on 22/11/2010 16:30 John Baldwin said the following:
No. Especially since the structure is private it can always be revived if a
use is found for it. You can probably leave the taskqueue_create() API the
same for now though.
OK. Committed.
Thank you!
--
Andriy Gapon
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 5:00:34 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/11/2010 18:58 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all.
Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a
on 19/11/2010 18:58 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all.
Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a debugger, though.
If it's not used anywhere I would just drop it.
on 16/11/2010 15:27 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current
taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter
internally. Thus it depends on
On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/11/2010 15:27 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current
taskqueue_create() implementation just
taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current
taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter
internally. Thus it depends on the 'name' having a life time encompassing that
of
the taskqueue.
I think that alternatively we could have copied the
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current
taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter
internally. Thus it depends on the 'name' having a life time encompassing
that of
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:27:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current
taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter
internally. Thus
