sysinstall.
>
> I normally do most tasks inside screen, so I tried selecting
> the vt100 emulation (since that's what screen t
I installed 5.0-RC1 on a Sun Ultra-60 a couple of days ago.
The biggest problem that I ran into was terminal emulation
inside sysinstall.
I normally do most tasks inside screen, so I tried selecting
the vt100 emulation (since that's what screen tries to be).
However, it uses something that screen
