Syscalls.master broken on -CURRENT?

2002-06-15 Thread walt
During the compilation of usr.bin/truss this error stops world: syscalls.master: line 55: syscall number out of sync at 7 line is: struct rusage * rusage ) ; } wait4 wait_args int The error is actually produced by the execution of '/usr/src/sys/kern/makesyscalls.sh syscalls.master'

RE: Syscalls.master broken on -CURRENT?

2002-06-15 Thread walt
During the compilation of usr.bin/truss this error stops world: syscalls.master: line 55: syscall number out of sync at 7 line is: struct rusage * rusage ) ; } wait4 wait_args int The error is actually produced by the execution of '/usr/src/sys/kern/makesyscalls.sh

Entschuldigen Sie bitte die Störung!

2002-06-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Entschuldigen Sie bitte die Störung! Mir ist etwas zu Ohren gekommen. Eine relativ aussergewöhnliche Gerüchteküche, aus der man mir ein schwerverdauliches Süppchen vorgesetzt hat, ist der Grund meiner Mail. Unappetitlich ist gar kein Ausdruck! Ist es möglich auf funktechnischem Wege(in welchen

RE: Syscalls.master broken on -CURRENT?

2002-06-15 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, walt wrote: During the compilation of usr.bin/truss this error stops world: syscalls.master: line 55: syscall number out of sync at 7 line is: struct rusage * rusage ) ; } wait4 wait_args int The error is actually produced by the execution of

HEADS UP: prefix(8) and gifconfig(8) are obsoleted.

2002-06-15 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, I committed to don't install prefix(8) and gifconfig(8). ifconfig(8) has the facilities provided by these commands. Please use ifconfig(8). gifconfig - ifconfig tunnel/deletetunnel prefix- ifconfig eui64 I'll do cvs remove after a mean time. I have no plan to MFC this

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: in amd, # REQUIRE: rpcbind mountall ypbind nfsclient ** since i don't use yp, how can i override this? or in other words, can REQUIRE be configurable too? This isn't a hard requirement for starting,

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Hmm, appears to be Luke Mewburn's NetBSD stuff, which I know. Shouldn't there be an Obtained From: NetBSD in the commit messages? Heh, sorry about that. I thought taking if off the NETBSD vendor branch was enough of a hint. It appears that I

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Mike Makonnen wrote: Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in amd, # REQUIRE: rpcbind mountall ypbind nfsclient ** since i don't use yp, how can i override this? or in other words, can

Re: More X breakage in XFree86-4-Servers ...

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/work/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src. *** Error code 1 I'm getting this as

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-06-15 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:30:19PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: I.e. if REQUIRE describes soft dependency ordering, what describes hard dependency ordering? Why the need to distingish? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: This is a bug in bsd.kern.mk. -ffreestanding never belonged there, since it is also needed for modules and perhaps for boot programs and libstand. Module makefiles still include bsd.kern.mk, but Makefiles for boot programs have regressed. Your x86 box must be out of

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Maxime Henrion
Terry Lambert wrote: What exactly does this do, besides implying -fno-builtin? The documentation says and implies main has no special requirements... Neither the kernel nor modules have a main, so the only thing that's relevent here is the -fno-builtin, right? IIRC, -ffreestanding

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:30:19PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: I.e. if REQUIRE describes soft dependency ordering, what describes hard dependency ordering? Why the need to distingish? Otherwise circular dependencies. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
I have the following sound card on my laptop, does anyone know how hard it would be to add this card to the pcm driver. none2@pci0:14:0:class=0x040100 card=0x2550107b chip=0x1978125d rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'ESS Technology' device = 'ES1978 Maestro-2E Audiodrive, ES1970

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread Scott Long
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 02:52:33PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: I have the following sound card on my laptop, does anyone know how hard it would be to add this card to the pcm driver. none2@pci0:14:0:class=0x040100 card=0x2550107b chip=0x1978125d rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Maxime Henrion wrote: Terry Lambert wrote: What exactly does this do, besides implying -fno-builtin? The documentation says and implies main has no special requirements... Neither the kernel nor modules have a main, so the only thing that's relevent here is the -fno-builtin, right?

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 01:52:16PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 02:52:33PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: I have the following sound card on my laptop, does anyone know how hard it would be to add this card to the pcm driver. none2@pci0:14:0:

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:49:29 -0700, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: IIRC, -ffreestanding prevented GCC3 from being stupid optimizations like `-ffreestanding' tells the compiler that it is to operate as a free-standing implementation (in the words of the C standard); i.e., that there is

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : pcm0: ESS Technology Maestro-2E irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 : pcm0: unable to map register space : device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 FreeBSD should, but isn't, assign resources to PCI

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : pcm0: ESS Technology Maestro-2E irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 : pcm0: unable to map register space : device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 FreeBSD should, but isn't,

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
past, the BIOS has done this, but MS has migrated this functionality into the OS. That's why you see a lot of these sorts of failures with various kludges in the FreeBSD tree. That's part of what I was talking about in the developers conference when I said we needed to make PCI work again

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : pcm0: ESS Technology Maestro-2E irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 : : pcm0: unable to map

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
We write it. It isn't in the BIOS anymore. Usually with ACPI. Now that msmith left, do we have any acpi gurus? -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:49:52 -0700 Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:30:19PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: I.e. if REQUIRE describes soft dependency ordering, what describes hard dependency ordering? Why the need to distingish?

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Makonnen wrote: On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:49:52 -0700 Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:30:19PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: I.e. if REQUIRE describes soft dependency ordering, what describes hard dependency ordering? Why

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
M. Warner Losh wrote: : FreeBSD should, but isn't, assign resources to PCI devices. In the : past, the BIOS has done this, but MS has migrated this functionality : into the OS. That's why you see a lot of these sorts of failures with : various kludges in the FreeBSD tree. That's part

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
That was kind of my point to David: blaming MS doesn't make FreeBSD work. At some point, you have to accept that the problem is yours, rather than being caused by some outside agency. I'm not sure I understand if you're referring to me. I haven't blamed MS or even mentioned MS. If I

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : We write it. It isn't in the BIOS anymore. Usually with ACPI. : Now that msmith left, do we have any acpi gurus? There are many japanese that are expert at this. I had plans on taking up at least some

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : That was kind of my point to David: blaming MS doesn't make FreeBSD : work. At some point, you have to accept that the problem is yours, : rather than being caused by some outside agency. Actually, it was caused

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:07:53PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : We write it. It isn't in the BIOS anymore. Usually with ACPI. : Now that msmith left, do we have any acpi gurus? There are many

Re: More X breakage in XFree86-4-Servers ...

2002-06-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 01:39:08PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: ESS sound card support on laptop

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: That was kind of my point to David: blaming MS doesn't make FreeBSD work. At some point, you have to accept that the problem is yours, rather than being caused by some outside agency. I'm not sure I understand if you're referring to me. I haven't blamed MS

Re: More X breakage in XFree86-4-Servers ...

2002-06-15 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Has anyone actually submitted a bug report to GCC yet? I don't believe so. I'm not sure exactly what is broken or the circumstances that cause the problem. My lack of c knowledge is preventing me from saying much more than X-Servers won't build. Would you be willing to help me figure out

Re: HEADS UP: prefix(8) and gifconfig(8) are obsoleted.

2002-06-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 03:14:17AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: I committed to don't install prefix(8) and gifconfig(8). ifconfig(8) has the facilities provided by these commands. Please use ifconfig(8). gifconfig - ifconfig tunnel/deletetunnel prefix- ifconfig eui64

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 15 June 2002 at 11:30:08 -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Mike Makonnen wrote: Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in amd, # REQUIRE: rpcbind mountall ypbind nfsclient ** since i don't use yp,

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Mark Valentine
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Lambert) Date: Sat 15 Jun, 2002 Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build That is an incredibly *fugly* optimization. It assumes that I use libc, unless I have -ffreestanding, and it assumes my implementation of printf vs. puts. It means you

Zsh dumps core after cap_get_proc() removal

2002-06-15 Thread Munehiro Matsuda
Hello Robert Watson, After removal of cap_get_proc() and friends from libc, zsh from the ports started to dump core: $ zsh [1] 7477 Bad system call (core dumped) zsh $ $ gdb /usr/local/bin/zsh zsh.core GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software,

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Maxime Henrion wrote: Terry Lambert wrote: What exactly does this do, besides implying -fno-builtin? The documentation says and implies main has no special requirements... Neither the kernel nor modules have a main, so the only thing

[PATCH] sed is broken in -CURRENT

2002-06-15 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
After the recent round of -i fixes to sed, certain ports will no longer make configure (gaim being a prime example). The problem is that mf_fgets() is unnecessarily overwriting sp-len. The attached patch corrects the problem while still allowing -i to work on multiple files. As a ports

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: printf( const string); - pusts( const string); That is an incredibly *fugly* optimization. It assumes that I use libc, unless I have -ffreestanding, and it assumes my implementation of printf vs. puts. This is a routine optimization. It assumes that you use a C

Re: C++ problems

2002-06-15 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Wesley Morgan wrote: I cleaned up my /usr/lib and /usr/include file of stale headers/libs left after the libstdc++ upgrade (maybe this should be in src/UPDATING??), and now any port that uses C++ autoconf fails to configure... checking if STL implementation is SGI like... no checking if

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-15 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:30:19 -0700 Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ick. What should be used instead of REQUIRE to mean that it will be started? I.e. if REQUIRE describes soft dependency ordering, what describes hard dependency ordering? Correct, the REQUIRE line only describes

Re: 'sh' core dumps with signal 4 and another problems...

2002-06-15 Thread Tim J. Robbins
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:45:42AM +0600, Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky wrote: 2. When I try to build kernel with bktr (or just to build custom kernel) 'sh' is core dumps. This not enough information to track down any problem. Please give an example of how to cause the problem, a backtrace

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:44:31 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 13 June 2002 at 15:37:55 -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I've imported the excellent work by Mike Makonnen into the tree. Can you summarize what the differences are? o Instead of a few monolithic

Re[2]: 'sh' core dumps with signal 4 and another problems...

2002-06-15 Thread Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky
DEBUG=-g, ddb and another debug stuff. Now I have downloaded 5.0-CURRENT-20020615-JPSNAP and wanna try to install it. I will send information about this problem in that snapshot. But I am disturbed much more with a problem with CVS... Vl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 15 June 2002 at 0:34:36 -0700, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:44:31 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 13 June 2002 at 15:37:55 -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I've imported the excellent work by Mike Makonnen into the tree. Can you

Re: 'sh' core dumps with signal 4 and another problems...

2002-06-15 Thread Yamada Ken Takeshi
Hi! Do you enable softupdate? I have had core dump right after booting and about to login: prompt. I disabled all softupdates, and now it works fine so far. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:53:03 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday, 15 June 2002 at 0:34:36 -0700, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:44:31 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 13 June 2002 at 15:37:55 -0700, Gordon Tetlow

Re: Have random panic somewhere near console driver on fresh current

2002-06-15 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote: System: FreeBSD vbook.express.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Wed Jun 5 17:36:46 MSD 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/sys/i386/compile/VBOOK i386 gdm runned from /etc/ttys by init gnome environment xconsole runned both by gdm

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-15 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote: I recently noticed that we are adding the -ffreestanding flag twice for kernel builds. It's added once if GCC3 is defined in /usr/share/mk/bsd.kern.mk and another time inconditionally in /sys/conf/kern.pre.mk. As a result, I have -ffreestanding

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-15 Thread Doug Barton
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Hmm, appears to be Luke Mewburn's NetBSD stuff, which I know. Shouldn't there be an Obtained From: NetBSD in the commit messages? Are you (or is anybody) doing something about keeping as close as possible to being in sync with NetBSD? This project has been

Entschuldigen Sie bitte die Störung!

2002-06-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Entschuldigen Sie bitte die Störung! Mir ist etwas zu Ohren gekommen. Eine relativ aussergewöhnliche Gerüchteküche, aus der man mir ein schwerverdauliches Süppchen vorgesetzt hat, ist der Grund meiner Mail. Unappetitlich ist gar kein Ausdruck! Ist es möglich auf funktechnischem Wege(in welchen