WI Driver issues, compile of kernel dies, after fidling it drops to db

2002-04-12 Thread Jason
Dunno what I am doing wrong, maybe I am just missing something. I am trying to get my dlink wireless DWL 520 to compile. If I delete /usr/src/sys, and re cvsup to get clean sources (this is a source as of 4am eastern on the 12th April) and run make KERNCONF=HELB buildkernel, it always dies on the

pam_rhost Re: rshd on 5.0-DP1

2002-04-12 Thread Danny Braniss
for what it's worth, i've set up a pam_rhost: ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/pam_rhost To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

WI Driver issues, compile of kernel dies, after fidling it drops to db

2002-04-12 Thread Jason
Dunno what I am doing wrong, maybe I am just missing something. I am trying to get my dlink wireless DWL 520 to compile. If I delete /usr/src/sys, and re cvsup to get clean sources (this is a source as of 4am eastern on the 12th April) and run make KERNCONF=HELB buildkernel, it always dies on the

Possible bug in /sys/i386/pci/pci_cfgreg.c

2002-04-12 Thread Klaus Leibrandt
Hi Folks. I spent some time tracking down my CardBus problem and found the following: In /sys/i386/pci/pci_cfgreg.c: In Function: static int pci_cfgintr_linked(struct PIR_entry *pe, int pin): There you can find this code (my changes included): /* link destination mapped to a

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
I see the same breakage here. The breakage has nothing to do with -Werror. Recent commit by Mike Barcroft to sys/*/endian.h is the culprit. But the actual problem is with gdb. After a lot of experimenting I've found that contrib/gdb.291/gdb/defs.h includes nm.h

World broken?

2002-04-12 Thread John Baldwin
I've seen this twice now on both alpha and sparc64. It looks to be related to the ENDIAN macro changes: === usr.bin/ldd /arch/sparc64/hosted/bin/gcc -O -pipe -Wall-c /home/john/work/p4/sparc64/usr.bin/ldd/ldd.c In file included from /home/john/work/p4/sparc64/usr.bin/ldd/ldd.c:36:

Re: World broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Do we already have the in-tree toolchain capable of cross-building sparc64? On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:24:31AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: I've seen this twice now on both alpha and sparc64. It looks to be related to the ENDIAN macro changes: === usr.bin/ldd /arch/sparc64/hosted/bin/gcc -O

Re: Possible bug in /sys/i386/pci/pci_cfgreg.c

2002-04-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: Pine.GSO.4.44.0204121353110.3002-10@sunhalle19 Klaus Leibrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hi Folks. : : I spent some time tracking down my CardBus problem and found the : following: : : In /sys/i386/pci/pci_cfgreg.c: : In Function: static int

Re: World broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've seen this twice now on both alpha and sparc64. It looks to be related to the ENDIAN macro changes: [...] I guess all of those symbols are not defined or something and so have values of 0 and 0 == 0? sys/wait.h includes machine/endian.h right

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see the same breakage here. The breakage has nothing to do with -Werror. Recent commit by Mike Barcroft to sys/*/endian.h is the culprit. But the actual problem is with gdb. After a lot of experimenting I've found that

bsd.prog.mk 1.108 - 1.110

2002-04-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! I'm really sorry for 8 hours of breakage between bsd.prog.mk,v 1.108 and bsd.prog.mk,v 1.110. (Testing with the -DNOCLEAN buildworld wasn't a good idea at all.) Sorry about that, it should be fixed now. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:12:12PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see the same breakage here. The breakage has nothing to do with -Werror. Recent commit by Mike Barcroft to sys/*/endian.h is the culprit. But the actual problem is with gdb.

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:12:12PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: I think machine/endian.h would be better here. It may not have worked because of the missing sys/cdefs.h issue. We will never get that header included in the GDB sources -- it is totally FreeBSD (NetBSD also?) specific. It

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:12:12PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: I think machine/endian.h would be better here. It may not have worked because of the missing sys/cdefs.h issue. We will never get that header included in the GDB sources -- it is

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sort of. The way it historically built was by taking advantage of the fact that C allows multiple #define's if they are the same. My commit changed the definition of BYTE_ORDER to _BYTE_ORDER instead of LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN. Just a little

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:01:58PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: the source file. machine/endian.h (apparently this is spelled endian.h on other systems) should always be included before fiddling Should we add a /usr/include/endian.h symlink to machine/endian.h ? if we are the odd-man-out? To

Re: World broken?

2002-04-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Apr-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Do we already have the in-tree toolchain capable of cross-building sparc64? No, we need gcc3.1 in the tree for that. -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Power Users Use the Power to Serve! - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:16:59AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:01:58PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: the source file. machine/endian.h (apparently this is spelled endian.h on other systems) should always be included before fiddling Should we add a

RE: WI Driver issues, compile of kernel dies, after fidling it drops to db

2002-04-12 Thread Jason
I hate replying to my own posts.. Anyways.. It appears The machine I was using as a test machine Either does not support pci 2.2 or is hosed (I'm voting for the latter as the bios seems to be losing its settings every so often)... So you can ignore the long winded issues I type below,

Vinum problems

2002-04-12 Thread Patrick Hartling
I suffered a system crash earlier today running -current from April 10. I have a Vinum volume set up as a mirror, and during the reboot, I had to fsck it. Everything seemed normal (at least that's what I thought), but now my volume cannot be mounted. The output from 'vinum list' is as

Re: Vinum problems

2002-04-12 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Patrick Hartling wrote: ... 2 drives: D a State: up /dev/da3s1e A: 0/12288 MB (0%) D b State: up /dev/da4s1e A: 0/12288 MB (0%) The fact that it says the drives have 0% used greatly concerns me. Thats 0% free.

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It would be helpful to include more build context (i.e. not just the stderr messages) so that it's possible to distinguish non-fatal warnings (no -Werror) from fatal warnings (-Werror) or errors. http://people.freebsd.org/~des/${arch}.log has everything

Problem with rl

2002-04-12 Thread John Angelmo
Hello I just installed FreeBSD 5.0-DP1 and for some reason my rl (ethernet device rl) card is detected but not installed, is this a known problem? perhaps theres something missing in device.hints? I'll give it a try to paste info from my dmesg but it's hard to write down with pencil/paper ;)

sort and gperf

2002-04-12 Thread Clive Lin
Hi, sort and gperf was not installed after make world. I think sort is easy to deal with, but I have no idea about gperf. Does this intend to be ? (On regular i386 platform, of course) sort: --- gnu/usr.bin/Makefile.orig Sat Apr 13 02:16:45 2002 +++ gnu/usr.bin/MakefileSat Apr 13