Chris,
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 10:35:17AM -0700, Chris wrote:
C> > the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
C> > in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
C> > and fails to compile after changes to them. So the tool that
C> > nobody uses requires
> On 5. Nov 2022, at 01:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> In message , Gleb Smirnoff writes:
>> Max,
>>
>> the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
>> in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
>> and fails to compile after changes to them. So the tool that
In message , Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> Max,
>
> the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
> in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
> and fails to compile after changes to them. So the tool that
> nobody uses requires special care when working on TCP.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 1:19 AM Max Baroi wrote:
> I'm sorry if this is an inappropriate suggestion, but I think it would be
> neat if there was a place in the ports hierarchy for retired programs like
> trpt. Maybe a "historical" or "archival" directory for programs phased out
> of from base,
On 2022-11-04 09:40, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Max,
the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
and fails to compile after changes to them. So the tool that
nobody uses requires special care when working on TCP. The
Gleb,
Thank you for the response. I rescind my suggestion.
-Max
On 11/4/2022 9:40 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Max,
the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
and fails to compile after changes to them. So the
Max,
the reason I want to retire it is not that it consumes 40 Kb
in the repository. The reason is that knows kernel structures,
and fails to compile after changes to them. So the tool that
nobody uses requires special care when working on TCP. The
kernel headers disclose the structures for
I'm sorry if this is an inappropriate suggestion, but I think it would be neat
if there was a place in the ports hierarchy for retired programs like trpt.
Maybe a "historical" or "archival" directory for programs phased out of from
base, especially ones that are almost four decades old.
-Max
On 3 Nov 2022, at 22:48, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trpt(8) is utility to pull TCP debugging data from the kernel
> in 4.2BSD. We still have it in the base, with corresponding
> TCPDEBUG option in the kernel and SO_DEBUG socket option.
>
> At the same time we have much more powerful
Hi,
trpt(8) is utility to pull TCP debugging data from the kernel
in 4.2BSD. We still have it in the base, with corresponding
TCPDEBUG option in the kernel and SO_DEBUG socket option.
At the same time we have much more powerful debugging facilities
for TCP, e.g. the Dtrace probing, the TCP
10 matches
Mail list logo
