Re: 3CXFE575CT-JP with NEWCARD doesn't work

2001-11-16 Thread Yoichi NAKAYAMA
Hi, I build kernel with NEWCARD from source cvsup'ed today. Following patch is still needed for my machine card. Without this, the card appear as /boot/kernel/kernel: xl0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 and the card does not work. Best regards, -- Yoichi NAKAYAMA At Wed, 5 Sep 2001

ACPI/PSM/PCCARD Woes

2001-11-16 Thread Eric Liedtke
I have a Dell Latitude C Family Model:PPX laptop. I recently upgraded from 4.4 to 5.0 so I could use the 32-bit Xircom ethernet adapter I had. I cvsup'd rebuilt world and kernel yesterday and these are the problems I am having. 1. If I let the acpi module load I don't have a /dev/psm* entry

Re: make installworld failure in usr.bin/tip

2001-11-16 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Mark, Poul-Henning, So, what was the concensus? Should we fix this in Makefile, or just put this as an UPDATING entry and have users manually remove the old UUCP stuff? On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: === usr.bin/tip install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555

subscribe

2001-11-16 Thread Jonathan Donaldson
subscribe freebsd-current Thanks, Jonathan - Jonathan Donaldson Technical Marketing Engineer Cisco Systems - Enterprise Solutions Engineering 7025 Kit Creek Rd RTP, NC 27709 Office: 919-392-9922 Cell: 919-523-5037

test

2001-11-16 Thread Brian K. White
testing... I think I posted a note yesterday and I still don't see it, so I'm trying again Brian K. White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/ +[+++[-]-]+..+.+++.-.[+---]++. filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans Satriani To

test

2001-11-16 Thread Brian K. White
testing... Brian K. White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/ +[+++[-]-]+..+.+++.-.[+---]++. filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans Satriani To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

ibcs

2001-11-16 Thread Brian K. White
what is the status of ibcs in -current ? I'm subscribed to the list now but only have been for a few days if this is a faq. Brian K. White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/ +[+++[-]-]+..+.+++.-.[+---]++. filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD

Re: test

2001-11-16 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Friday 16 November 2001 07:09, Brian K. White wrote: testing... Brian K. White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/ +[+++[-]-]+..+.+++.-.[+---] ++. filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans Satriani kindly use [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BTX issue, and general report on SMP issues...

2001-11-16 Thread Jim Bryant
It's not the BIOS failing it... The BTX bootstrap loader V 1.00 detects the keyboard, and refuses to proceed without it. Chris Dempsey wrote: Try changing the BIOS options regarding failing on all errors. After changing my Tyan Thunder K7 to not fail on keyboard failures, it was able to

Re: BTX issue, and general report on SMP issues...

2001-11-16 Thread John Baldwin
On 16-Nov-01 Jim Bryant wrote: It's not the BIOS failing it... The BTX bootstrap loader V 1.00 detects the keyboard, and refuses to proceed without it. Err, no. BTX cares zero, zilch, nada about keyboards. Can you please provide the error message you get? -- John Baldwin [EMAIL

Re: BTX issue, and general report on SMP issues...

2001-11-16 Thread Mike Smith
It's not the BIOS failing it... The BTX bootstrap loader V 1.00 detects the keyboard, and refuses to proceed without it. The BTX loader does not detect or care about the keyboard at all. You have another problem, and you need to supply more details before we can be of any more assistance.

re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
For work related erasons I've been in the IP stack (basically just IP actually) recently. It's obvious that there are re-entrancy problems there. Here are two examples.. Routed packets: a packet that is routed, uses a single static 'route' entry... (In ip_input.c) Right next to it is a

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Peter Wemm
Julian Elischer wrote: [..] What is needed is obviously a 'per packet' storage location for those things, defined in a per protocol family manner. Luigi has already tried this scheme by defining a dummynet specific mbuf type that can be prepended to the front of packets. What I suggest

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: As another example, the ipfw code uses a couple of static variables too, in the 'fwd' code amongst other places.. What is needed is obviously a 'per packet' storage location for those things, defined in a per protocol family

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Luigi Rizzo
struct pkthdr already has a field (struct mbuf *aux) which i think is used to store info per-packet state by ipsec, at least according to the comment (my dummynet hack predated this, i would have used this field if it had been available at the time). So this field could be used to access the

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:02:51PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: it. MT_DUMMYNET must die, not be propagated elsewhere. i agree! cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06 18:02] wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [..] What is needed is obviously a 'per packet' storage location for those things, defined in a per protocol family manner. Luigi has already tried this scheme by defining a dummynet specific mbuf type that

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: As another example, the ipfw code uses a couple of static variables too, in the 'fwd' code amongst other places.. What is needed is obviously a 'per packet' storage location

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06 18:20] wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: Um, no please. MT_DUMMYNET is a bad hack that should be removed (and which I've partly done in one of my trees). I would rather not perpetuate this, it causes more problems than it is

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:02:51PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: it. MT_DUMMYNET must die, not be propagated elsewhere. i agree! cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Luigi Rizzo
so far there hasn't been a lot of suggestion as to how the goal can be achieved however.. i actually suggested one i.e. have explicit pointers to metadata area(s) in the pkthdr. I think you forget the most fundamental feature which is performance. This is way more important than flexibility i

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:13:41 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: (and anyhow Garrett got rid of the 'static' uses of mbufs, not 'travelling' 'per packet' uses..) Only because I did not have the time or stomach then to introduce `struct packet' everywhere. All of the queueing

building cvsup from ports

2001-11-16 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, Sounds like a silly place to post this but...here goes. I'm getting errors compiling cvsup from ports. The ports tree installed is the default coming with the 11/12/01 snapshot. I want would use CVS, but I don't know how (and yet I call my self a computer science student). It

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
ok, so how would you envision it? example? Adding fields to the pkthdr? (and flags to say what they are used for). A pointer to route, (maybe the route in ip_forward() can be dynamically allocated on the stack, I'm not sure yet) A pointer to a sockaddr, with a flag to say if it's for 'fwd' use

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:13:41 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: (and anyhow Garrett got rid of the 'static' uses of mbufs, not 'travelling' 'per packet' uses..) Only because I did not have the time or stomach then to

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: so far there hasn't been a lot of suggestion as to how the goal can be achieved however.. i actually suggested one i.e. have explicit pointers to metadata area(s) in the pkthdr. I think you forget the most fundamental feature which is

Need a Home Loan? Let Us Help!

2001-11-16 Thread Alex Brown
Title: Free Rate Quote Refinance Your Current Mortgage While Rates Are LOW!! HOME EQUITY LOANS *** JUMBO LOANS *** HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS *** DEBT CONSOLIDATION LOANS *** REFINANCE LOANS *** ALL ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU *** RATES AS LOW AS 3.95% Mortgage

Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack.

2001-11-16 Thread Robert Watson
In my MAC tree, I add an additional: struct mbuf *aux; /* extra data buffer; ipsec/others */ + struct mac label; /* label of data in packet */ }; As we move towards more generalized access control, it would similarly be nice to have a place to 'hang'