Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-01 Thread Gustau Pérez
On 01/12/2011 00:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/12/2011 01:27 Jung-uk Kim said the following: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: Using new

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-01 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. on 27/11/2011

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

2011-12-01 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote: On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

2011-12-01 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote: On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote: On Tue,

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

2011-12-01 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 1 December 2011 13:17, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote: On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote: On 29

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Sevan, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.comwrote: On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with profile support. sorry, I meant *without* profile support. Are you sure you mean profile

pf.conf + IPV6 to IPV4 port rdr

2011-12-01 Thread Dan The Man
pfctl -v -s nat rdr inet6 proto tcp from any to 2001:49f0:4004::/48 port = 9191 - :::67.159.46.238 [ Evaluations: 512 Packets: 3 Bytes: 228 States: 1 ] [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 80940 State Creations: 2 ] I can see here that after i tried on another host to

Re: man ugen error

2011-12-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote: According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with device ugen in config file. I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 to RC2, but the kernel build stopped quickly with the

stupid cp(1) behaviour

2011-12-01 Thread Alexander Best
is there a chance to change cp's behaviour in connection with the -R switch, so that it stops after the first error? i just ran into the following situation: 1) cp -ai bla /mnt/umass 2) i got a lot of warnings that /mnt/umass was full 3) cp -an bla /mnt/umass 4) ...that didn't work, since cp

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 1 December 2011 10:44, Max Khon f...@samodelkin.net wrote: Are you sure you mean profile support and not CTF data? Hi Max, I mean profile support. Havent tested on 9.0, but definitely the case with prior versions. Will try repeat the process report back if this is not a common occurrence

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a multiple openable device

2011-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:41:25 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 13:43:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:15:11 am Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM,

lock order reversals with netmap

2011-12-01 Thread Rene Ladan
Hi, on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011 (GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied) I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program (details in the attachment) with syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl): Dec 1

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-01 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 01 December 2011 03:37 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. Can't

Re: man ugen error

2011-12-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:44:13 Thomas Mueller wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote: According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with device ugen in config file. I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD

Re: lock order reversals with netmap

2011-12-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote: Hi, on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011 (GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied) I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program (details in the

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
[cc list trimmed] on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following: On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07 pm John Baldwin wrote: Hmmm, you could also make critical_exit() not

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread Freddie Cash
So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how about the OP's original request: make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s is used? :) [Thought I'd bring the thread back around to it's original purpose.] -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com

Re: Console Spam: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-73.0C) [solved]

2011-12-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:55 -0800, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following: I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Garrett, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: What I really want is this: $ cat Makefile all: foo bar baz yadda foo bar yadda: baz: false $ gmake false gmake: *** [baz] Error 1 $ make all false *** Error

Looking to start Testing 10-current on Vbox

2011-12-01 Thread list, mailing
I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own. I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ Last update was 201107 Where do I get the Current snapshot of 10. (Or do I upgrade from 9.0-RC2)? Thanks -- Ben Adams http://www.SpryMed.com/ ___

Re: lock order reversals with netmap

2011-12-01 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote: Hi, on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011 (GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied) I get these lock order

Malformed conditional (${MK_CTF} != no)

2011-12-01 Thread Sean Bruno
I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes? [seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make === firewire (all) /usr/home/seanb/head/sys/modules/firewire/firewire/../../../conf/kmod.mk, line 204: Malformed conditional

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote: [cc list trimmed] on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following: On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07

Re: Malformed conditional (${MK_CTF} != no)

2011-12-01 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 1, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes? [seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make === firewire (all)

Re: Malformed conditional (${MK_CTF} != no) [solved]

2011-12-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:56 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: to workaround this issue -- or just install all of the include Makefiles there, via (cd ~/head/share/mk; make -m `pwd` install) Thanks amigo. sean ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

ahci in FreeBSD 9

2011-12-01 Thread George Kontostanos
Hi everyone, From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been integrated into kernel: It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but option ATA_CAM should remain in kernel configuration to make ata module work as CAM driver supporting

Re: stupid cp(1) behaviour

2011-12-01 Thread Matt Mullins
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but a file's checksum. You can always use net/rsync, which does by default compare checksums. -- Matt Mullins

r227487 breaks C++ programs that use __isthreaded

2011-12-01 Thread George Liaskos
Hello One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended? [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc Regards, George ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote: [cc list trimmed] on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following: On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote: [cc list trimmed] on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following: On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32

Re: r227487 breaks C++ programs that use __isthreaded

2011-12-01 Thread David Schultz
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011, George Liaskos wrote: Hello One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended? [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc This code uses an unportable workaround for a bug that I believe was fixed in

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch? I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the SCHEDULER_STOPPED thing. commit

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how about the OP's original request:    make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s is used?  :) [Thought I'd bring the

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a multiple openable device

2011-12-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the cv_wait call

Re: ahci in FreeBSD 9

2011-12-01 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200 George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been integrated into kernel: It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but option

Re: Using Instruction Pointer address in debug interfaces [Was: Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]]

2011-12-01 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: you (committers) I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say you (committers) any more... :-) The real question is rather whether

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: ? ? pmake sucks as far as

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review? I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too. We should reduce the needless diversion between the two makes. -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org)

Re: stupid cp(1) behaviour

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:35:50AM -0800, Matt Mullins wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but a file's checksum. You can always use net/rsync, which does by default

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review? I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too. We should reduce the needless

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately. I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on my system or I don't. Again, what problem are you trying to solve? The question is what to do with gdb

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions? On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote: Author: fjoe Date: Tue Nov 29 19:46:17 2011 New Revision: 228143 URL:

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit after r228114. The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: 1) just build link gdb with libedit OR 2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit after r228114. The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: 1) just build link gdb

Re: stupid cp(1) behaviour

2011-12-01 Thread Eitan Adler
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Matt Mullins mokom...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but a file's checksum. You can always use net/rsync, which does by

Re: Stop scheduler on panic

2011-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On 12/1/11 4:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following: On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch? I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Brooks, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: What is the value in doing either? libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2. Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of libedit still doesn't work quite the

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to invert a 17 year default. I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT. If you like, add it to the list of things to disable on

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately. I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on my system or I don't. What I meant is that this problem is not related to the

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions? On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote: Author: fjoe Date:

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up with a libreadline on the system anyway. Then you need to define what

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions? On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote: Author: fjoe Date: Tue Nov 29

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to invert a 17 year default. I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Steve, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote: David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions? On Tue, Nov 29,

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote: Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their code when someone changes a library and that change causes a dramatic change in the performance of one's code. And as Max pointed

Re: Upgrade contributed gperf, m4 and flex

2011-12-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4 upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib/ patches can be found there: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/flex-update.diff Hi Baptiste, I

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote: Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their code when someone changes a library and that change causes a

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/01/2011 23:23, Steve Kargl wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote: Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their code when someone changes a

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
Quick! Martinis for all conversation participants, stat! Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org