Re: bad tcp cksum fffe!

2002-05-16 Thread Cristan Szmajda
Dear Giorgos, Thanks for your suggestion! The problem has gone away by backing off to -O1 in kernel and -O2 in userland. Strange, because I have been using -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer for a while now (/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf notwithstanding) with ill effects. My bad. Sorry, but I

Re: loader failure

2002-05-16 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 15 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 15-May-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The kernel overflowed it's stack. In SRM, you can try to debug this by using 'e sp' to get the stack pointer then get a stack dump and save a copy of it in a log or

/usr/ports/emulators/bochs on -CURRENT

2002-05-16 Thread Riccardo Torrini
# grep BOCHS /etc/make.conf WITH_BOCHS_CPU_LEVEL= 6 WITH_BOCHS_PROCESSORS= 1 # uname -v FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Wed May 8 02:31:46 CEST 2002 [...] # cd /usr/ports/emulators/bochs make [...] gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/bochs/work/bochs-1.4/iodev' [...] c++ -c -O2

Re: don't know how to make buildincludes in buildworld from -stable to -current

2002-05-16 Thread Hans Lambermont
more info on this problem: Hans Lambermont wrote: cd /usr/src; make buildincludes; make installincludes make: don't know how to make buildincludes. Stop I found the buildincludes target in share/mk/bsd.incs.mk These mk files should have been used ( MAKE= PATH=${PATH} make -m

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Thomas David Rivers
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas David Rivers wrote: Well - it's not counter-intuitive on many machines... For example, on the IBM mainframe - there is an instruction to load a character into a register - but not one that loads *and* sign-extends. So, you can get much

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Akinori MUSHA
[CC: obrien, who has been working on bringing in gcc 3.1] At Wed, 15 May 2002 20:46:06 -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: So - yes - it seems gcc 3.1 does have a problem... Indeed - easily determined by breaking down the expression. So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?... int main()

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Akinori MUSHA wrote: [CC: obrien, who has been working on bringing in gcc 3.1] At Wed, 15 May 2002 20:46:06 -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?... int main() { unsigned char i = 127; char j; printf(%d\n,

Re: don't know how to make buildincludes in buildworld from -stableto -current

2002-05-16 Thread Michael D. Harnois
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 05:42, Hans Lambermont wrote: Is anyone else able to upgrade from stable to current ? I'm running current, and I'm experiencing the same problem you are. -- Michael D. Harnois bilocational bivocational Pastor, Redeemer Lutheran Church

pqv @mBGRx

2002-05-16 Thread esbeor1f
¿¬¾Ö¶õ ³²ÀÚ°¡ ´Ü ÇÑ »ç¶÷ÀÇ ¿©ÀÚ¿¡ ¸¸Á·Çϱâ À§ÇØ Ä¡·ç´Â ³ë·ÂÀÌ´Ù. -Ç® Á¦¶ó¸£µð ±¸Çؼ­ ¾òÀº »ç¶ûÀº ÁÁÀº °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±¸ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¾òÀº °ÍÀº ´õ¿í ÁÁ´Ù. -¼ÎÀͽºÇÇ¾î »ç¶ûÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀλýÀÌ´Ù. ±â»ÝÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °÷¿¡ »ç¶÷°ú »ç¶÷ »çÀÌÀÇ °áÇÕÀÌ ¹ÞÀ¸½Ã´Â ºÐ²² ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸°¡ µÇ±æ ¹Ù¶ó¸ç º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ±×·¸Áö

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Akinori MUSHA
I've submitted a bug report to GCC GNATS: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gccpr=6677cmd=view+audit-trail Let's see how they handle this. -- / /__ __Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org /

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:31:19PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: So - yes - it seems gcc 3.1 does have a problem... Indeed - easily determined by breaking down the expression. So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?... Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Bill Fenner
Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take the ISO-C spec and explain the problem. Or even w/o the spec -- I haven't been reading this thread. int main() { unsigned char i = 127; char j; printf(%d\n, ((char)(i 1))); This prints -2, which is

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:06:49PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take the ISO-C spec and explain the problem. Or even w/o the spec -- I haven't been reading this thread. int main() { unsigned char i = 127; char j;

Re: /usr/ports/emulators/bochs on -CURRENT

2002-05-16 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:14:01PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # cd /usr/ports/emulators/bochs make [...] gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/bochs/work/bochs-1.4/iodev' [...] c++ -c -O2 -pipe -march=pentiumpro -fno-rtti

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Sounds like you should forward this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) CC audit@ (and current@) so we can all see what the GNU people say. Don't forget to show the output of `cc -v'. knu has already created a gnats pr with gcc and posted the url. -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree

Re: Skipping certain buildworld stages (was: Re: make includes)

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:07:25AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: it's possible to achieve this with: : make \ : -DNO_worldtmp -DNO_bootstrap-tools -DNO_cleanobj -DNO_obj \ : -DNO_build-tools -DNO_cross-tools \ : buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foo Which in essence is equivalent to

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-16 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: make: don't know how to make style.perl.7. Stop *** Error code 2 This was fixed a few hours ago. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-16 Thread Eric Masson
Warner == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Warner H, I've found that the Intel PRO/Wireless are 5.0V devices. Warner Maybe this is a different card than what I'm used to dealing Warner with. From the reseller, this is the main difference beetween 2011 2011b (chipset difference

Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread Christopher Weimann
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RS/6000's didn't used to use PPC processors at all; so it's probably intentional software compatability. I'm confused then - the one we have here seems to. There was a version

__FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Ade Lovett
Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles. Thanks, -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Maxime Henrion
Ade Lovett wrote: Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles. I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Ade Lovett
On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always simply use sed for this ? Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it needs to be

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:52:45PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always simply use sed for this ? Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it Ade needs to be conditional on ${OSVERSION}. Why can't we use ed for in-place edits? --lyndon To

Re: [PATCH] cross-arch bootstrapping is broken by GCC 3.1

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:31:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: This actually doesn't affect only cross-arch case, the subject is wrong. It affects any arch with HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT HOST_BITS_PER_LONG e.g. alpha. This *is* only a cross issue. HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT == HOST_BITS_PER_LONG

HEADS UP: ALTQ integration developer preview

2002-05-16 Thread Adrian Penisoara
We have started a ALTQ integration in FreeBSD project which is headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD 5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been advised and we have received on principle approval. We are looking for help with

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: Why can't we use ed for in-place edits? perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y} is not as easy to do with `ed'. People should find

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y} is not as easy to do with `ed'. It's not *that* hard. 10 lines of shell script is preferable to XX MB of perl bloat. Especially for this sort of problem. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it Ade needs to be conditional on