Re: ATA DMA support is broken

2000-10-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Wesley Morgan wrote: > I'm seeing the same problem on my Tecra 8000: > atapci0: port 0xfe60-0xfe6f at device 5.1 on pci0 > atapci0: Busmastering DMA enabled > ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 > ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 > ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout

-CURRENT clock deviation

2000-10-04 Thread Alain Thivillon
I have noticed that -CURRENT (build last week) is subject to a very high clock deviation: Oct 4 12:14:08 yoko ntpd[674]: time reset 1.367273 s Oct 4 12:14:08 yoko ntpd[674]: synchronisation lost Oct 4 12:32:26 yoko ntpd[674]: synchronisation lost Oct 4 12:41:06 yoko ntpd[674]: time reset 4.3

subscribe

2000-10-04 Thread Marios Andreou
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict?

2000-10-04 Thread Jordan Hubbard
As most people probably know, you can't write on ext2fs filesystems with any of the "newer" Linux distributions, like Red Hat 6.2 on up. The filesystem mount refuses r/w permission with the message "WARNING: R/W mount of # denied due to unsupported optional features" Do we plan to do anything ab

Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict?

2000-10-04 Thread Donn Miller
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > As most people probably know, you can't write on ext2fs filesystems > with any of the "newer" Linux distributions, like Red Hat 6.2 on > up. The filesystem mount refuses r/w permission with the message > "WARNING: R/W mount of # denied due to unsupport

Still no go with Sandisk SM and -current

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, As the subject says, I get the following message from my Tecra8000 and -current: ata4 at port 0x250-0x25f irq 10 slot 1 on pccard1 ata4-master: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata4-master: identify failed pccard: card inserted, slot 1 Attached is the pccardc dumpcis output. I tried with

Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict?

2000-10-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > As most people probably know, you can't write on ext2fs filesystems > with any of the "newer" Linux distributions, like Red Hat 6.2 on > up. The filesystem mount refuses r/w permission with the message > "WARNING: R/W mount of # denied due to unsupport

Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict?

2000-10-04 Thread Jordan Hubbard
> I have 64K off uncommitted diffs (-c2) for ext2fs, but none for sparse > superblocks. This problem is easy to work around by not using > unsupported optional features. Run tune2fs and e2fsck under Linux to > turn off the features (see tune2fs(8)). That's a nice idea and may work in my particu

Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict?

2000-10-04 Thread Mike Meyer
Jordan Hubbard writes: > That's a nice idea and may work in my particular case, but this is > also the out-of-box configuration for Red Hat and most > Linux-to-FreeBSD users wouldn't know a tune2fs if it snuck up and bit > them on the ass in broad daylight. How hard would it be to support > spars