David Taylor wrote:
FWIW: It's kind of a dumb idea to send email warning about a
condition which is caused by having too much email. We did
this on the InterJet, and it was actually a pretty dumb thing
to do; you end up with a recursive problem that's unsolvable
-- you basically have
Terry Lambert wrote:
For this to work, you would have to serialize access to maildrops
by receiver SMTPs (this is an intractable problem), AND you would
need to reject mail sent without the SIZE extension, or mail
whose actual size exceeded that specified by the SIZE extension
(you are not
Thu Jun 13 07:00:00 GMT 2002
cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Permission denied
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On 13 Jun, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
By who ?
The USB maintainer..
Who's name escapes me at this point :)
Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thu Jun 13 07:00:00 GMT 2002
cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Permission denied
Mike, looks like the /work/repo isn't mounted on bowie. Can you fix
this before the next run (7 am GMT tomorrow)?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
Hackers,
Another developer snapshot is available at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20020613.tar.gz
This release is for -current DP1 only. I had to
downgrade back to DP1 due to huge amount of changes
in -current.
Brief list of changes
- Basic support for USB devices. I
Julian,
I was just discussing this with people here at USENIX and I'd like to
start the process for committing this.
Oh, gee, thanks :) but, i'm not so sure about committing. There
are several important bits and pieces that needed to be done. First
of all, i do want to see properly tested
An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:06:44AM -0700, Edwin Culp schreib :
Quoting Steve Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:51:25PM +0530, Sid Carter wrote:
| An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Thomas Ugland schreib :
I get blown away with network setup with a Fatal trap 12,
An Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:43:51AM +0530, Sid Carter schreib :
An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:06:44AM -0700, Edwin Culp schreib :
Quoting Steve Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:51:25PM +0530, Sid Carter wrote:
| An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Thomas Ugland
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:33:24AM +0200 or thereabouts, Charles Sabourdin may have
written :
première SDL sur recompillation de noyeaux et ajoute de driver. C'est vrai
que c'est un truc tout bête mais qui apportera certainement beaucoup.
Mmmh... Je sais pas si tu te sens bien de
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile 0 constraint. This
constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
compiling without optimizations.
D'oh!
Is there any chance of sticking a warning in the
On 13-Jun-2002 Sid Carter wrote:
An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:06:44AM -0700, Edwin Culp schreib :
Quoting Steve Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:51:25PM +0530, Sid Carter wrote:
| An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Thomas Ugland schreib :
I get blown away with
Jun 11 22:34:47 calvin kernel: lock order reversal
Jun 11 22:34:47 calvin kernel: 1st 0xd311c2f8 inp (inp) @
/usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:581
Jun 11 22:34:47 calvin kernel: 2nd 0xc04a5340 Giant (Giant) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_trap.c:76
Jun 11 22:34:47 calvin kernel:
I've imported the excellent work by Mike Makonnen into the tree. Please
note that it should be fully functional but there are some parts that need
some looking at:
atm
ipfilter
some others that I'm forgetting
Hopefully Mike will chime in with some others.
Please try out the functionality by
Edwin Culp wrote:
Quoting Munish Chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:14:24PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
| Hello
|
| I updated world yesterday afternoon now everything bootsup just fine
| But after I have done dhclient and my card (rl0 or wi0) got an IP an I
|
Duplicate inp warnings occur whenever 2 inp locks are held, even though they're
on different inps, because all the inp locks are named inp. I've
investigated a couple of these already and they were all places where
we intended to grab two inp locks. So, for the most part, these warning are
On 13-Jun-2002 Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
Duplicate inp warnings occur whenever 2 inp locks are held, even though they're
on different inps, because all the inp locks are named inp. I've
investigated a couple of these already and they were all places where
we intended to grab two inp locks. So,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've imported the excellent work by Mike Makonnen into the tree. Please
note that it should be fully functional but there are some parts that need
some looking at:
atm
ipfilter
some others that I'm
Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile 0 constraint. This
constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
compiling without optimizations.
D'oh!
Is there any chance of
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] escriurères
Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile 0 constraint. This
constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
compiling without
Juli Mallett wrote:
Errr, it was with 0 level optimisation that is the problem, not a real
level. Read carefully what bde said, and look at hte warnings and how
GCC deals with the code in question.
Also, your example is very wrong, read make(1)'s section on dealing with
variables.
I
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] escriurères
Juli Mallett wrote:
Errr, it was with 0 level optimisation that is the problem, not a real
level. Read carefully what bde said, and look at hte warnings and how
GCC deals with the code in question.
Also, your example is very wrong, read
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
An Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:19:52PM -0700, Jeffrey Hsu schreib :
Duplicate inp warnings occur whenever 2 inp locks are held, even though they're
on different inps, because all the inp locks are named inp. I've
investigated a couple of these already and they were all places where
we intended
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/39125 presents an
interesting hypothesis, namely that vidcontrol -m ought to be enabled by
default in usbd.conf. I tend to agree with that premise, but before I
commit it I was curious as to what the cost of doing this would be.
Specifically, I have
In the last episode (Jun 13), Doug Barton said:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/39125 presents an
interesting hypothesis, namely that vidcontrol -m ought to be enabled
by default in usbd.conf. I tend to agree with that premise, but
before I commit it I was curious as to what
An Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:44:59AM +0530, Sid Carter schreib :
An Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:19:52PM -0700, Jeffrey Hsu schreib :
Duplicate inp warnings occur whenever 2 inp locks are held, even though they're
on different inps, because all the inp locks are named inp. I've
investigated a
27 matches
Mail list logo
