Re: is dumpon/savecore broken?

1999-07-20 Thread Steven G. Kargl
According to Poul-Henning Kamp: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Steven G. Kar gl" writes: During the boot process I see dumpon: crash dumps to /dev/da0s1b (4, 131073) checking for core dump...savecore: can't find device 13/131073 It seems that the the major device number is reset

Re: is dumpon/savecore broken?

1999-07-20 Thread Steven G. Kargl
According to Matthew Dillon: :dumpon: crash dumps to /dev/da0s1b (4, 131073) :checking for core dump...savecore: can't find device 13/131073 : : It seems that the the major device number is reset from 4 to 13. : : Yes, all dev_t's which make it out of the kernel have cmajor :

[PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? Change the words to whatever suits your fancy. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ --- UPDATING.orig Wed Nov 6 16:20:05 2002 +++ UPDATINGWed Nov 6 16:27:08 2002 @@ -17,6 +17,15 @@ developers choose to

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
M. Warner Losh said: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? : Change the words to whatever suits your fancy. I'm trying to devise a good way to deal with this breakage and hope it is transient

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
M. Warner Losh said: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh said: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? : : Change

PAM, X11, and su as a normal user? (fwd)

2003-09-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I sent this inquire to freebsd-question, but came up empty with respect to solutions to the problem. I have 2 accounts on my freebsd-current machine. I use startx to start X11 as user kargl. If I then su to user sgk, I cannot fire up X clients. For example, troutmask:kargl[202] su sgk

Re: PAM, X11, and su as a normal user? (fwd)

2003-09-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Pat Lashley wrote: --On Friday, September 05, 2003 23:13:29 -0700 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 accounts on my freebsd-current machine. I use startx to start X11 as user kargl. If I then su to user sgk, I cannot fire up X clients. For example, Try 'ssh -X

Re: PAM, X11, and su as a normal user? (fwd)

2003-09-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 02:13, Steven G. Kargl wrote: I have 2 accounts on my freebsd-current machine. I use startx to start X11 as user kargl. If I then su to user sgk, I cannot fire up X clients. For example, Is $XAUTHORITY still set in the subshell

Re: PAM, X11, and su as a normal user? (fwd)

2003-09-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Pat Lashley wrote: --On Saturday, September 06, 2003 00:31:17 -0700 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't quite understand your suggestion. I login as user kargl. I fire up X11 as user kargl with startx. I use su in a xterm to connect to my alter ego (su sgk). Now

Re: PAM, X11, and su as a normal user? (fwd)

2003-09-06 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 03:41, Steven G. Kargl wrote: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 02:13, Steven G. Kargl wrote: I have 2 accounts on my freebsd-current machine. I use startx to start X11 as user kargl. If I then su to user

[PATCH] workaround for kern/56869

2003-09-16 Thread Steven G. Kargl
--- /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile.orig Tue Sep 16 10:42:38 2003 +++ /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile Tue Sep 16 10:42:54 2003 @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ twe \ tx \ txp \ - uart \ ubsa \ ubsec \ ucom \ -- Steve

linux-mozilla not exiting properly (KSE signal fallout?)

2003-06-28 Thread Steven G. Kargl
David, Julian, I updated my system today after David's KSE signal changes. I'm sure if this is the cause of my problem, but linux-mozilla no longer exits. % linux-mozilla ... browse ... crtl-q % ps | grep mozilla 6032 v0 SL 0:00.02 /bin/sh ./run-mozilla.sh ./mozilla-bin 6037 v0 SL

kernel panic in ufs_getattr

2001-11-03 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I have the core file, kernel, and kernel.debug if some one needs access let me know. Source is from 9 am PST. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ Script started on Sat Nov 3 12:25:23 2001 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software,

endless loop with gettimeofday in mozilla

2001-12-14 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I suspect that this a mozilla problem, but I only recently have run into this. Rebuilt world and kernel from -current sources from Dec 13 16:15 PDT. If I open the mail/news component of mozilla, and try to change the view to only unread messages X11 freezes. Switching to a vty and running

more endian.h breakage; patch included.

2000-10-15 Thread Steven G. Kargl
There is another patch needed in libdialog. Steve *** /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_wait4.c.origSun Oct 15 11:16:02 2000 --- /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_wait4.c Sun Oct 15 11:16:45 2000 *** *** 32,37 --- 32,38 * $FreeBSD:

another endian.h causality; patch included

2000-10-15 Thread Steven G. Kargl
*** /usr/src/gnu/lib/libdialog/prgbox.c.origSun Oct 15 12:44:15 2000 --- /usr/src/gnu/lib/libdialog/prgbox.c Sun Oct 15 12:44:36 2000 *** *** 21,26 --- 21,27 #include dialog.h #include errno.h + #include sys/types.h #include sys/wait.h #include

binutils breaks world

2002-06-21 Thread Steven G. Kargl
This looks like a causality of David's removal of gdb.291. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ makeinfo --no-validate -I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/../../../../contrib/ binutils/gas/doc -I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/../../../../contrib/binuti ls/ld -I

post-KSE III kernel panic

2002-06-29 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I'm not sure this is related to Julian's commit, but the kernel sources are post-kse III commit. I have the kernel and core file if more info or access is needed. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ Script started on Sat Jun 29 18:36:22 2002 GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627

panic: vm_page_free: freeing wired page

2002-07-03 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Julian, You may have fixed over the last few, but I haven't had a chance to cvsup new sources. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ panic: vm_page_free: freeing wired page panic: from debugger Uptime: 39m56s Dumping 128 MB 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 --- #0 0xc019c5cb in doadump

close PR bin/37795

2002-07-27 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Can someone close PR bin/37795? I am the originator of the PR, and it no longer applies to current version xinstall. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

keyboard probe broken?

2002-09-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
My keybooard is dead after booting a kernel from this morning (Saturday, noon, PST). A good kernel from 2 Sep 02 states: atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 A kernel that yields a dead keyboard says:

panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ panic: from debugger panic messages: --- panic: mutex vnode

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Brian F. Feldman said: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. I think the problem is that in src

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Robert Watson said: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote: One other point, the machine was doing a background fsck on /var. Does a background fsck go through ffs_snapshot()? Yes -- the background file system checker creates a snapshot of the file system in the un-checked state

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Jeff Roberson said: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible

Rev. 1.48 of stdio.h breaks 3rd part software

2002-10-12 Thread Steven G. Kargl
This commit by Peter breaks 3rd party software: Revision 1.48 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], \ Fri Oct 11 22:38:17 2002 UTC (18 hours, 14 minutes ago) by peter Branch: MAIN Changes since 1.47: +0 -8 lines Diff to previous 1.47 (colored) Zap the early-adopter

USER_LDT gone?

2001-02-22 Thread Steven G. Kargl
With the great libc debacle of 2001, I have not tried to update my system for about 2 weeks. In that time I may have missed the commit message that said that USER_LDT, which was needed for at least wine, was removed. root[221] cd /usr/src/ root[222] setenv KERNCONF `hostname -s` root[223] make

top, MAXMEM, sysctl, and missing memory?

2001-03-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I've recently upgraded a system to 384 MB of memory, which the system detects during boot. Dmesg reports real memory = 402587648 (393152K bytes) avail memory = 387903488 (378812K bytes) with or without 'options MAXMEM "(384*1024)"' and "sysctl -a | grep hw" reports hw.physmem:

linux module or linux_devtools problem?

2001-03-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The Portland Group's linux Fortran compiler used to work without a problem, but something has changed that I haven't track down. The script(1) log below suggests two possibilities: (1) the translation of linux syscalls to FreeBSD syscalls isn't working; or (2) the linux ld command (see log)

diskcheckd goes nuts on /dev/cd0

2001-07-04 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I'm sure this is pilot error, but ... I updated a pre june 13th current to a july 3 current. Ran mergemaster and installed /etc/diskcheckd.conf without modification. Upon reboot I saw 1000s of the following message streaming up the console: dscheck(cd0): bio_bcount 512 is not on a sector

Re: diskcheckd goes nuts on /dev/cd0

2001-07-04 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Ben Smithurst said: Steven G. Kargl wrote: last message repeated 3 times diskcheckd[213]: error reading 512 bytes from sector 0 on /dev/cd0 I was gonna commit a fix for this, but after reporting the problem DES never tested the patch I supplied. :-( I'll commit it later hopefully

modules/netgraph/bpf breaks world

1999-12-03 Thread Steven G. Kargl
*** Makefile.orig Fri Dec 3 16:46:54 1999 --- MakefileFri Dec 3 16:46:25 1999 *** *** 6,11 MAN8= ng_bpf.8 KMODDEPS= netgraph ! .PATH:../../../net .include bsd.kmod.mk --- 6,11 MAN8= ng_bpf.8 KMODDEPS=

modules/joy breaks make world

1999-04-19 Thread Steven G. Kargl
FYI. The recent commit to move sys/sys/lkm.h to the attic breaks make world is sys/module/joy. 1.19 Mon Apr 19 14:19:52 1999 UTC by peter CVS Tags: HEAD Diffs to 1.18 FILE REMOVED Zap LKM option and support. Farewell old friend. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to

panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex in ip_output.c

2003-11-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I have a Dell 4150 laptop using dhcp and ntpd on the xl0 interface. I did ifconfig xl0 down and received the following panic (hand transcribed :-( ). panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex (null) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:266 Stack backtrace: backtrace() panic() panic: process 414(ntpd):2

Re: panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex in ip_output.c

2003-11-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Sam Leffler wrote: On Friday 07 November 2003 12:54 pm, Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:31:45AM -0800, Steven G. Kargl wrote: I have a Dell 4150 laptop using dhcp and ntpd on the xl0 interface. I did ifconfig xl0 down and received the following panic (hand transcribed

two lock order reversals

2002-04-02 Thread Steven G. Kargl
lock order reversal 1st 0xc02d9b40 eventhandler @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_eventhandler.c:163 2nd 0xc4050008 shutdown_post_sync @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_eventhandler.c:116 lock order reversal 1st 0xc882cd00 ithread @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:187 2nd 0xc02aa0e0 allproc @

UMA lock order reversal

2002-04-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
This is probably a known lock order reversals, but I haven't seen it reported on the mailing list. lock order reversal 1st 0xc403d720 PCPU 4096 (UMA cpu) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1179 2nd 0xc403d664 4096 (UMA zone) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:614 3rd 0xc082a720 PCPU KMAP ENTRY (UMA cpu)

savecore: parity error ?

2002-04-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The recent changes to savecore/dumpsys are generating the following message at boot: Checking for core dump: Mediasize = 373293056 Sectorsize = 512 savecore: Parity error on last dump header on /dev/da0s2b -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to

bin/cp breaks world

2002-05-10 Thread Steven G. Kargl
=== bin/cp cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -DVM_AND_BUFFER_CACHE_SYNCHRONIZED -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -c /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c: In function `copy': /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c:275:

fatal trap 21 panic in today's current

2002-05-11 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I get the following panic (hand transribed): Fatal trap 21: FPU bounds check fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02433f5 stack pointer= 0x10:c040fc60 frame pointer= 0x10:c040fc7c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b =

patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steven G. Kargl
This applies to post gcc 3.1 upgrades. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ --- bsd.cpu.mk.orig Sat May 11 11:57:01 2002 +++ bsd.cpu.mk Sat May 11 12:00:49 2002 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ . elif ${CPUTYPE} == pentium CPUTYPE = i586 . elif ${CPUTYPE} == athlon -CPUTYPE = k7

patches for [x]install

2002-06-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ --- usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c.origThu Jun 6 22:45:29 2002 +++ usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c Fri Jun 7 17:55:44 2002 @@

Re: patches for [x]install

2002-06-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
J. Mallett said: * From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c I should have stated that if the first patch isn't acceptable, then the remaining patches should be applied

Re: patches for [x]install

2002-06-07 Thread Steven G. Kargl
J. Mallett said: * From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] J. Mallett said: No. The third patch is correct (see below); otherwise I could set INSTALL to install -C QED. And I could set BINOWN to something bogus. Don't protect the user by removing functionality. Well

Re: panic in g_vfs_strategy()

2016-06-22 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:15:27AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 22/06/2016 01:04, Steve Kargl wrote: > > After a forced umount of a msdos filesystem, I received > > a panic. I have the kernel and vmcore. The first hundred > > or so lines of core.txt.4 follow my .sig. > > > > It seems that

Re: Who broke world and how to fix?

2016-07-21 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 03:50:48PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > On 07/21/16 14:32, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Updating uname -a > > FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA5 FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA5 > > #3 r302248: Tue Jun 28 10:11:31 PDT 2016 > > data/obj/usr/src/sys/SPEW amd64 > > > > to top-of-tree > > > > ===>

Re: FreeBSD12-RC2 and bluetooth?

2016-09-15 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:20:06PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > bluetooth uses netgraph. > Yeah, I figured that much out. I do not need bluetooth nor netgraph. How does one explicitly disable this (other than through the BIOS)? -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/

Re: FreeBSD12-RC2 and bluetooth?

2016-09-16 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:07:38PM +0900, Takanori Watanabe wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:20:39PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:20:06PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > bluetooth uses netgraph. > >

Re: System hangs at boot in xhci0

2016-12-09 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:58:21PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 12/09/16 22:09, Steve Kargl wrote: > > I updated my system to > > > > % svn info /usr/src > > Revision: 309748 > > > > Built a shiny new kernel, which hangs during boot. > > There is no panic. Using the dmesg from

Re: System hangs at boot in xhci0

2016-12-10 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:45:30PM -0800, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:58:21PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 12/09/16 22:09, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > I updated my system to > > > > > > % svn info /usr/src > > > Revision

Re: Revision 309657 to stack_machdep.c renders unbootable system

2016-12-14 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:10:48PM -0800, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:14:16PM -0800, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:49:26AM -0800, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > > Well, after 3 days of bisection, I finally found the commit > >

Revision 309657 to stack_machdep.c renders unbootable system

2016-12-14 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Well, after 3 days of bisection, I finally found the commit that renders my system unbootable. The system does not panic. It simply gets stuck in some state. Nonfunctional keyboard, so can't break into debugger. No serial console available. The verbose dmesg.boot for a working kernel from

Re: Revision 309657 to stack_machdep.c renders unbootable system

2016-12-14 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:50:21PM -0800, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:48:04PM -0800, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:10:48PM -0800, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:14:16PM -0800, Mark Johnston wrote: > >

Re: Revision 309657 to stack_machdep.c renders unbootable system

2016-12-19 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > So the hack in pause() is probably not as necessary now. In particular, I > think we only need it for thread0, not for other threads. The patch below > worked for me with SPEW's config: > > Index: kern_synch.c >

Re: Revision 309657 to stack_machdep.c renders unbootable system

2016-12-16 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > So the hack in pause() is probably not as necessary now. In particular, I > think we only need it for thread0, not for other threads. The patch below > worked for me with SPEW's config: > > Index: kern_synch.c >