Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: The documentation says that /etc/pam.conf is only used if /etc/pam.d/service-name isn't found, and the code appears to agree with that, however this doesn't seem to be working as expected after the latest import of PAM. The culprit was this commit:

Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Jan, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: The documentation says that /etc/pam.conf is only used if /etc/pam.d/service-name isn't found, and the code appears to agree with that, however this doesn't seem to be working as expected after the latest import of

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Linimon
On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown

Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: The culprit was this commit: http://trac.des.no/openpam/changeset/487/trunk/lib/openpam_configure.c However, I'm not confident that simply reverting this commit is the right way to go. Thanks for the

Re: FS hang when creating snapshots on a UFS SU+J setup

2012-01-09 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
Hello, I'm sorry to bother you, but you may not be aware of this thread and this problem. We are several people experiencing deadlocks, kernel panics and other problems when creating sanpshots on file systems with SU+J. It would be nice to get some feedback, e.g. how can we help debugging and /

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases'

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@,

Re: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

2012-01-09 Thread Ed Maste
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:47:41PM +, Nima Misaghian wrote: We have added firmware download command to atacontrol at work, for which I have attached a patch against 8.2 to this email. The format of the command is similar to the camcontrol counterpart: atacontrol fwdownload device_name

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Linimon
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent!  You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence I am being sarcastic because I am frustrated. I am frustrated because I

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged

Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Jan, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: The culprit was this commit: http://trac.des.no/openpam/changeset/487/trunk/lib/openpam_configure.c However, I'm not confident that simply reverting this commit is the

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been

Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: After staring at the code a lot more, I see your point about the loss of information. The problem is that openpam_parse_chain() returns PAM_SUCCESS whether or not if found anything, but we want the loop to terminate when either an error is detected or if

Re: couldn't log on to my -CURRENT machine after upgrade to latest PAM

2012-01-09 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Jan, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org writes: After staring at the code a lot more, I see your point about the loss of information. The problem is that openpam_parse_chain() returns PAM_SUCCESS whether or not if found anything, but we want the loop to terminate

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that

CXXFLAGS example in share/examples/etc/make.conf should to be updated

2012-01-09 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, would it be possible to update the CXXFLAGS example in share/examples/etc/make.conf? looking at the gcc(1) man page, -fconserve-space seems to be a bad example. can somebody thing of a C++ specific option which makes more sense? or maybe something like -Weffc++? although idealy this

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 9 January 2012 21:06, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan

Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled?

2012-01-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot GENERIC... I don't want to break that. :) I Just don't want to compile it in unless I'm using NFS/ZFS, and on my 4MB flash boards I'm not booting