Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-10 Thread Thyer, Matthew
John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: [snip] Excuse me while I go outside and shoot myself. Hahahaha! Glad to see you have fixed them. :) Unfortunately, there are still more problems. :-( I have found some of them. And what is really scary is that I have

NEWCARD

2002-07-10 Thread Kurt Erik Lindqvist
I am pretty new to FreeBSD, but I am trying to get current to run on my laptop with cardbus. With DP1 the kernel crashes everytime I insert a card. After diving in I realised that I must have made a mistake when compiling it. I then did cvsup to get the latest version but trying I just get

don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.recent -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Thyer, Matthew
=== Registering installation for XFree86-documents-4.2.0 === Returning to build of XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 === XFree86-4.2.0_1,1 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/UTBI__10-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz - not found ===Verifying install for

Re: Crash dumps on current

2002-07-10 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:37:20AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: Welcome to -current. I haven't been able to get crash dumps to work for a while :-( I usually set up a serial console between two machines and run gdb live to debug the kernel. Crash dumps have been working

Re: NEWCARD

2002-07-10 Thread Julian Elischer
the new code has been tweeked for gcc 3.1 in 3.1 you need foo[] in 2.95 you needed foo[0] you can follow the instructions in /usr/src/Makefile specifically the make buildkernel bit to make both the new compiler and build the kernel with it. On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Alex Zepeda
After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel (and boy is it wickedly unstable as of now). Anyways.. is there any sort of list of known warnings? I'm seeing a few consistantly relating to pcm0:play:0, pcm0, inp,

Here's another panic:

2002-07-10 Thread Alex Zepeda
GNU gdb 5.2 (FreeBSD) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty

Re: bus_alloc_resrouce() fails in if_wi.c

2002-07-10 Thread Paul Herman
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: More of a dmesg would help debug this. Sure, full boot -v and pciconf -lv follows. -CURRENT is from right before KSE-III went in. To my untrained eye, the pcib1: device wi0 requested unsupported memory range 0x0-0xf41f looks suspect. How

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the

Re: Netgear MA401 pccard support?

2002-07-10 Thread Mauritz Sundell
- Original Message - From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:05 AM Subject: Re: Netgear MA401 pccard support? In message: 046701c2279c$2878c4e0$0e81a8c0@gilgamesh Mauritz Sundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel (and boy is it wickedly unstable as of now). I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box. Anyways.. is there any

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

_waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Marc Recht
While running (newly build) Xine I get following error: Fatal error '_waitq_remove: Not in queue' at line 350 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 0) Is this an outstanding KSE issue or a problem of the port itself? Kernel and world are of today. (cvusup'd

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Consider following setup: OPIE is active and allow Unix plaintext passwords for local users only (i.e. common way of using OPIE). Then lets disable all sshd auth methods excepting PasswordAuthentication yes in sshd_config. Why? 2nd bug is true:

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:50PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote: While running (newly build) Xine I get following error: Fatal error '_waitq_remove: Not in queue' at line 350 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 0) Is this an outstanding KSE issue or a problem

Re: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with kernel li

2002-07-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Jul, John Baldwin wrote: On 09-Jul-2002 Don Lewis wrote: I recently started seeing the warning message: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with kernel linker locked from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_linker.c:1797 at boot time on my -current box. It appears to be related to

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel Congratulations in turning your -CURRENT box into a doorstop! ;) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:12:56 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Consider following setup: OPIE is active and allow Unix plaintext passwords for local users only (i.e. common way of using OPIE). Then lets disable all sshd auth methods excepting

VFS lock error in getnewvnode()

2002-07-10 Thread Don Lewis
A box running this morning's -current compiled with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS coughed up this error part way through a cvs update of the ports tree. VOP_GETVOBJECT: x is not locked but should be The stack trace is: getnewvnode() + 0x182 ffs_vget() + 0x73 ufs_lookup() + 0x10df vfs_vnoperate() + 0x13

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why what? Sysadmin allows PasswordAuthentication only. Why? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Daniel Eischen
On 10 Jul 2002, Marc Recht wrote: While running (newly build) Xine I get following error: Fatal error '_waitq_remove: Not in queue' at line 350 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 0) Is this an outstanding KSE issue or a problem of the port itself?

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Marc Recht
Kernel and world are of today. (cvusup'd 10:00 CEST). $FreeBSD: src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c,v 1.8 2002/05/24 04:32:28 deischen Exp $ Do you know when it broke? Sorry, I've built today the first time. But, Christian (previous post) said he has the same problem with

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Marc Recht
I get the same message with xine on -STABLE each time i use it. Xine is simply not very stable on FreeBSD, that's why I'm using mplayer now Oh. :-) (which has it's own issues on -CURRENT) IIRC then MPlayer doesn't use threads. So, KSE shouldn't be an issue there. To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 14:17:51 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why what? Sysadmin allows PasswordAuthentication only. Why? Because he choose to not trust hosts keys which can be stolen especially when not password-protected. Because it is

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote: I get the same message with xine on -STABLE each time i use it. Xine is simply not very stable on FreeBSD, that's why I'm using mplayer now Oh. :-) (which has it's own issues on -CURRENT) IIRC then MPlayer doesn't use threads.

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 14:17:51 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why what? Sysadmin allows PasswordAuthentication only. Why? Because he choose to not trust hosts keys which can be stolen especially

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:02:43 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: But why disable keyboard-interactive authentication? There is nowhere documented that keyboard-interactive auth is required for PasswordAuthentication. It works without it for ages. Sysadmins tends to remove all unneded auth

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:02:43 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: But why disable keyboard-interactive authentication? There is nowhere documented that keyboard-interactive auth is required for PasswordAuthentication. It works without it for

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:37:11 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey, I'd really suggest you back off and chill down. You're not making any sense at all. If your config file really disables all authentication methods except PasswordAuthentication, then OPIE *never* worked for you,

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:37:11 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey, I'd really suggest you back off and chill down. You're not making any sense at all. If your config file really disables all authentication methods except PasswordAuthentication, then OPIE *never* worked for you,

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-10 Thread John Baldwin
On 10-Jul-2002 Archie Cobbs wrote: John Baldwin writes: code would be modified to fit this new behaviour, besides this, everywhere callout_stop() is used need to hold sched_lock and do a mi_switch() and modify td_flags is also unacceptable, this SMP race should be resolved in

Patch for review (was Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd))

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:37:11 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: making any sense at all. If your config file really disables all authentication methods except PasswordAuthentication, then OPIE *never* worked for you, because it *cannot* be implemented over the SSH PaswordAuthentication

RE: userret() , ast() and the end of syscalls

2002-07-10 Thread John Baldwin
On 09-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: Can these flags be changed asynchronously? If so, then everything needs to be handled by ast() anyway. userret() should only check for work that needs doing in the usual case, and hopefully there is none

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-10 Thread Archie Cobbs
John Baldwin writes: It is the same problem. What we do is change callout_stop() to let you know if it actually stopped the timeout or not. You then have to use your own locking and synchronization in the timeout function and yourself to close the rest of the race. OK, thanks. What do you

Re: Patch for review (was Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd))

2002-07-10 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
If I may suggest a fix that will probably make everyone happy... The problem seems to be the addition of opieaccess to the PAM configuration. With that addition, in -CURRENT, unless a user creates /etc/opieaccess and adds explicit permit lines, plain text passwords will not be accepted if OPIE

gcc-3.1 Mozilla Build Fails

2002-07-10 Thread Dirk Engling
Maybe this would be more interesting to the mozilla guys but mozilla compiles on 2.95.3, so I think, the problem is related to gcc-3.1 (cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/bin; /usr/bin/env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=. ./regxpcom; echo skin,install,select,classic/1.0

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.recen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Shizuka Kudo
--- Thyer, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: make: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. Stop *** Error code 2 -- Try: build ports/lang/perl and set env PERL to /usr/local/bin/perl __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial -

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:54AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box. Seems like the UP kernels are more unstable for me. Go figure. ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:332

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 10), Don Lewis said: On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel (and boy is it wickedly unstable as of now). I haven't had any instability problems

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-10 Thread John Baldwin
On 10-Jul-2002 Archie Cobbs wrote: John Baldwin writes: It is the same problem. What we do is change callout_stop() to let you know if it actually stopped the timeout or not. You then have to use your own locking and synchronization in the timeout function and yourself to close the rest of

Re: Patch for review (was Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd))

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:37:24 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: The problem seems to be the addition of opieaccess to the PAM configuration. Not to PAM, but more strictly, to PAMified sshd. Addition of it to other PAMified programs works as expected. With that addition, in -CURRENT,

Re: Patch for review (was Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd))

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Neither fix is correct. The correct solution is to remove the kludge in auth-passwd.c that tries to use PAM for password authentication. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-10 Thread Archie Cobbs
[ NOTE: I'm moving this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] John Baldwin writes: What do you think of the idea of letting the timer code (optionally) handle all the locking and race conditions? I'm not sure it can in a clean fashion since of the few cases I've known so far each client

RE: userret() , ast() and the end of syscalls

2002-07-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 09-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: Can these flags be changed asynchronously? If so, then everything needs to be handled by ast() anyway. userret() should only check for work that needs doing in the

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-10 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: John Baldwin writes: It is the same problem. What we do is change callout_stop() to let you know if it actually stopped the timeout or not. You then have to use your own locking and synchronization in the timeout function and yourself to close

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Christian Brueffer writes: The issue with mplayer is, that it crashes when i want to watch two consecutive files. The first one works fine, but when I want to play the second one, it crashes each time :) Have you tried using a playlist ? I've played maybe 20 files in a row doing that. ---

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-07-10 09:58 +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === bin/chmod cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c: In function `main': /usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c:174: warning: null format string How does this look for

wait for 5.0-RELEASE?

2002-07-10 Thread Graham Guttocks
I'm building a new primary office workstation and thought I might try -current instead of 4.6-STABLE in order to make upgrading to 5.0-RELEASE easier. Will this make it easier to upgrade to 5.0-RELEASE when that happens, or does it not really matter? Regards, Graham

Re: wait for 5.0-RELEASE?

2002-07-10 Thread Steve Tremblett
+ Graham Guttocks wrote: | I'm building a new primary office workstation and | thought I might try -current instead of 4.6-STABLE | in order to make upgrading to 5.0-RELEASE easier. | | Will this make it easier to upgrade to 5.0-RELEASE | when that happens, or does it not really matter?

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Jul, Dan Nelson wrote: I see this one once every 10 seconds or so: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with inp locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935 ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with tcp locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:928 I've never seen that one.

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:54AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box. Seems like the UP kernels are more unstable for me. Go figure. ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:32:07PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: Christian Brueffer writes: The issue with mplayer is, that it crashes when i want to watch two consecutive files. The first one works fine, but when I want to play the second one, it crashes each time :) Have you tried

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel Congratulations in turning your -CURRENT box into a doorstop! ;) Magician: For my fisrt

Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd)

2002-07-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 14:17:51 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why what? Sysadmin allows PasswordAuthentication only. Why? Because he choose to not trust hosts keys which can be stolen especially when not

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How does this look for fixing this warning? No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like __printf0like is broken. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-07-10 09:58 +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === bin/chmod cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c: In function `main': /usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c:174:

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-07-10 14:22 +, Matthew Dillon wrote: :Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : How does this look for fixing this warning? : :No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like :__printf0like is broken. Oops. I've already starting changing the calls

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : How does this look for fixing this warning? : :No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like :__printf0like is broken. : :DES :-- :Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oops. I've already starting changing the

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The main bug is that the warning is emitted. err(1, NULL) is perfectly valid (see err(4)). Apparently the sparc64 compiler is missing support for __printf0like. Strangely, my Alpha (July 3 -CURRENT) complains about this too, but my i386 (June 24

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a note that mentioned it. But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod. It was fixed more than a month ago: % RCS file:

Re: _waitq_remove

2002-07-10 Thread Richard Tobin
Fatal error '_waitq_remove: Not in queue' at line 350 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 0) I get the same message with xine on -STABLE each time i use it. I've had this problem for months if not years, in all recent releases of FreeBSD. It's not

Update to the DRM

2002-07-10 Thread Eric Anholt
I've posted a diff to the DRM at http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.ta -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 17:17, Eric Anholt wrote: I've posted a diff to the DRM at http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.ta Evolution's send button is way too big. http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.diff is the file. The patch brings the

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread W Gerald Hicks
On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote: [snips] Personally speaking, as much as GCC annoys me it is sometimes better to modify the utility code then to add yet another hack to GCC that needs to be synchronized every time we update.

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Eric Anholt wrote: I've posted a diff to the DRM at http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.ta http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.diff -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Matthew Dillon wrote: : :Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : How does this look for fixing this warning? : :No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like :__printf0like is broken. : :DES :-- :Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oops. I've

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The main bug is that the warning is emitted. err(1, NULL) is perfectly valid (see err(4)). Apparently the sparc64 compiler is missing support for __printf0like. Strangely, my Alpha (July 3 -CURRENT) complains about this

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Mike Barcroft
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] peter@panther[4:22pm]~-106 cc -O -Wformat -c foo.c peter@panther[4:22pm]~-107 ie: it looks like it is completely disabled. Maybe the sparc64 tinderbox host is simply out of sync with -current? It has a kernel/world of June 27, which seems to be

Re: Patch for review (was Re: OPIE auth broken too (was Re: PasswordAuthentication not works in sshd))

2002-07-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 19:55:19 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Neither fix is correct. The correct solution is to remove the kludge in auth-passwd.c that tries to use PAM for password authentication. I agree completely. My fix was quick dirty workaround only and not planned as a full

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please do not. gcc is just a tool. If it emits a warning on some arches because gcc doesn't understand how our libraries work, then we should disable the gcc checking for those arches on those functions. ie: remove the __printf0like completely for

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it, should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

RE: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.recen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Thyer, Matthew
Doesn't seem to work for me with PERL defined in my environment and/or in /etc/make.conf. make: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font100dpi. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4. fuzz: {1025} env | grep

Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-10 Thread Benjamin Close
Hi All, I'm using current from just after the KSE libc_r fix. However it appears that XFree86-client c++ stuff is still broken. Is there a planned time when this will be fixed or am I missing something else? (XFree-libraries compiled and installed without a hitch ). rm -f glxinfo

RE: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.recen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Thyer, Matthew
Thanks Dirk but I cant install ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients either! Errors below a gcc 3.1 ism maybe ? installing in programs/scripts... /usr/bin/install -c -m 0755 xon.sh /usr/X11R6/bin/xon install in programs/scripts done installing in programs/glxinfo... rm -f glxinfo

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-10 Thread Erik Greenwald
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:01:04AM +0930, Benjamin Close wrote: Hi All, I'm using current from just after the KSE libc_r fix. However it appears that XFree86-client c++ stuff is still broken. Is there a planned time when this will be fixed or am I missing something else?

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Thyer, Matthew wrote: Thanks Dirk but I cant install ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients either! Errors below a gcc 3.1 ism maybe ? Almost certainly a compiler mixup. Did you install a binary package? Secondly.. you have: rm -f glxinfo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../exports/lib cc -o glxinfo -ansi

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-10 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with inp locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935 ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with tcp locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:928 I've never seen that one. I'll take a

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
I'm not sure what the deal with X is, but I have several non-X11 C++ programs that work just fine. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Mike Barcroft
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it, should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR. Comments on the attached, untested patch? Best regards, Mike Barcroft Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, and cross tools phase of

RE: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Thyer, Matthew
My entire machine is built from source. I started with no packages installed at all. The only think I can think of is old binaries/libraries/other files left behind from earlier -CURRENT. Is there a tool to clean these up yet? Maybe it should be part of mergemaster. I'll clean them up

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Andrew Kolchoogin
Bruce, On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:23:06AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a note that mentioned it. But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod. It was fixed more than a