Hi -current people,
I have recently made some significant changes to the mbuf allocator.
Although I have invested, along with several other developers, very significant
time in testing the newly introduced code, should any problems arise, please
let me know ASAP.
One noticeable
* Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 01:47] wrote:
Hi -current people,
I have recently made some significant changes to the mbuf allocator.
Although I have invested, along with several other developers, very significant
time in testing the newly introduced code, should any
mark This looks right to me. One main PIIX4 ATA controller with two
mark independent IDE channels (usually referred to as a Primary and a
mark Secondary IDE controller). Usually the PC BIOS will allow you to
mark turn on/off these channels independently. Does your bios allow
mark you to turn off
ache wi-ftpd already have OPIE hooks, but I not sure they works. Popper needs
ache modifications. Doesn't know, if other ports using Skey exists.
security/sudo uses it:
sudo ldd /usr/local/bin/sudo
Password [ s/key 135 ho9319 ]:
/usr/local/bin/sudo:
libmd.so.2 = /usr/lib/libmd.so.2
It seems Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
% atacontrol info 0
Master: ad0 IBM-DJSA-220/JS4OAC3A ATA/ATAPI rev 5
Slave: no device present
% atacontrol info 1
Master: no device present
Slave: no device present
% atacontrol info 2
%
Hmm, ata driver says there are two buses.
Sudo also has a --with-opie option in configure. I don't remember why it
isn't in the standard sudo port tho.
Michael
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:14:41AM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
ache wi-ftpd already have OPIE hooks, but I not sure they works. Popper needs
ache modifications.
sos make
In current as of 5 mins ago:
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi
-g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../dev -I../../contrib/dev/acpica
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:02:37 MST, T.J. Kniveton wrote:
Everything is working ok, but this is my development laptop, and it
would probably be wiser to track -stable so that things will still work.
I have grabbed the RELENG_4 source, but it is dying at unctrl.h. Is
there any way to go
On line 336 of the script, you export dead air, resulting in
and Makefile.conf handles that in a way
similar to the one you show below.
CONFIG=${CONFIG:-config}
cheers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the
I found logs from ipfw(8) and ip6fw(8) are stored to different place.
Former one is into security.info via syslog(3) but latter one is
into kern.crit via kernel printf().
The reason of this difference is came from missing merge from
ip_fw.c. And I hope this patch will be first step to
Why? Better way will be rewritting ports to use good-new OPIE.
wi-ftpd already have OPIE hooks, but I not sure they works. Popper needs
modifications. Doesn't know, if other ports using Skey exists.
I can do base software, but I haven't time to fill all ports.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this
Hi,
with current as of June 20 I can no longer print to a remote printer.
Syslog says filter 'f' exited (retcode=108).
I added a set -x to the filter which is a shell program, and sure
enough the last action it does is an exit 0. So the problem must be
somewhere in lpd.
--
Regards,
Georg.
Peter Wemm writes:
Michael C . Wu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:07:25PM +0100, David Malone scribbled:
| On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:39:55PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
| While we're at it, I know that the AMD AthlonMP supports SSE, but I
I think we already detect
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:26:39PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On line 336 of the script, you export dead air, resulting in
and Makefile.conf handles that in a way
similar to the one you show below.
Luigi, you cannot run dead air. Makefile.conf only handles that
if the variable does not
Hi!
The attached patch replaces ucred.cr_groups[0] with ucred.cr_gid.
This is mostly needed for POSIX alignment. setegid(2) etc. should
not change supplementary groups set.
Also, type of grp.h's group.gr_gid changed to a more natural
gid_t (also as in POSIX).
getgrouplist(3)'s and
sos Thats because of the runtime attach/detach code in current, if the
sos channel HW is there, its attached so you can add a device later
sos with atacontrol without having to boot. In -stable the channel is
sos not attached if no devices are present at probe time.
Thanks for your clear
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
On 22-Jun-2001 Bosko Milekic wrote:
Hi -current people,
I have recently made some
I would think not.
Bosko might be gone now. I'll look at this as soon as a CVS update continues.
It's odd, though. A GENERIC kernel built for me yesterday w/o problems.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:06:34 +0900,
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kuriyama I found logs from ipfw(8) and ip6fw(8) are stored to different place.
kuriyama Former one is into security.info via syslog(3) but latter one is
kuriyama into kern.crit via kernel printf().
kuriyama The reason of
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:45:50AM -0400, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
It turns out
Fixed temporarily at least.
It seems that the stuff checked in last night is a fair amount different from
the patches I was given to test on alpha. If this is so, this is really not
right or fair.
-matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:51:55AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I would think not.
Bosko might be gone now. I'll look at this as soon as a CVS update continues.
It's odd, though. A GENERIC kernel built for me yesterday w/o problems.
Nah, don't worry. I'm still here (and plan to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:03:43AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Fixed temporarily at least.
It seems that the stuff checked in last night is a fair amount different from
the patches I was given to test on alpha. If this is so, this is really not
right or fair.
No, it's the same
Oh. oops... pointed hit poked in my for me I tested your stuff on a
completely different tree, so, well, do, the conf/files stuff would have been
the same.
And Alpha has SMP on by default.
It's okay! Nobody got killed!
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22,
It seems Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
sos Thats because of the runtime attach/detach code in current, if the
sos channel HW is there, its attached so you can add a device later
sos with atacontrol without having to boot. In -stable the channel is
sos not attached if no devices are present at
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:52:01AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
If you want accurate stats you should be able to lock the per-cpu
stats areas all at once as long as you always do it in a certain
order, basically, lock CPU 0, then 1, then 2, then 3, sum then
unlock. If correctness doesn't
On 22-Jun-01 Dave Cornejo wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Actuually, KTR is your friend here. :) Read the ktr(4) manpage, then
compile a
kernel with KTR_MASK and KTR_COMPILE set to KTR_INTR|KTR_PROC. Then when it
hangs, break into DDB and look at the longs via 'show ktr' to see if you can
Luigi, you cannot run dead air. Makefile.conf only handles that
if the variable does not exist, not if the variable is empty.
ok my fault :)
luigi
CONFIG=${CONFIG:-config}
cheers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
At 2:42 PM +0200 6/22/01, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Hi,
with current as of June 20 I can no longer print to a remote printer.
Syslog says filter 'f' exited (retcode=108).
I added a set -x to the filter which is a shell program, and sure
enough the last action it does is an exit 0. So the
On 22-Jun-01 Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
kuriyama I got message below with WITNESS option. Is this safe to ignore?
I've found another WITNESS message (5-current CVSuped Jun/18/2001):
lock order reversal
1st 0xc5d2043c process lock @ ../../vm/vm_glue.c:487
2nd 0xc05a9ec0 lockmgr
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
Yes, I asked for this months
btw, regarding gcc's -O2 optimization breakage on -2.95.x and improved
instrumentation of the new compiler kit, is there someone working on
getting gcc-3.0 into -current?
...yes *sigh* i know, 3.0 is _not_ stable, neither is -current ;-)
/k
Dag-Erling Smorgrav([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.21
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:22:32PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
btw, regarding gcc's -O2 optimization breakage on -2.95.x and improved
instrumentation of the new compiler kit, is there someone working on
getting gcc-3.0 into -current?
It will come with time.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:35:32AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:32:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
mp_ncpus implies SMP (mp_ prefix). If you want to make it ncpus and move it to
sys/systm.h and stick it somewhere MI initialized to 1 that is fine. Then
hw.ncpus can reference that (well, it's called hw.ncpu right now,
On 22-Jun-01 Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:35:32AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c
sos Well, sortof, the ata driver doesn't allow for sharing irq1415
sos since lots of boards doesn't work that way. However if you need
sos it you can try to add the shared flag in the driver and see if
sos it works on yours.
I've changed src/sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.c with:
--- ata-pci.c.dist
jhb Can you turn on WITNESS_DDB in your kenrel config file (or set
jhb the debug.witness_ddb loader tunable/sysctl before you get this
jhb reversal) and get a backtrace from ddb?
Yes; I turned 'debug.witness_ddb' on now. I'll send a ddb 'trace'
output if next time lock-order-reversal is happen.
On 22-Jun-01 Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
jhb Can you turn on WITNESS_DDB in your kenrel config file (or set
jhb the debug.witness_ddb loader tunable/sysctl before you get this
jhb reversal) and get a backtrace from ddb?
Yes; I turned 'debug.witness_ddb' on now. I'll send a ddb 'trace'
tacho lock order reversal
tacho 1st 0xc03f0140 mntvnode @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1007
tacho 2nd 0xcaec972c vnode interlock @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1016
matusita Exactly the same kernel message was here.
ddb trace output is as follows.
db trace
Debugger(c02bd5ae) at
At 2:42 PM +0200 6/22/01, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Hi,
with current as of June 20 I can no longer print to a remote printer.
Syslog says filter 'f' exited (retcode=108).
Looking at that section of code, lpd is just doing:
if (ifilter 0)
status.w_retcode = 100;
¿Ë·RªºªB¤Í; ¦b¦¹´£¨Ñ2001¦~³Ì·s¸£¤O¶}µo§Þ³N
«e¨¥:
®Ú¾Ú¬ì¾Ç¬ã¨sÅã¥Ü¡A§Ṳ́HÃþ¤j¸£¥i§l¦¬°O¾Ð2000¸U¥»¹Ï®Ñ¤j·§10ӹϮÑÀ]
¤§¶q¡A¥un²ß±o¥¿½Tªº°O¾Ð¤èªk¡A¥²¯à±N§Ṳ́j¸£µo´§²OºvºÉP¡A¹ï¤H¡A¨Æ
¡Aª«¥t¦³¤@µf¤£¦P¨¤«×¨£¸Ñ¡AÂǦ¹½Òµ{¦@¦P±´¯Á¤j¸£¤F¯«©_¡C
¡·§Ú̪º±M·~
§Ų́㦳¥¿²Îªº^°êMind
Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
btw, regarding gcc's -O2 optimization breakage on -2.95.x and improved
instrumentation of the new compiler kit, is there someone working on
getting gcc-3.0 into -current?
...yes *sigh* i know, 3.0 is _not_ stable, neither is -current ;-)
Does it do tail-call
I got same backtrace.
Additional daemons: syslogdlock order reversal
1st 0xc044fc80 mntvnode @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1007
2nd 0xcb1ef8ac vnode interlock @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1016
Debugger(witness_lock)
Stopped at Debugger+0x44: pushl %ebx
db trace
Debugger(c038c22e) at
45 matches
Mail list logo
