Andrew Reilly wrote:
Was this the result of the umass/da driver having a different
synthetic geometry calculation routine than the SATA driver?
ATA and SCSI disk drivers indeed have different geometry calculation
algorithms. ATA fetches geometry from DEVICE IDENTIFY data, while SCSI
seems just
Hi all,
Sorry to interrupt this thread with an off-topic question, but
it seems vaguely related, and you folk seem to be the right ones
to ask:
I've recently done a drive upgrade in a 1U rack machine that
only had space for the two active drives that were in it, and I
couldn't afford the
