Re: Question about genassym, locore.s and 0-sized arrays (showstopper for an icc compiled kernel)

2003-09-04 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:47:09PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: We use the size of the symbol (ie the size of the object identified by the symbol) to pass around values. This we do by creating arrays. If we want to export a C constant 'FOOBAR' to assembly and the constant is defined to be

Re: Question about genassym, locore.s and 0-sized arrays(showstopper for an icc compiled kernel)

2003-09-05 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:34:39PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, I wrote: ... If some values are unrepresentable then they need to be represtended using other values. E.g., add 1 to avoid 0, or multiply by the alignment size if some element of the tool chanin instsists

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the patch below? It's against the cdrtools-devel port but should

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:36:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:47:44AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:21AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: Isn't it still a kernel bug if a user process can trigger a panic? Yes, it seems to be a bug in the mlockall(2) implementation. Backing it out or hindering

Re: X does not work on todays current with ATI

2003-10-05 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:56:53PM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote: Hello I am unable to start X with a current as of today 08.00 CEST, it crashes to the debugger with a fatal trap 12, I poked around to see if anything useful was in the logs but I could not find anything, can you please advice what

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:18:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not have done

Re: panic: vm_map_wire: lookup failed

2003-10-17 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 03:19:12PM +0200, John Hay wrote: The latest development source of ntpd started to use setrlimit() before using mlockall(). This combination proves fatal on -current. The code in ntpd/ntpd.c looks like this: Ok, I found an easier way to provoke the

Re: Random signals in {build,install}world recently?

2003-10-20 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:08:26PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:50:02AM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:20:56PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:27:38AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Vallo

Re: panic with cdrecord-devel @ Mon Oct 20 21:28:57 EEST 2003

2003-10-21 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:27:11AM +0300, Paulius Bulotas wrote: Hello, 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Oct 20 21:28:57 EEST 2003 % cdrecord -scanbus panics, and trace looks like: vmapbuf cam_periph_mapmem xptioctl spec_ioctl spec_vnoperate vn_ioctl ioctl syscall(2f,2f,2f,,3)

Re: CFT: PCI Command Register fixups

2013-08-10 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:56:48PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: All, Subversion rev 250418 affected approximately 63 drivers by making them vulnerable to resource allocation failures on motherboards with buggy BIOSes. The revision itself is good, but it needs to address these drivers and

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-16 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to

Re: newcons comming

2013-10-27 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:18:47PM +0300, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: Hello fellow hackers! I finally reach the point when I can work with newcons instead of syscons on my laptop. Yes, I know it still buggy and have a lot of style(9) problems. But we really have to get it into HEAD and 10.0 to

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:21:13PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote: I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to add suspend/resume as well as CPU speed change for certain PowerPC machines, about a year since I created the branch, and now it's stable enough that I want to

Re: panic on sparc64 running 10-beta4

2013-12-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:01:30AM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: I installed a sparc V120 (4GB memory, dual 72GB disks) with the 10-beta4 install image today. Installation went fine. I rebooted the machine, and then went to get a fresh ports tree, and the machine panic'd: root@host:/usr/ports

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-11 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:48:54PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote: On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:38:53 +0100 Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:21:13PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote: I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to add

Re: panic on sparc64 running 10-beta4

2013-12-27 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 02:50:23PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:01:30AM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: I installed a sparc V120 (4GB memory, dual 72GB disks) with the 10-beta4 install image today. Installation went fine. I rebooted the machine, and then went to get

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c o? sparc64/SMP

2011-06-28 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:19:33PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: Hello! I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64. Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages: 27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general: /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1614:

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-06-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:33:06PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/6/29 KOT MATPOCKuH matpoc...@gmail.com: I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64. Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages: 27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c o? sparc64/SMP

2011-07-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:55:09PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/28/2011 08:58, Marius Strobl wrote: Uhm, we once fixed a problem in the MD atomic implementation which still seems to present in the ISC copy. Could you please test whether the following patch makes a difference? http

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c o? sparc64/SMP

2011-07-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:55:15AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:55:09PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/28/2011 08:58, Marius Strobl wrote: Uhm, we once fixed a problem in the MD atomic implementation which still seems to present in the ISC copy. Could you please

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-07 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:46:23PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3, but problem is still exists: 07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.765 general: /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1622: REQUIRE(prev 0) failed

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-07 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/7/7 Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de: On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:46:23PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3, but problem is still exists: 07-Jul-2011 13

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:47:08PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/7/7 Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de: That's not the patch I was referring to. I did a second one which just entirely disables the use of atomic operations on sparc64: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:17:20PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/7/8 Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de: Please try the following: a) Instead of the base BIND use the dns/bind96 port. The native build ? of the latter defaults to not using the ISC atomic implementation

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-14 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH matpoc...@gmail.com: Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling. Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again. I started named from ports (dns/bind96) at Sat Jul ?9

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:31:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 07/14/2011 16:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: 2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH matpoc...@gmail.com: Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling. Please

Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP

2011-07-17 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:42:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 07/15/2011 01:40, Marius Strobl wrote: The generated config.h and platform.h for sparc64 are these: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_config.h http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_platform.h Marius, Thanks

Re: SSD - TRIM, SU and SUJ - Installer Options

2011-09-16 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 09/08/11 16:22, mysph...@web.de wrote: Hi there, first off all I have to say, that your new Installer in FBSD v9.0 is very well done. I just found an option, which is not activated at this time. So I wanted to ask, if

Re: SCSI descriptor sense changes, testing needed

2011-09-23 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:33:05PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: I have attached a set of patches against head that implement SCSI descriptor sense support for CAM. Descriptor sense is a new sense (SCSI error) format introduced in the SPC-3 spec in 2006. FreeBSD doesn't currently support

nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

2011-10-15 Thread Marius Strobl
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything? for 9/head: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff for 8:

Re: nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

2011-10-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote: Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following patch

Re: [CFC/CFT] large changes in the loader(8) code

2012-07-16 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 04:00:49PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 16.07.2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote: Yes. It should work as before. Well, but it's obvious that zfs_probe_dev would be attempting to do some unneeded stuff (trying to treat partitions as disks) for that case. To

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2012-12-25 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes that, allowing to get as many tick-based callout events as hz value permits, while still be able to aggregate events and

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 09:24:46PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 26.12.2012 01:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: Experiments with dummynet shown ineffective support for very short tick-based callouts. New version fixes

Re: Burning CDs and DVDs on SATA drive in FreeBSD 9.0

2011-12-09 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:23:58AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: Recompile the port; the CAM ioctl numbers have changed. Cheers Michiel When did these CAM ioctl numbers change? Was it before or after I built and installed cdrtools? Running ls -rtl /var/db/pkg/cdrtools-3.00_1

Re: Burning CDs and DVDs on SATA drive in FreeBSD 9.0

2011-12-10 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 02:27:22AM -0800, Thomas Mueller wrote: --- On Fri, 12/9/11, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote: +, Thomas Mueller wrote: Recompile the port; the CAM ioctl numbers have changed. Cheers Michiel When did these CAM ioctl numbers change

Re: sparc64 r228561 panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3

2011-12-16 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Updating from r216048 to r228561 on sparc64, with sys/conf/newvers.sh changed to REVISION=9.9. Trinscribed by hand: FreeBSD 9.9-CURRENT #3 r228561M: panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3 KDB: enter: panic [

Re: sparc64 r228561 panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3

2011-12-16 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:19:22AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:37:20AM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Updating from r216048 to r228561 on sparc64, with sys/conf/newvers.sh changed to REVISION

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-24 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:43:51PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - cleaning the object tree TB ---

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-13 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 06.01.2013 17:23, Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 09:24:46PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 26.12.2012 01:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-01-21 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 09:36:11PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 13.01.2013 20:09, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 06.01.2013 17:23, Marius Strobl wrote: I'm not really sure what to do about that. Earlier you already said

Re: Fast gettimeofday(2) and static linking

2013-01-28 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9 use the syscall for gettimeofday(2) and clock_gettime(2). Apparently, this is due to my use of the weak reference to the __vdso* symbols in the libc

Re: Fast gettimeofday(2) and static linking

2013-01-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:55:24PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9 use the syscall

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-02 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I

Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews

2013-02-11 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:47:09PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Hi, I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for the !x86

Re: [RFC] USB keyboard and devd.conf

2013-02-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Does anyone need these lines in /etc/devd.conf ? === etc/devd.conf == --- etc/devd.conf (revision 246620) +++ etc/devd.conf (local) @@ -105,16

Re: [RFC] USB keyboard and devd.conf

2013-02-13 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:23:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:51:01 Marius Strobl wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Does anyone need these lines in /etc/devd.conf ? === etc/devd.conf

Re: libcompiler_rt now part of FreeBSD's base system

2010-11-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 03:57:20PM +0100, Florian Smeets wrote: On 11.11.10 16:52, Ed Schouten wrote: I just committed libcompiler_rt.a to HEAD. Even though I don't expect serious issues -- especially not on the tier 1 architectures -- be sure to contact me in case something goes wrong. I

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-02-28 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:00:19PM +0100, Fabien Thomas wrote: Dears, After several research, i have removed the problematic part. You can find the new version here: http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-head20110222-openssl1.0.0d It will be great to have it in 9.0.

Re: Fwd: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-03-01 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: Dear, Have you extracted the tarball fo openssl source (1.0.0d) in crypto/openssl ? Ah, I missed that, the last couple of mails in this thread were only talking about the patch :) With the tarball untared it actually builds

Re: Fwd: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-03-02 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: Hello, This sound great :) SIGILL is raised when the program try to execute an assembly code that the CPU cannot execute. It mean that the library or the binary is miscompiled. Not necessarily, the sparc64 code f.e.

Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA

2011-04-20 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:57:47PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. With 9.0 release approaching quickly, I believe it the best time now to manage migration from legacy ata(4) ATA to the new CAM-based one. New ATA code present in the tree for more then a year now, used by many people and

Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA

2011-04-21 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:26:25PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:57:47PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: With 9.0 release approaching quickly, I believe it the best time now to manage migration from legacy ata(4) ATA to the new CAM-based one

Re: Old ATA disk names emulation [Was: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA]

2011-04-25 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:23:37PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've implemented following patch to keep basic compatibility for the migrating users. I don't like such hacky things, but at least I tried to make it less invasive. The idea: - New xpt_path_legacy_ata_id() function in

Re: ZFS panic with concurrent recv and read-heavy workload

2011-06-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:03:56AM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: I just got this on another machine, no heavy workload needed, just booting and starting some jails. Of interest, perhaps, both this and the machine triggering the below panic are SMP V240s with 1.5GHz CPUs (though I will

Re: TLS bug?

2011-06-17 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:53:19AM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: Atcht; it's late. I forgot to mention that this system is a sparc64 V240 2-way SMP machine. It's running a kernel from 9.0-CURRENT r222833+262af52: Tue Jun 7 18:47:35 EDT 2011 and a userland from a little later. Sorry

Re: TLS bug?

2011-06-17 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:31:29PM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:07:13PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: Using bonnie++ I can't reproduce this (didn't try mysql) but I have I seem to have good luck reproducing it with -r 5 -s 10 -x 10 by about the third iteration

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:28:28AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) C. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to compile a virus-scanner for Linux that allows for scanning Windoze PCs in a network for all sorts of recent viruses (RPC/DCOM and

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:51:12AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:44:59 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This happens with g++ 3.x ... This will happen with g++ 3.x, 2.x, 1.x and future 4.x too. I.e. the GCC is not at fault and the subject of the original

Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-10 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:22:45PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: JBI figured out what is happenning I think. You are getting a spurious JBinterrupt from the 8259A PIC (which comes in on IRQ 7). The IRR register JBlists pending interrupts still waiting to

Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-10 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:12:56PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 10-Nov-2003 John Hay wrote: With the new interrupt code I get: ... OK boot cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 instruction pointer = 0x0:0xa00 stack pointer = 0x0:0xffe frame pointer = 0x0:0x0 code

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

2010-04-24 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:31:37PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. With time passed, CAM-based ATA infrastructure IMHO looks enough mature now to enable it in HEAD. Now we have two new stable drivers ahci(4) and siis(4), covering major part of modern SATA HBAs, `options ATA_CAM` wrapper

Re: mpt(4) MPI_EVENT_IR_RESYNC_UPDATE

2010-05-01 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 06:50:26PM +0400, pluknet wrote: On 30 April 2010 18:22, Matthew Jacob m...@feral.com wrote: pluknet wrote: Seems good to me- why not trhow it freebsd-scsi? if nobody says no, I'll put it in Err.. I thought that list is dedicated for cam related stuff. [cc'ing

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

2010-05-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:18:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: Marius Strobl wrote: As noted earlier, pc98 and sparc64 need ada(4)/CAM ATA to perform geometry translation as done by ad_firmware_geom_adjust() for ad(4), which the following

Re: AESNI driver and fpu_kern KPI

2010-05-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:04:01PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: I am interested in the problem reports and reviews. Maintainers of !x86-oids are welcome to provide feedback whether they feel that proposed KPI could be implemented on their architectures, or what modifications they consider

Re: Followup: if_em.c prevents the 2nd time resuming

2010-05-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:23:17PM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote: PR filed as kern/146614. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146614 That was an mismerge introduced when moving the original patch forward to a newer version of the e1000 source. It's now fixed. Thanks for reporting.

Re: [sparc64] [panic] cheetah_ipi_selected: CPU can't IPI itself

2010-06-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:25:15AM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: Well, I'm back in the same town as my sparc64 and so csup'd, built, and rebooted, trying to get more information about the vm object not owned panic I reported a while ago. To my dismay, I now get this panic, also late

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next-prev != elm

2010-07-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: Upgraded to from stable to current yesterday and very quickly received a panic. It did however not dump it's core, so I was unable to debug it. Today it did panic again, and I took a picture: (Sorry about the bad quality)

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next-prev != elm

2010-07-18 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:31:26PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: On 2010-07-15 at 19:52, St?le Kristoffersen wrote: On 2010-07-15 at 18:00, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: Upgraded to from stable to current yesterday and very

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next-prev != elm

2010-07-20 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:06:54PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: On 2010-07-18 at 14:20, Marius Strobl wrote: Downgrading now... And it crashed again, with current from r209598... Ok, this at least means that your problem isn't caused by the recent changes to mpt(4

Re: {arch}/conf/DEFAULTS and uart

2010-09-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:40:49AM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, except for arm

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next-prev != elm

2010-09-24 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:55:28PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: On 2010-07-20 at 12:17, Marius Strobl wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:06:54PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: On 2010-07-18 at 14:20, Marius Strobl wrote: Downgrading now... And it crashed again

Re: bge0 does not work anymore

2010-10-18 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:32:13AM +0800, Buganini wrote: my last known usable kernel revision is r213813 with r213920, leds are extinguished when executing dhclient Sorry, it looks like it was my fault this time, should be fixed again with r214012. Marius

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-05 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself. Several small patches allow us to pass most of that tests:

Re: r276200: EFI boot failure: kernel stops booting at pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0

2014-12-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 29/12/14 a les 12.41, Roger Pau Monné ha escrit: Hello, Sorry for not noticing this earlier, I've been without a computer for some days. Do you get a panic message, or the system just freezes? Can you please post

Re: r276200: EFI boot failure: kernel stops booting at pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0

2014-12-29 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 29/12/14 a les 12.41, Roger Pau Monné ha escrit: Hello, Sorry for not noticing this earlier, I've been without a computer for some days. Do you get

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8

2015-02-18 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:45:36AM +0100, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: Hi! An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for wider testing! The patch against HEAD is here: https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch Have you looked into

Re: Wake on LAN broken (probably between r290542 - r290606)?

2015-11-15 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:56:36AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:33:37AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > But a quick perusal of > > doesn't show > > anything especially like a "smoking gun" -- to me,

Re: HEADS UP: sparc64 backend for llvm/clang imported

2015-08-26 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:19:03PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: Dimitry Andric wrote this message on Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 20:22 +0100: In r262613 I have merged the clang-sparc64 branch back to head. This imports an updated sparc64 backend for llvm and clang, allowing clang to bootstrap itself

Re: sparc64 traps during probe (r293243)

2016-01-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:42:33AM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: > I recently updated a sparc64 V120 from r291993 > to r293243, and it now traps during the > autoconfiguration phase of the kernel boot: > <...> > -- data access exception sfar=0xfcf821ca0218 sfsr=0x41029 > %o7=0xc06165e8 -- What

Re: sparc64 traps during probe (r293243)

2016-01-08 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:57:58PM +, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 08/01/16 15:42, Kurt Lidl wrote: > > This looks amazingly similar to what I get trying to boot FreeBSD under > QEMU, i.e. pointing at sched_clock(): > <...> > -- kernel stack fault %o7=0xc011a050 -- > panic: longjmp botch >

Re: Realtek 8168/8111 if_re not working in current r295091

2016-02-05 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:57:01PM +0100, s@web.de wrote: > After updating -current at Jan, 31st (r295091) the Realtek ethernet device > driver of my Zotac ZBox RI323 mini pc seems to be broken: I can neither > connect to the host even though the interface is shown as active, nor can I >

Re: Re: Realtek 8168/8111 if_re not working in current r295091

2016-02-05 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:04:02PM +0100, s@web.de wrote: > Hi Marius and Pyun, > > actually it is Chip rev. 0x2c80 (I have overlooked that information in my > first post) > > re0: port > 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xf0104000-0xf0104fff,0xf010-0xf0103fff irq 19 at > device 0.0 on pci2 >

Re: Re: Re: Realtek 8168/8111 if_re not working in current r295091

2016-02-13 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 09:21:06PM +0100, Stefan Kohl wrote: > Hi Marius, > > I finally got my RT 8168 Ethernet Card (Zotac Ri323) working after > patching if_re.c (r295601). Contrary to the assumption that > HWREV_8168E_VL with Chip Rev 0x2c80 should not require RTL8168G > handling as soon

Re: [tzsetup] can't set up local timezone if CMOS is set to UTC

2017-08-07 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:51:15AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 07.08.2017 09:44, Boris Samorodov ?: > > Hi Marius, All, > > > > Subj at today's amd64-HEAD. If I use command "sudo tzsetup" and > > choose YES (CMOS clock is set to UTC), the program just quits. > > Yea, my clocks are at UTC

Re: SD card reader only works after a suspend/resume

2018-09-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > Hi, > > > I discovered this by chance. > > The SD card reader in my laptop has never worked, but now I noticed it > does after suspending and resuming. > > The controller is probed and attached on boot: > > sdhci_acpi1:

Re: SG116j install crashed

2018-01-22 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:25:08PM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > At Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:35:41 +0900, > my wrote: > > > > Hi, all > > > > I've bought Biccamera's original bland note PC (SG116j) > > impulsively because of cheapness($1780). I've installed > > 12.0-CURRENT(r327788) right away.

Re: SD card reader only works after a suspend/resume

2018-09-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > On 9/7/18 12:41 AM, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> I discovered this by chance. > >> > >