On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:48:53PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Daichi,
I think Keith Packard of Xorg once wrote a commit message along the
lines of 5000 lines of code removed, feature added This seems to be
similar, albeit on a smaller scale. ;-)
Apart from this issue with unionfs, I am
Hi all,
Even though the proposed fix for unionfs would still be nice to have in
SVN, I just wrote a patch for tmpfs to add support for whiteouts:
http://80386.nl/pub/tmpfs-whiteout.txt
Basically I've implemented it by allowing directory entries to refer to
NULL inodes, to indicate the
Hi Ed and unionfs fan gyus.
Ed pointed out a contradict behavior between current
unionfs implementation and its manual, and sent me a
patch.
Thanks Ed ;)
Index: sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c
===
---
Hi Daichi,
I think Keith Packard of Xorg once wrote a commit message along the
lines of 5000 lines of code removed, feature added This seems to be
similar, albeit on a smaller scale. ;-)
Apart from this issue with unionfs, I am also experiencing another
issue, where for some reason I cannot
* Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
What you are trying to do here is to mount /dev/iso9660/freebsd for the
second time? This is not supported. The check is there to prevent doing
this, as it will panic on you when you try to unmount first mount (not
really a problem in your case, as
Hi Ed and unionfs fan gyus.
Ed pointed out a contradict behavior between current
unionfs implementation and its manual, and sent me a
patch.
Thanks Ed ;)
Index: sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c
===
---
