Dear Giorgos,
Thanks for your suggestion! The problem has gone away by
backing off to -O1 in kernel and -O2 in userland. Strange,
because I have been using -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer for a
while now (/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf notwithstanding)
with ill effects. My bad.
Sorry, but I
On Wed, 15 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
On 15-May-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The kernel overflowed it's stack. In SRM, you can try to debug this
by using 'e sp' to get the stack pointer then get a stack dump and save
a copy of it in a log or
# grep BOCHS /etc/make.conf
WITH_BOCHS_CPU_LEVEL= 6
WITH_BOCHS_PROCESSORS= 1
# uname -v
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Wed May 8 02:31:46 CEST 2002 [...]
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/bochs make
[...]
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/bochs/work/bochs-1.4/iodev'
[...]
c++ -c -O2
more info on this problem:
Hans Lambermont wrote:
cd /usr/src; make buildincludes; make installincludes
make: don't know how to make buildincludes. Stop
I found the buildincludes target in share/mk/bsd.incs.mk
These mk files should have been used (
MAKE= PATH=${PATH} make -m
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Well - it's not counter-intuitive on many machines... For example,
on the IBM mainframe - there is an instruction to load a character
into a register - but not one that loads *and* sign-extends. So,
you can get much
[CC: obrien, who has been working on bringing in gcc 3.1]
At Wed, 15 May 2002 20:46:06 -0700,
Bill Fenner wrote:
So - yes - it seems gcc 3.1 does have a problem...
Indeed - easily determined by breaking down the expression.
So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?...
int
main()
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[CC: obrien, who has been working on bringing in gcc 3.1]
At Wed, 15 May 2002 20:46:06 -0700,
Bill Fenner wrote:
So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?...
int
main()
{
unsigned char i = 127;
char j;
printf(%d\n,
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 05:42, Hans Lambermont wrote:
Is anyone else able to upgrade from stable to current ?
I'm running current, and I'm experiencing the same problem you are.
--
Michael D. Harnois bilocational bivocational
Pastor, Redeemer Lutheran Church
¿¬¾Ö¶õ ³²ÀÚ°¡ ´Ü ÇÑ »ç¶÷ÀÇ ¿©ÀÚ¿¡ ¸¸Á·Çϱâ À§ÇØ Ä¡·ç´Â ³ë·ÂÀÌ´Ù. -Ç® Á¦¶ó¸£µð
±¸Çؼ ¾òÀº »ç¶ûÀº ÁÁÀº °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±¸ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¾òÀº °ÍÀº ´õ¿í ÁÁ´Ù. -¼ÎÀͽºÇǾî
»ç¶ûÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀλýÀÌ´Ù. ±â»ÝÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °÷¿¡ »ç¶÷°ú »ç¶÷ »çÀÌÀÇ °áÇÕÀÌ
¹ÞÀ¸½Ã´Â ºÐ²² ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸°¡ µÇ±æ ¹Ù¶ó¸ç º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
±×·¸Áö
I've submitted a bug report to GCC GNATS:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gccpr=6677cmd=view+audit-trail
Let's see how they handle this.
--
/
/__ __Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org /
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:31:19PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
So - yes - it seems gcc 3.1 does have a problem...
Indeed - easily determined by breaking down the expression.
So, who's gonna report it to gcc-bugs? knu?...
Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take
Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take the
ISO-C spec and explain the problem. Or even w/o the spec -- I haven't
been reading this thread.
int
main()
{
unsigned char i = 127;
char j;
printf(%d\n, ((char)(i 1)));
This prints -2, which is
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:06:49PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
Specifically what is the problem? Given the program below, take the
ISO-C spec and explain the problem. Or even w/o the spec -- I haven't
been reading this thread.
int
main()
{
unsigned char i = 127;
char j;
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:14:01PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/bochs make
[...]
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/bochs/work/bochs-1.4/iodev'
[...]
c++ -c -O2 -pipe -march=pentiumpro -fno-rtti
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:07:25AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
it's possible to achieve this with:
: make \
: -DNO_worldtmp -DNO_bootstrap-tools -DNO_cleanobj -DNO_obj \
: -DNO_build-tools -DNO_cross-tools \
: buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foo
Which in essence is equivalent to
Warner == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Warner H, I've found that the Intel PRO/Wireless are 5.0V devices.
Warner Maybe this is a different card than what I'm used to dealing
Warner with.
From the reseller, this is the main difference beetween 2011 2011b
(chipset difference
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RS/6000's didn't used to use PPC processors at all; so it's
probably intentional software compatability.
I'm confused then - the one we have here seems to. There
was a version
Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the
base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally
use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles.
Thanks,
-aDe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Ade Lovett wrote:
Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the
base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally
use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles.
I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but
On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always
simply use sed for this ?
Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing feature
of sed that was recently added, and thus it needs to be
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:52:45PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always
simply use sed for this ?
Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing
Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place
Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it
Ade needs to be conditional on ${OSVERSION}.
Why can't we use ed for in-place edits?
--lyndon
To
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:31:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
This actually doesn't affect only cross-arch case, the subject is wrong.
It affects any arch with HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT HOST_BITS_PER_LONG e.g.
alpha.
This *is* only a cross issue.
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT == HOST_BITS_PER_LONG
We have started a ALTQ integration in FreeBSD project which is
headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD
5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been
advised and we have received on principle approval. We are looking
for help with
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Why can't we use ed for in-place edits?
perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y}
is not as easy to do with `ed'.
People should find
perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y}
is not as easy to do with `ed'.
It's not *that* hard. 10 lines of shell script is preferable to
XX MB of perl bloat. Especially for this sort of problem.
--lyndon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place
Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it
Ade needs to be conditional on
28 matches
Mail list logo
