Re: random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-27 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:02:08, mark (Mark Murray) wrote about "Re: random woes ("no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto")": ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8) [...] It seems the compatibility with the previous minor of urandom has been silently removed (I assume

Re: random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-27 Thread George Reid
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Valentin Nechayev wrote: And, my questions are 1) What can happen to refuse RSA support in libcrypto, with environment described above? I suspect you need to remake /dev/urandom. Copy /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV from -current into /etc and remake the device. /dev/urandom is now

Re: random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-27 Thread Mark Murray
See src/UPDATING 2624 Well, but it says about `options RANDOMDEV'. Later, `device random' was invented instead of it. A few days ago I installed -CURRENT (date=2001.03.25.12.00.00) with removing all previous content of /usr/lib (which contained legacy since 3.1-RELEASE) and

top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86 836 root -80 532K 276K biord 1 0:07 0.00% 0.00%

usr.bin/kdump - 'make world' broken?

2001-03-27 Thread Eckhard Kantz
What could be the reason for the following problem? === usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ .. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c ioctl.c In file included from ioctl.c:96: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning:

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Play the ball, not the man. : : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for :

Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. I just cvsupped again (tracking everything on CURRENT branch) but I always run into the following: sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libmd.a

Re: page fault in mpu.c

2001-03-27 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote: I finally tracked down the page fault I was seeing while probing the mpu. The mutex was not being initialized before it was used. I have included a patch below which fixes the problem. Will someone please review the style and commit

Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. I just cvsupped again (tracking everything on CURRENT branch) but I always run into the following: sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libmd.a

Re: usr.bin/kdump - 'make world' broken?

2001-03-27 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:22:51PM +0200, Eckhard Kantz wrote: What could be the reason for the following problem? === usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ .. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c ioctl.c In file included from

Re: usr.bin/kdump - 'make world' broken?

2001-03-27 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:34:49PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:22:51PM +0200, Eckhard Kantz wrote: What could be the reason for the following problem? === usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ ..

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00%

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86 836 root -80

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not one that I've seen: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 49.37% idle: cpu0 10 root -160 0K

BROKEN DRIVER: pcm0: Yamaha DS-1E (YMF744) mem 0xfedf0000-0xfedf7fffirq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0

2001-03-27 Thread Daniel
Hi, I upgraded my kernel today, it was a week old, and when I try to listen anything it sais: pcm0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead I'm in a Sony VAIO XG38. --- PD: Is anyone still working with in the CFS/mount_nfs problem? To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: usr.bin/kdump - 'make world' broken?

2001-03-27 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:17:48PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:34:49PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:22:51PM +0200, Eckhard Kantz wrote: What could be the reason for the following problem? === usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe

Re: Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
gabriel_ambuehl I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. You should have src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c. If you don't have, it's your problem. The CVS repository has this file already: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c

Re[2]: Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Makoto, Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 7:55:15 PM, you wrote: gabriel_ambuehl I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. You should have src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c. If you don't have, it's your problem. The CVS repository

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-27 Thread Doug Barton
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Play the ball, not the man. : : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And : "because System V does it this way"

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-27 Thread Doug Barton
Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Play the ball, not the man. : : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for : us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making

cvsupit assumptions (was: Re: Re[2]: Can't build current...)

2001-03-27 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: I'm using cvsup.de.FreeBSD.org which appears to be a cname cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org. But it looks like, that for some reason, src-secure didn't get added to the cvsupfile (hmm. might be related to the fact that cvsupit creates cvsup.intl for that

Re: Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:55:15AM +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: You should have src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c. If you don't have, it's your problem. The CVS repository has this file already: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c Have

Current for production?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: While I'm writing this: what is the general opinion about having CURRENT on production servers (I'd really love to deploy the ACLs ASAP)? I don't plan to use SMP and can wait for snapshots til the RELEASE comes... Don't. ACL's are still not production

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:46 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm... mine loks like that (modulo #CPUs), except when I'm actually making it do some work (re-building the kernel, in this case). What I see ("top -S") looks like: last pid: 9546; load averages: 0.97,

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Doug Barton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0800: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Play the ball, not the man. : : I don't have an objection

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Also, I happened to note that as I'm doing a "make buildworld" (for today's -STABLE, running in yesterday's -STABLE), my "top -S" output shows a large number of "0.00" entries for CPU (on the same laptop as my previously-reported results). So it may be odd, but at least -- in my case -- it

Re: Current for production?

2001-03-27 Thread Michael Lucas
I'd like to reinforce this: I'm not a hacker, but have a -current box so I can write about it. (It's difficult to write a book targeting 5.1-release and time it for 5.1-R, when you don't have 5-current. This is one definite advantage Greg Lehey has over the rest of us authorial sorts.) With

HEADS UP!! New PAM functionaity in CURRENT!

2001-03-27 Thread Mark Murray
Hello all! I have just added new PAM functionality to CURRENT. There is now better support for account management and sessions. If you foul up your pam.conf merging, you may not be able to get into your system. PLEASE MERGE /etc/pam.conf WITH CARE! At the least, your login section should look

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:45 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keep in mind that we no longer charge interrupt time to the process being interrupted, instead all that interrupt handling has been pushed off into ithreads. Same for software

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK; that's a good useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some IRQ-related entries in top's output. Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s should always add up to about 100 (with

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK; that's a good useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some IRQ-related entries in top's output. Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s

Re: Re[2]: Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread J Wunsch
Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using cvsup.de.FreeBSD.org which appears to be a cname cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org. Huh? That would be a mistake if it happened. But it isn't: j@uriah 159% nslookup cvsup.de.freebsd.org Server: uriah.heep.sax.de Address: 0.0.0.0 Non-authoritative

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86

No Subject

2001-03-27 Thread Ralph Hogge
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

HEADS UP: I'm breaking the kernel again

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
That's right, more SMPng breakage is on the way. Well, hopefully not bad breakage. On a more serious note, I've just spammed sys/alpha/alpha with parts of the critical_enter/exit change which I meant to commit anyways, so I'm going to go ahead and finish committing that right now. The kernel

RE: HEADS UP: I'm breaking the kernel again

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Mar-01 John Baldwin wrote: That's right, more SMPng breakage is on the way. Well, hopefully not bad breakage. On a more serious note, I've just spammed sys/alpha/alpha with parts of the critical_enter/exit change which I meant to commit anyways, so I'm going to go ahead and finish

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-27 Thread Doug Barton
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-)