Re: problem report: optimization

2001-04-26 Thread David Malone
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:47:06PM +0400, Ilya Naumov wrote: i've discovered that now the world cannot be built without any optimization options (-Oxx) due to a 'dirty' code in some places. one of good examples is usr.sbin/rpc.lockd. without -Oxx options kern.c fails compilation: Alfred

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Nik Clayton
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:03:10AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: There's a snapshot of RELNOTESng for -CURRENT, updated irregularly, at: http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ Like it. My main concern is that this is in the src/ tree. As other people have said this is going to complicate

Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary)

2001-04-26 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 6:08 PM -0700 4/25/01, Dima Dorfman wrote: Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dimi has written one or two different patches to xargs. Did ^^^ -- should be 'a', but that's okay. :-) Note that I also wrote: If you need an immediate fix, I'll be happy to change Dimi's

A question about max_uid

2001-04-26 Thread Yoshihiro Koya
Hello, I found the following in the man page of pw(8). -u min,max, -i min,max These options set the minimum and maximum user and group ids allocated for new accounts and groups created by pw. The default values for each is 1000 minimum and 32000 maxi-

xlint as build-tools breaks -DNOCLEAN buildworld

2001-04-26 Thread Alexander Langer
Hi! When starting buildworld with -DNOCLEAN: cd /usr/src/share/syscons/scrnmaps; make build-tools cd /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint; make build-tools make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/stdlib.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint. *** Error code 1 Please

Re: xlint as build-tools breaks -DNOCLEAN buildworld

2001-04-26 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Alexander Langer wrote: Hi! When starting buildworld with -DNOCLEAN: cd /usr/src/share/syscons/scrnmaps; make build-tools cd /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint; make build-tools make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/stdlib.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in

Re: lockup after resume

2001-04-26 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:19:20PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: I am experiencing a strange lockup with -current as of about a week ago: It will suspend and resume, but after the resume the console is dead and the system hangs after a short

Linux JDK 1.3 and hotspot (native threads)

2001-04-26 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
I remember some reports of success running Linux JAVA with native threads on -current. I've tried several times myself, and can't get it to work. The Linux JDK 1.3 (SUN's version) runs fine on -current as well as 4.x as long as I use the classic VM. This version doesn't use native Linux

Re: Keyboard controller locks up during kernel initialization with Belkin KVM switch...

2001-04-26 Thread Jos Backus
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:33:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using a Belkin OmniView SE 4-port PS/2 KVM switch at home to toggle between my 4 Unix boxen. Are you using version 1.5 of the OmniView (see bottom)? Belkin says this problem is fixed in version 1.9, so you may wish to give

Keyboard controller locks up during kernel initialization with Belkin KVM switch...

2001-04-26 Thread estair
I'm using a Belkin OmniView SE 4-port PS/2 KVM switch at home to toggle between my 4 Unix boxen. The problem I'm having is that on the machine running 5-CURRENT if I power on the system (or reboot) when the active switch port is anything other than the BSD box the system boots ok but I cannot

Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary)

2001-04-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:08:15PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. obrien: that's a very clever and unintrusive way of avoiding getting two copies of a message; much better than

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:06:12PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Beaupre (LMC) writ es: : Hey whatever. Let's just keep a rendered TXT version where it always : (ie. in the src/release... cvs) was but keep the

cp -u patch

2001-04-26 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
Please test this further. This adds -u to our cp, which is a reimplemented GNU feature after Jim Mock asked me if we supported -u in our cp. Basically cp -u compares src and dest and only overwrites if dest's mtime src's mtime. Only caveat which I haven't yet solved is that it still shows

Re: cp -u patch

2001-04-26 Thread John W. De Boskey
You are one brave soul if the only precedent you have for this patch is GNU cp. Personally, I see nothing wrong with it. With respect to how you short circuit the copy if the mtimes are 'ok', you probably need to return a value different than 1 so that your caller can distinquish between a

Re: cp -u patch

2001-04-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:You are one brave soul if the only precedent you have for this :patch is GNU cp. : :Personally, I see nothing wrong with it. : :With respect to how you short circuit the copy if :the mtimes are 'ok', you probably need to return a value :different than 1 so that your caller can distinquish

Re: cp -u patch

2001-04-26 Thread Matt Dillon
:You are one brave soul if the only precedent you have for this :patch is GNU cp. : :Personally, I see nothing wrong with it. The time check is broken, for one. Any adjustment to the system time has the potential to screw up the feature. The time check must be T1 != T2, not T1

Re: PATCH to make maxfiles, maxfiles per proc boot-time tunable

2001-04-26 Thread Terry Lambert
] The problem is that param.c is *not* included in gensetdefs scope. ] Therefore linker set entries (ie: SYSINIT etc) are not executed. TUNABLE* ] entries in param.c are simply not called or used. ] ] SYSTEM_OBJS= locore.o setdef0.o vnode_if.o ${OBJS} ioconf.o param.o config.o \ ]

Re: WITNESS + WITNESS_SKIPSPIN = panic

2001-04-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any progress on fixing this? I posted a patch a couple of months ago. Search the archives. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: Boot messages

2001-04-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The ``can't assign resources'' messages indicate that the devices are legacy ISA devices for which a non-PnP-aware driver is compiled into the kernel. Wrong. If it didn't say ``can't assign resources'', then *and only then* is the device in

Upgrading from 4-STABLE to 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread H. Wade Minter
Greetings, I'm trying to upgrade my 4-STABLE box at home to 5-CURRENT to play around with some new stuff. I haven't done an upgrade like this before, usually staying on the -STABLE path. I cvsup'd the sources using tag=. as shown in the standard supfile. However, when I try to do a make

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Nik Clayton
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:58:43AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: This problem (which I agree is valid) is not so much a problem as to where the release notes live, but the fact that one needs to actually build human-readable renderings of them. If people can't be bothered to install the

Re: PATCH to make maxfiles, maxfiles per proc boot-time tunable

2001-04-26 Thread John Baldwin
On 26-Apr-01 Terry Lambert wrote: ] The problem is that param.c is *not* included in gensetdefs scope. ] Therefore linker set entries (ie: SYSINIT etc) are not executed. TUNABLE* ] entries in param.c are simply not called or used. ] ] SYSTEM_OBJS= locore.o setdef0.o vnode_if.o ${OBJS}

Re: cp -u patch

2001-04-26 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MD There is a whole lot more to doing an efficient copy then simply checking MD the mtime. It's silly to try to integrate it into 'cp'. Use cpdup MD instead. plug plug plug. OK plug away - why

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote: Like it. OK, thanks, that's a good start... My main concern is that this is in the src/ tree. As other people have said this is going to complicate things for src/ folks who just want up to date release notes, This problem (which I agree is

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:06:12PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Beaupre (LMC) writes: : Hey whatever. Let's just keep a rendered TXT version where it always : (ie. in the src/release... cvs) was but keep the originial as a sgml : version in the doc tree.