Re: df problems ?

2002-10-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Dave Evans wrote: This is all very true for 4.7, but what about earlier versions. I compiled fsck using 4.7 srcs, includes and hierarchy with 4.0 libraries and tools, so that I could have an fsck I could use with my 4.0 CDROM (the latest one I have, unfortunately)

HEADSUP: burncd/cdcontrol need to be rebuilt (CDRIO*SPEED changes)

2002-10-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With current from yesterday, I get the following error when trying to burn a cd. I haven't burned one for probably a month or maybe more. If I remove the -s, the results are the same. Does anyone have a suggestion, fix or work around? #

Re: HEADSUP: burncd/cdcontrol need to be rebuilt (CDRIO*SPEED changes)

2002-10-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With current from yesterday, I get the following error when trying to burn a cd. I haven't burned one for probably a month or maybe more. If I remove the -s, the results are the same. Does anyone have

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: what would it take to allow burncd to work on SCSI devices.? You got it backwards -- is atapicam complete enough to work reliably with cdrecord? There's no reason for us to replicate a more feature-complete port in our src tree. -Nate To

Re: status of npx patch |= PCB_NPXINITDONE?

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Flickinger wrote: I placed your patch for npx in my kernel builds for 25 and 26 Oct ... I have not had xemacs under X lock-up since --and it was downright regular prior. Is this the reason? Will the patch be committed? Time stamps are GMT.

Re: HEADSUP: burncd/cdcontrol need to be rebuilt (CDRIO*SPEED changes)

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Quoting Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | SNAP | | | | | I checked again and my commit had missed the burncd speed conversion. I | | just committed it -- rev 1.28 burncd.c. Sorry

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
2002, Nate Lawson wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: what would it take to allow burncd to work on SCSI devices.? You got it backwards -- is atapicam complete enough to work reliably with cdrecord? There's no reason for us to replicate a more feature-complete port

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote: Well, burncd is about to grow even more DVD support thanks to donations of HW etc from our users. As usual it will be totally open and free (as in beer)... That's always good to hear. PS: I find it somewhat amusing that the loudest speakers for

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-28 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: You're probably right. But without waiting to re-architect libgtop, I think the immediate problem needs to be fixed. Shall I just commit my original patch that uses libkvm? Use v_cachedid and v_cachedfs

DIOCGDINFO, DIOCGSLICEINFO fail

2002-10-28 Thread Nate Lawson
World and kernel from today. newfs_msdos, disklabel both fail on these ioctls. -- moe# uname -a FreeBSD moe 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Oct 28 15:23:20 PST 2002 nate@moe:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOEPRO i386 moe# ls -l /sbin/disklabel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root

Re: libfetch(3) patch for SSL

2002-10-29 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd rather fix it like this: Oomph, of course this doesn't work in the !ssl case. I would really prefer a solution that allowed wlen == 0 if we actually *intended* not to write anything, but I

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-30 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote: Hmm, it is true that I could use ATAPI command directly in burncd, and I actually have a version in the lab that is ~75% converted to that, I'd love to see that once you're ready to release. but that is not the only issue here. The ATAPI cd driver

libc size

2002-10-30 Thread Nate Lawson
After a discussion on cvs-all regarding size of our libc, I wrote a quick script to see where the problems are. A cursory glance at its output shows there are numerous things we can improve, including: * setproctitle(3) uses 4k of static scratch buffers when it could allocate these on the

Re: disklabel with fresh drive

2002-10-30 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Jun Kuriyama wrote: I'm trying to install fresh 5.0-current from self-baked ISO. But when I select fresh drive at Configure - Label in sysinstall, sysinstall stalls (title, table, synopsis is printed, but no Part rows). I can do Alt-F2 even if main screen cannot accept

Re: kern/42417 cannot probe Olympus digital camera, C-1

2002-10-31 Thread Nate Lawson
I looked at the change and it seems good. Can someone more familiar with the USB system verify this? Thanks, Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: fdisk -BI ob clean disk broken

2002-11-04 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Hay wri tes: Hmmm. I just noticed that the disks probe with zero values for the heads, sectors/track and cylinders. I have tried two different USB CF readers and both do it. On 4.x it probes with the correct

Re: umass CF geometry problems, was Re: fdisk -BI ob clean diskbroken

2002-11-04 Thread Nate Lawson
See XPT_CALC_GEOMETRY in /sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Nick Hibma wrote: Let's work on the 'proper' solution first. What SCSI commands are suitable for getting the geometry, generically on a device? Nick fdisk likely should do something sane in the face of such

Re: umass CF geometry problems, was Re: fdisk -BI ob clean diskbroken

2002-11-04 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, John Hay wrote: Let's work on the 'proper' solution first. What SCSI commands are suitable for getting the geometry, generically on a device? Hmmm, I made an interesting discovery. I searched through some of the scsi drivers, sys/dev/{aha|ahb|aic*|sym}, looking for

Re: umass CF geometry problems, was Re: fdisk -BI ob clean diskbroken

2002-11-04 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writ es: It might be more useful for GEOM to query the BIOS for the physical values and provide a way for upper levels (like CAM) to retrieve this. This is a driver task. besides GEOM is above CAM

Re: Why is my -current system Hard Locking?

2002-11-04 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Joel M. Baldwin wrote: I'm getting quite frustrated with -current. I've been running it for years and had relatively few problems. However for quite some time now I've had a problem with Hard Locks. By Hard Lock I mean that the system doesn't respond to ether traffic,

GDB auto enter/detach patch

2002-11-05 Thread Nate Lawson
I've put together a patch that enables a kernel on the target machine to detect a GDB packet and automatically enter GDB mode. When the debugger detaches, it also continues execution. This speeds up debugging, especially when the target is in a remote location. The patch plus more explanation

Re: GDB auto enter/detach patch

2002-11-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Nate Lawson writes: I've put together a patch that enables a kernel on the target machine to detect a GDB packet and automatically enter GDB mode. When the debugger detaches, it also continues execution. This speeds up debugging, especially when

i810 hang: more info

2002-11-06 Thread Nate Lawson
I have found additional information that may be useful regarding the hard hang I have been experiencing. Details were present in a previous message but here is a short summary. I have two of the exact same boxes (even same HD). They are i810 mobos with a Celeron 500 and 128MB ram and a 10GB IDE

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David Rhodu wrote: Sidcarter wrote: Hi Folks, I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes immediately after loading the modules. The error message is here

Re: adaptec scsi - seagate da -- current

2002-11-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Andre Albsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It seems to be a Quantum Atlas drive. IIRC, I have several of them running fine (I am not 100% sure, I am on holidays at the moment :-)). You might want to check the firmware of that drive. I have

sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-12 Thread Nate Lawson
I've found an interesting contradiction and was wondering what behavior sleep should have. It checks for a command line flag with getopt(3) and exits with usage() if it finds one. However, it then checks for a '-' or '+' sign. If negative, it behaves like sleep 0 and exits immediately. This

Re: sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-12 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-12 ] [ Subjecte: sleep(1) behavior ] I've found an interesting contradiction and was wondering what behavior sleep should have. It checks for a command line flag with getopt(3) and exits

Re: sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:07:22 -0800 (PST), Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thanks, that's what I was expecting. The attached patch provides the following behavior: sleep 0 = exit 0 immediately sleep [ \t]*1 = sleep 1 second sleep

Re: panic when removing umass device (USB Camera)

2002-11-14 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Kutulu wrote: I have an HP digital camera w/ CompactFlash that acts as a USB mass-storage device that's panic'ing my system when I remove it. If I do not load the umass driver, then the camera is detected as a simple generic ugen0 device, and I can safely add/remove the

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === vinum Makefile, line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target geom_bsd.o ignored cc1: warnings being treated as errors /h/des/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c: In function `ahd_ddb_in':

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-15 ] [ Subjecte: Re: alpha tinderbox failure ] On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === vinum Makefile, line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target

Re: kernel panic when booting with USB CF reader

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Eggert wrote: I'm seeing a kernel panic on -current (9/26) when booting with a SanDisk ImageMate II USB comact flash reader plugged in. The panic occurs after the kernel has loaded when the first rc.d scripts execute (dumpon, vinum, etc). If I boot with the

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote: He means 'nowerror' in sys/conf/files Since this doesn't generate errors on i386, would it be counterproductive to put it in the global files? FWIW, the correct patch would be to use %j and uintmax_t, not longs. I believe this was not done due to Linux

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACPI errors and then panic Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get suspend, resume, etc. I have

Re: Sign fixes for disklabel(8)

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning scheme. It also allows you to correctly make

Re: SMP stability ? [was Re: more info from panic from running

2002-11-19 Thread Nate Lawson
I have a couple BP6's running -stable and was having hard lock problems under heavy IO until I dropped back to ATA33 on the drives (I moved them to the onboard Intel controller instead of the HPT366). sos@ informed me that the HPT366 has a buggy DMA controller and that ATA66 on them wouldn't

Re: DP2 (I think!) crash booting from floppies

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: local.freebsd.current wrote: I got a pair of floppies from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20021103-SNAP/floppies/ and booted them on a Dell Dimension XPS D300 which is currently running 4.7. It's a PII/300 with an

cron fork bomb, processes deadlocked

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
I am running with WITNESS and WITNESS_SKIPSPIN. Today I couldn't log into my current box because it was out of processes. I went to ddb and found a bunch of pairs of cron processes. One would be blocked in fork and the second in execve. The relevant stack trace for the execve ones is:

Re: DP2 (I think!) crash booting from floppies

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Nate Lawson wrote: Can someone get the memory detection (int 12) back to stable? The conservative approach seems to only have the limitation of losing 640k whereas the experimental approach causes panics. Can we take such critical

Re: more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debugtraceback

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person before. Tried memtest86.com yet? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

cron fork bomb/hang -- more info

2002-11-21 Thread Nate Lawson
Just to recap, the system is running but cannot fork anymore procs. This means I can't login. Cron does a make -j3 buildworld each night and it appears this is triggering it. Sys is uniprocessor. Please let me know if you need more info. db ps pid proc addruid ppid pgrp flag

Re: recommended VAIO for ACPI hacking (Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.0Rtodo.sgml)

2002-11-21 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Ollivier Robert wrote: According to Mitsuru IWASAKI: Thanks. Here is the result. The first check is there and there are several others in acpidump output. Full dump at http://www.keltia.net/download/acpidump-z600tek -=-=-=- Method(_PTS, 1) {

Re: Searching for users of netncp and nwfs to help debug 5.0 problems

2002-11-22 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote: At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote: A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a decent bug report. It doesn't help when the process involves another

Re: Searching for users of netncp and nwfs to help debug 5.0 problems

2002-11-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote: At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote: A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Philip Paeps wrote: On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote the words in effect of: | unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0501 can't assign

More info on blocked procs with make -j3 buildworld

2002-11-25 Thread Nate Lawson
More info. Someone should bite one of these times. So far I've got no takers so if interested, please help. I've got a box that was operational but no more procs (can't log in). It looks like the nightly 'make -j3 buildworld' hung it. I left it in ddb with hopes someone will ask the right

Re: [acpi-jp 1940] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACPI errors and then panic Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI

panic from acpiconf -s 4

2002-11-26 Thread Nate Lawson
While trying to suspend my IBM T23, I ran into a panic. acpiconf -s for values 1,2,3 does nothing (failing with acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND). But acpiconf -s 4 panics. scsuspend(c3352600,c32cf058,c03f4d6c,c3335d80,0) at scsuspend+0x17

Re: Searching for users of netncp and nwfs to help debug 5.0 problems

2002-11-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of: In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46: /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has incomplete type

Re: Searching for users of netncp and nwfs to help debug 5.0 problems

2002-11-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of: In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46: /home/src

Re: Trivial patch: fdisk doesn't recognize my partitions

2002-12-01 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini write s: I have 4 primary partitions and I use a boot manager (magic.com) that install some black magic that hide unused partition, this permit to have multiple 'other-OS' partition that don't know of

Re: Any ideas at all about network problem?

2002-12-02 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Craig Reyenga wrote: I just tried a 3com 3c905 NIC (my roommate's) and it _also_ transfers slowly (about 3.5MB/sec, so just under half of what i used to get with my realtek in -stable). It also spit out a few messages: [ ... ] I'd really

Re: dump(8) + UFS2

2002-12-02 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Manfred Antar wrote: At 10:56 AM 11/30/2002 -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Well, I once restored something to UFS2 (converting my partitions...). It was quite funny to see 102.7% was complete, and it would end in 0 (minutes, one assume). Here are further messages from

Re: ACPI Poweroff problem

2002-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Lukas Kaminski wrote: I recently (friday, november 30.) installed FreeBSD Current, and it seems pretty usable. (Congratulations) :-) But (there is everytime a but) i have some trouble with ACPI. While suspend to RAM works flawlessly, the machine doesn't power off. If the

Re: ATA/ATAPI related panic

2002-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Bruce Cran wrote: I've had a problem with my DVD and CDRW drives under FreeBSD from 4.5 onwards. In released prior to 4.7 I used to get panics, I think when the system had heavy I/O loads, such as when building world - I thought this may have been due to the VIA

Re: can't checkout src for CURRENT

2002-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
On 4 Dec 2002, Andrew Thompson wrote: On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 22:18, Denis N. Peplin wrote: On Tuesday 03 December 2002 02:00, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:59:20PM +0300, Denis N. Peplin wrote: What wrong and how to solve this problem? Looks like you may have

Re: ACPI Poweroff problem

2002-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Thomas Seck wrote: * Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Power System off using ACPI ACPI -1287 *** Error: Method execution failed AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL ACPI -1287 *** Error: Method execution failed AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL ACPIEnterSleepStatePrep

Re: ACPI + Compaq Armada m700

2002-12-04 Thread Nate Lawson
On 4 Dec 2002, Craig Boston wrote: I've been conversing with Paul off-list about this and it is working on his m700 now with a fixed AML file. I'm posing my modified AML since there appear to be a few more people using current on the m700 now than the last time I checked (when it was 0 :).

Re: DP2 won't stay powered off

2002-12-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Mathew Kanner wrote: I've noticed some odd behavior when I installed DP2 on my machine last night. When I shutdown -p now, the machine will turn itself back-on in about twenty minutes. This would be nice feature if I had asked for it. Can everyone with the auto

Re: Problems building GENERIC with DP2 on ThinkPad 600E

2002-12-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: When boot the new kernel it seems to be OK for a few seconds, but any attempt to login produces a crash: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x3f6 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction

Re: ATA/ATAPI related panic

2002-12-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Bruce Cran wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:40:03AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Bruce Cran wrote: I've had a problem with my DVD and CDRW drives under FreeBSD from 4.5 onwards. In released prior to 4.7 I used to get panics, I think when the system

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or does it come back to life? If the system does not

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Marc Recht wrote: mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. ign -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED I'd bet that -march=pentium4 is your problem.

Re: FW: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I've discussed this issue with Poul-Henning Kamp. You need fsck from at least 4.7. Is this handled by fsck/setup.c,v 1.17.2.4 commit? Yes, this looks like the correct commit. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: To copy the 'ps' debugger output, I'd have to manually copy it all, so here are just a few highlights: Proc State - fsck_ufs 0004000 norm[SLPQ nbufbs c036e5b0][SLP] fsck 0004002 norm[SLPQ wait c124dce8][SLP]

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-07 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: I put a copy of / in /usr then from the fixit, I mounted /usr as / and ran growfs from there.. the trick is to not do it while / is mounted. / wasn't mounted yet when I ran growfs: I ran growfs after booting single user

Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-09 Thread Nate Lawson
I rebuilt my kernel with today's current + the acpica-20021122 patch and rebooted. I use ufs1, no acls or special options other than SU (installed with DP1). Everything booted fine with some errors from acpi but as booting proceeded, I started getting kernel messages of bad inode. I quickly

Re: [acpi-jp 1855] Re: no floppy drive with acpi.ko loaded

2002-12-10 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David O'Brien wrote: If this mobo will always require a custom .AML file I want to commit the one I have and start a table of mobo/BIOS's and the custom .AML files we offer. Thank you, we really need this! -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: panic in ithread_loop()

2002-12-10 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xc01e8d fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc045dc80 stack pointer = 0x10:0xd536dce4 frame pointer

Re: More info on blocked procs with make -j3 buildworld

2002-12-10 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Alan L. Cox wrote: Does your kernel include the following? Revision 1.200 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Nov 17 09:33:00 2002 UTC (8 days, 21 hours ago) by jeff Branch: MAIN Changes since 1.199: +4 -4 lines Diff to previous 1.199 (colored) -

Re: Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:04:03 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I started getting kernel messages of bad inode. I quickly rebooted to single user and ran fsck and got a huge set of errors. See

Re: Current hangs in reboot

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote: On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote: Current as of yesterday (actually problem presist about month) hangs on reboot. Only message: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped Turning off ACPI makes it reboot.

Re: ioctl(CAMGETPASSTHRU) hung X11/cda process

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: # ps xauww | egrep cda root 36761 0.0 0.3 1884 1452 p4 D 7:25PM 0:00.01 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xmcd/bin-FreeBSD_5-i386/cda -batch -dev /dev/cd0 on # strace -p 36761 ioctl(0, CAMGETPASSTHRU (...hangs forever and won't die with kill

net/if.h and IFNAMSIZ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
A few headers use IFNAMSIZ but do not include net/if.h. This breaks some users that also don't include it. Should we fix this by adding the include? Any problems with this? Reference IFNAMSIZ net/if_ieee80211.h net/if_mib.h net/if_ppp.h net/if_vlan_var.h netatalk/at_var.h netatm/atm.h

__BSD_VISIBLE and u_int

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
What's the proper way to get a typedef for u_int? Is there a doc somewhere on what we expect in terms of #defines for 3rd party application authors? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: sysinstall and serial consoles

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bill Fenner wrote: I installed 5.0-RC1 on a Sun Ultra-60 a couple of days ago. The biggest problem that I ran into was terminal emulation inside sysinstall. I normally do most tasks inside screen, so I tried selecting the vt100 emulation (since that's what screen tries

Re: sysinstall and serial consoles

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bill Fenner wrote: screen(1) says Each virtual terminal provides the functions of a DEC VT100 terminal and, in addition, several control functions from the ISO 6492 ... and ISO 2022 standards I meant sysinstall generating cons25 output. But there were recently a lot

Re: if_fxp and pause packets (or, I didn't need the network anyway)

2002-12-11 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Robert Watson wrote: I'm having a recurring problem on a number of machines wherein the fxp interfaces on those machines will spew out pause packets in vast quantities while the system is in ddb, or following a shutdown. I've noticed this too with fxp. It only happens

Re: ioctl(CAMGETPASSTHRU) hung X11/cda process

2002-12-12 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:37:42 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: # ps xauww | egrep cda root 36761 0.0 0.3 1884 1452 p4 D 7:25PM 0:00.01

Re: Losing the battle with RC1

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E). The installation worked pretty well, but the system crashes frequently when acpi is running. I decided to get a dump to look at and added the following

Re: ioctl(CAMGETPASSTHRU) hung X11/cda process

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: (kgdb) frame 2 #2 0xc0140ffc in cam_periph_getccb (periph=0xc41fc080, priority=1) at /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c:748 748 /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c: No such file or directory. in /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c (kgdb) print

Re: Losing the battle with RC1

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:10 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ad0s2 needs to be as big as main memory or dumps may overwrite the next partition. Actually, a bit bigger. But that doesn't matter as I made it 160 MB back when

Re: Losing the battle with RC1

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said: It's always been there. the question is Who has broken it? I think it has just slowly bitrotted. I opened a PR on this in November. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/45777 This

Re: Major disk problem

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Craig Reyenga wrote: I cvsup'ed today (dec 12, about 5pm est) from DP2, and it went all fine and dandy until I went to boot into it, when it said that /usr had a bad superblock. I then went on to fsck -y it, and it says that _every_ file is an unknown type and goes on to

Re: __BSD_VISIBLE and u_int

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's the proper way to get a typedef for u_int? Is there a doc somewhere on what we expect in terms of #defines for 3rd party application authors? sys/types.h will give you a typedef, provided you aren't

Re: 5.0 showstopper

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: looking at the code in src/sys/i386/i386/dump_machdep.c, we see: 78 dumplo = di-mediaoffset + di-mediasize - Maxmem * (off_t)PAGE_SIZE; 79 dumplo -=

Re: __BSD_VISIBLE and u_int

2002-12-13 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: I fixed a port like this recently. _ANSI_SOURCE was actually added by the port, not the application vendor, in that case. Wait a minute, I think this might be the same port. Is it gnu-finger? If so, try the attached patch. Kris was going to

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Erik Trulsson wrote: The only remotely good reason I have heard for removing support for 386 in the default configuration is that having it in would pessimize performance too much for more modern CPUs. How valid that reason is I cannot judge, but I guess it is possible.

Re: ipfw userland breaks again.

2002-12-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: Here's a new patch. But there isn't much of a point if we do not also disallow ipfw DELETE and FLUSH. And the pipe config commands as well as anything else that changes the firewall state. Firewalls are there to protect the systems

Re: SCSI Bios complaints and Disk Slices

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote: Windows .. fine, I installed Linux .. fine. Then I installed FreeBSD...fine *but* the SCSI BIOS on bootup complains that the disk geometry is all cockeyed, and it looks that way from what it says. It warns any non-DOS O/S may have problems using it.

Re: Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: It appears that you are getting all those errors (BAD block) because fsck thinks that your filesystem is smaller than it really is. If you do a dumpfs on the filesystem and check the size (about line 5), I expect that you will find that all those bad

tunefs bug?

2002-12-17 Thread Nate Lawson
tunefs(8) appears to do a mount/MNT_RELOAD of an fs even when it doesn't perform any action. To reproduce: mount -r /usr tunefs -n enable /usr [repeat] Is this a bug? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Data corruption in soft updates?

2002-12-18 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Please send me a `dumpfs /usr | head -50' output of the filesystem under the current system. Then clean it up with fsck and run the same command again. Finally, boot up under the old kernel and get the output both before and after fsck cleaning. What I

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working).

2002-12-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: The panic described in 46176 has happened to me on -current. On -stable I have managed (very easily) to get the CAM layer vs UMASS layer into a confused state where the CAM

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: Yes, this is a USB DiskKey - UMASS storage, SCSI over bulk only device. I've done some further testing on both -current and -stable. I cannot get the device to work unless I have the quirk entry in scsi_da.c. -Current has a quirk

Re: Panic: memory modified after free

2002-12-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Running 5.0-RC as of yesterday on i386. background fsck was in progress, but other than that system was idle. Logged in as root on the console, had cd'd to a ports directory. (note that it panics almost instantly when using the console, but lasts

Re: `cat /dev/io` leads to system lockup.

2002-12-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote: On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its knees by doing # cat /dev/io While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be doing, is it really something that should bring the system down?

Re: missed disk nodes

2002-12-30 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please: dd if=/dev/da2 bs=64k | uuencode - foo | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ You probably should add count=1 there, otherwise it's going to be a big email. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: witness: could sleep with dc0 locked

2002-12-31 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote: Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has a reason to complain, right? :).) Many

Re: witness: could sleep with dc0 locked

2002-12-31 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, ryan beasley wrote: Not sure if this is already known, and I'm not knowledgeable enough to tell if this is a harmless warning or an indicator of trouble down the road. (I'm assuming the prior as witness normally has

  1   2   3   4   5   >