On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
log spam.
If it's the same
On 14 Jun 2010, at 03:11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from
Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/wpa_supplicant-update--CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS-tp28870665p28870665.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
log spam.
If it's the same problem, looks like it's fixed in v0.6.10
:
http://old.nabble.com/wpa_supplicant-update--CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS-tp28870665p28873483.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 13 Jun 2010, at 12:40, Jakub Lach wrote:
Rui Paulo-3 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
I'll likely work on this soon.
--
Rui Paulo
That's splendid, thanks for fast reply.
Is MFC to 8 feasible?
to 8 feasible?
Possibly, but it won't make it in time for 8.1.
That's understandable, I track STABLE anyway
(since 8 became STABLE as a matter of fact).
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/wpa_supplicant-update--CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
