Re: Shuttle DS47 - Realtek RT 8111G

2013-10-29 Thread Yonghyeon PYUN
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:04:28PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Yonghyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 08:47:06PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: Index: sys/dev/re/if_re.c === ---

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 01:00:21 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 01:00:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Shuttle DS47 - Realtek RT 8111G

2013-10-29 Thread Scott Long
On Oct 29, 2013, at 12:14 AM, Yonghyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: I tested the 0x4c0 on real hardware. an MSI Z87I motherboard. The rest came from looking at the linux driver. That driver is structured very differently (and better, IMHO) than the FreeBSD one, so there's a lot that

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 now available

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Dupre
Glen Barber ha scritto: Important note to freebsd-update(8) users: Please be sure to follow the instructions in the EN-13:04.freebsd-update errata notice here before upgrading the system to 10.0-BETA2: I'd say these instructions extracted partially from the advisory are very very confusing

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 now available

2013-10-29 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:02:45AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Glen Barber ha scritto: Important note to freebsd-update(8) users: Please be sure to follow the instructions in the EN-13:04.freebsd-update errata notice here before upgrading the system to 10.0-BETA2: I'd say these instructions

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 06:12:10 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 06:12:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 05:38:18 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 05:38:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 now available

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Glen Barber ha scritto: For this announcement, I felt it was safer to include the instructions from the EN verbatim; for future 10.0 builds, it will be less verbose. The problem was that the instructions were not verbatim, you omitted (perhaps by

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 now available

2013-10-29 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:19:57AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Glen Barber ha scritto: For this announcement, I felt it was safer to include the instructions from the EN verbatim; for future 10.0 builds, it will be less verbose. The problem was that the instructions were not verbatim, you

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Bjoern, in r256868 you said that now netback compiles w/o INET. How did that work for you? See below: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:52:34AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: F TB --- 2013-10-29 06:35:43 - /usr/bin/make -B buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT-NOIP F Kernel build for LINT-NOIP started on

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 06:52:34 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 06:52:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 07:24:20 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 07:24:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-29 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hello, [adding Boris to Cc, who reported same issue in private email] On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote: M I've encountered problems with installing FreeBSD-10.0-BETA1 i386 under M VirtualBox. M The problem is with setting/changing root password during install

Re: make delete-old broken

2013-10-29 Thread Alexander Panyushkin
Hello FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 #0 r257316: Tue Oct 29 12:46:22 EET 2013 root:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Kernel amd64 Build without error. root make delete-old delete-old-libs Removing old files (only deletes safe to delete libs) make[3]: chdir /usr/obj/usr/src/release: No such file or directory

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (FUSE related?)

2013-10-29 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi again, I was running out of space on my UFS partition and decided to use big NTFS one I also have on the drive. I've mounted it with ntfs-3g and our native fuse.ko. I needed the scratch space to built Open/LibreOffice on it *LOL*. Well, it failed with a panic (see the excerpt from text core

Re: Shuttle DS47 - Realtek RT 8111G

2013-10-29 Thread Thomas Guldener
Great news - thx for the work g. thomas On 29 Oct 2013, at 07:14, Yonghyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:04:28PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Yonghyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 08:47:06PM -0600, Scott Long

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-29 Thread Maciej Milewski
On 29.10.2013 12:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello, [adding Boris to Cc, who reported same issue in private email] On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote: M I've encountered problems with installing FreeBSD-10.0-BETA1 i386 under M VirtualBox. M The problem is with

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-29 Thread Maciej Milewski
On 29.10.2013 12:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello, [adding Boris to Cc, who reported same issue in private email] On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote: M I've encountered problems with installing FreeBSD-10.0-BETA1 i386 under M VirtualBox. M The problem is with

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Bjoern, in r256868 you said that now netback compiles w/o INET. So it had for ages according to the tinderbox with all LINT kernels, and it had after my change. My change just also allowed a GENERIC to compile without INET as well (I think someone

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:55:57PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: B B Bjoern, B B in r256868 you said that now netback compiles w/o INET. B B So it had for ages according to the tinderbox with all LINT kernels, B and it had after my change. Well, I

Re: buildworld failure: pfvar.h:44 #include netpfil/pf/pf.h not found

2013-10-29 Thread dt71
Gleb Smirnoff wrote, On 10/29/2013 05:19: +1 patch. So far, so good: === usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump (depend) rm -f version.c ; sed 's/.*/char version[] = ;/' /usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contrib/tcpdump/VERSION version.c rm -f .depend CC='/i/a/clang

Re: buildworld failure: pfvar.h:44 #include netpfil/pf/pf.h not found

2013-10-29 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:36:17PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote: d Gleb Smirnoff wrote, On 10/29/2013 05:19: d +1 patch. d So far, so good: d d === usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump (depend) +1 patch -- Totus tuus, Glebius. Index: contrib/tcpdump/print-ip.c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 14:08:53 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 14:08:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

hwpstate0: set freq failed patch

2013-10-29 Thread Claudio Zumbo
Hello, Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html I've tested it on an amd 6600k and it seems to be working, a quick google search shows other people have had good results on different cpus.

Re: make delete-old broken

2013-10-29 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:26+0200, Alexander Panyushkin wrote: Hello FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 #0 r257316: Tue Oct 29 12:46:22 EET 2013 root:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Kernel amd64 Build without error. root make delete-old delete-old-libs Removing old files (only deletes safe to delete libs)

Re: hwpstate0: set freq failed patch

2013-10-29 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27, Claudio Zumbo wrote: Hello, Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html I've tested it on an amd 6600k and it seems to be working, a quick google search

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

taskqueue_enqueue_fast in freebsd 10.0-current

2013-10-29 Thread Venkata Duvvuru
Hi, In Freebsd 10.0-current with Emulex's OCE driver, I observe that the bottom half is hogging all the CPU which is leading to system sluggishness. I used the same hardware to check the behavior on 9.1-RELEASE, everything is fine, bottom half is not taking more than 10% of the CPU even at the

Re: hwpstate0: set freq failed patch

2013-10-29 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 29/10/2013 17:00 Mark Felder said the following: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27, Claudio Zumbo wrote: Hello, Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html I've tested it on an amd 6600k and

Re: taskqueue_enqueue_fast in freebsd 10.0-current

2013-10-29 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, On 29 October 2013 08:10, Venkata Duvvuru venkatkumar.duvv...@emulex.com wrote: Hi, In Freebsd 10.0-current with Emulex's OCE driver, I observe that the bottom half is hogging all the CPU which is leading to system sluggishness. I used the same hardware to check the behavior on

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 10:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: buildworld failure: pfvar.h:44 #include netpfil/pf/pf.h not found

2013-10-29 Thread dt71
Gleb Smirnoff wrote, On 10/29/2013 14:43: d === usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump (depend) +1 patch Success! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 15:51:34 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 15:51:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 15:23:09 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 15:23:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[misc/183407] Routing restart returns non-zero exitcode

2013-10-29 Thread Abhishek [ABK] Kumar
misc/183407: Routing restart returns non-zero exitcode in case of no extra routing parameter or missing atm/ipx *Environment* FreeBSD h4ck3r.freebsd.org 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898: Thu Sep 26 22:50:31 UTC 2013 r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 16:37:05 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 16:37:05 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Can't compile USE_GCC ports

2013-10-29 Thread Martin Dieringer
I recently updated to FreeBSD-10. The error is always at linking, see below. Any idea what I may have messed up in the system? gmake[5]: Entering directory `/ports/devel/nemiver/work/nemiver-0.8.2/src' CXXLD nemiver main.o: In function `main': main.cc:(.text.startup+0x11ea): undefined

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 17:02:10 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 17:02:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

10.0-BETA2: LAPIC event timer and C2 c-state - abnormal high load

2013-10-29 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Hello! I partially upgraded my workstation from 9.2-RELEASE-p1 to 10.0-BETA2 using freebsd-update. Partially because I only performed the first pass (installing the kernel and rebooting). After the boot, the average load was around 5, with no activity on the computer. I tried again by

Re: 10.0-BETA2: LAPIC event timer and C2 c-state - abnormal high load

2013-10-29 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
I forgot the output of dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/lapic-high-load/dmesg-10.txt -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail

libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-29 Thread Sean Bruno
I *think* its safe to change this invocation of rl_message to omit the third argument, but I'm not 100%. Second, why on earth does a buildworld emit this warning 6 times? Its as though bmake things it needs to compile it repeatedly, and its not the only such time I've seen this across the tree.

Re: hwpstate0: set freq failed patch

2013-10-29 Thread hiren panchasara
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27, Claudio Zumbo wrote: Hello, Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html I've tested it on

Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-29 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:51:09PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: I *think* its safe to change this invocation of rl_message to omit the third argument, but I'm not 100%. Second, why on earth does a buildworld emit this warning 6 times? Its as though bmake things it needs to compile it

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 20:20:23 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 20:20:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Teske, Devin
Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as stable/10. Here's the reason why: http://devinteske.com/freebsd-installer-enhancements Summary: For

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 20:20:23 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 20:20:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Freddie Cash
On Oct 29, 2013 7:07 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Hasn't this been done already? There's mention of it in the archives from

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Teske, Devin
On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct 29, 2013 7:07 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Hasn't this been

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Freddie Cash
On Oct 29, 2013 7:21 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct 29, 2013 7:07 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Allan Jude
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-10-29 22:29, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct 29, 2013 7:21 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Oct 29, 2013 7:07 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Hi all,

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.comwrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as stable/10. Here's

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/30/13, 10:33 AM, Allan Jude wrote: There is a wiki page that provides a bit of information: https://wiki.freebsd.org/GCD But it seeps the last time the port was touched was over 2 years ago a lot of people over the years have indicated a liking of it in a general way but no-one has

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-29 23:41:28 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-29 23:41:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.comwrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as stable/10. Here's

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 10/29/13 21:04, Teske, Devin wrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as stable/10. Here's the reason why:

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/29/13, 3:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:54 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/29/13, 7:40 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/30/13, 10:33 AM, Allan Jude wrote: There is a wiki page that provides a bit of information: https://wiki.freebsd.org/GCD But it seeps the last time the port was touched was over 2

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-29 Thread Teske, Devin
On Oct 29, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 10/29/13 21:04, Teske, Devin wrote: Hi all, I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic.. Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base (contrib?). Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 03:22:30 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 03:22:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 02:13:24 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 02:13:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---